Whar Wonderduck? WHAR?
Some of you may have noticed an odd lack of Wonderduckage on Tuesday. "Oh, but you just didn't put up a post," I hear you saying and could you turn your head a few degrees to the left to improve sound quality, "there's nothing unusual in that. In fact, if you could do that a little more often, we'd all be quite grateful."
To which I reply with lighthearted laughter and another note in the Duck Vengeance book. But enough of this entertaining but essentially pointless banter! The whole thing is that I usually do my F1 on SPEED/TV! post on Mondays. With the 70th Anniversary of the Battle of Midway being Monday, logically I should have moved the F1 on (MEDIA TYPE HERE) post to... Tuesday. Nothing of the sort occurred... it ended up on Wednesday, and not early on Wednesday either. When it comes to my F1 posts, that's quite the uncommon occurrence. So just what in the world was I doing?
T-Bird Saturday
So I'm sitting around Pond Central, pointedly not accomplishing anything, when I hear a haunting moan from outside. I immediately grabbed my camera and dashed to the balcony, for this is Duckford AirFest weekend, and that moan was the sound of the six F-16C (block 52) Fighting Falcons of the USAF Thunderbirds. Minutes went by, and I realized that this was probably not going to be a good day for them to overfly Pond Central: the wind was all wrong. My guess turned out to be correct; the route they took to clear the airfield wound up being to the south, instead of directly overhead. Which didn't mean that they didn't surprise me once. See, one of the problems with jet fighters is that from the front, they're actually quite quiet. They don't get loud until they're heading away from you and those big honkin' engines (F-110-PW-229, in this case) are staring you in the face. So when the Diamond blew past Pond Central just east of me, I didn't expect it... and then they curved around to the south at high speed, passing by a gap in the trees in about a millionth of a second (or so it felt). I raised my camera and pressed the shutter button... and hoped I got the shot.
Sometimes you get lucky. Here's what the full picture looked like:
Click on the pic to see it in full 3968x2232 resolution... and see just how lucky I got. The forecast for tomorrow isn't swell... though if it gets better, I might just head out, see what I can snap.
"You're Old!" Milestone #2 Reached
Milestone #1: turning 40. Did that four years ago.
Milestone #2: bifocals.
Or, in my case, progressive lenses. Three distinct zones: far away, not far away, and reading. Computer screen falls into the "not far away" category, but only barely. It's like looking at the world through a fishbowl.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. My last eye checkup was over six years ago, and I've noticed a distinct amount of fuzziness around objects for the past half-year or so. So I hied myself over to LensCrafters on Wednesday for a trip to the OptyDoc. She said "your left eye hasn't gotten any worse. The astigmatism in your right eye has, however." Just how much worse? One full diopter's worse. The technicians told me that I now have four times as much vision correction in that lens as I did. However, I was right on the edge of needing bifocals. My vanity, of course, said "nope, no bifocals for me!" And out the door I went with my new glasses.
...and immediately realized two things. 1) everything seemed farther away, and B) everything was sharper and clearer. Neat! And then I misjudged the distance to a curb and sprained my ankle when I stepped off a stride earlier than I expected. I went through all of Thursday with the glasses, and noticed that I was having problems seeing mid-range things... like computer screens, or the dashboard of the DuckMobile. I figured it was just a case of my eyes adjusting.
This morning, I realized it wasn't an adjustment thing, I needed something bigger than that. So back I went to LensCrafters this afternoon, where they took more of my money and gave me back a new set of progressive lenses... and boy, is it gonna take time to get used to these. On the way home, I stopped at Walgreens and realized that I was... nodding... as I'm looking at the shampoo, trying to figure out what part of my lenses I needed to look through to not be blurry. And walking through the aisles. And being rung up. And in my car. I feel like one of those drinking birds.
1
Welcome to the club! I got mine a couple years ago. In my case, I need to tilt my head back to read my computer screen, but everything else seems to be at the normal viewing angle.
Posted by: Siergen at June 02, 2012 09:46 AM (PuIGa)
2
I just got back from a "grocery" run (some soda, both for Pond Central and for work, some Gatoraid, again for both places, mouthwash), and halfway through I felt nauseous. I closed my eyes for a second and it went away. Kept looking through the wrong part of the lens, then adjusting to the right part, with a noticeable "swimming" effect.
I haven't even had them 24 hours yet, so I'm hardly concerned, but that was unpleasant.
Posted by: Wonderduck at June 02, 2012 11:48 AM (V/OLv)
3
I have reading glasses as well as the regular ones now, but haven't made the leap to bifocals (or multifocals) - yet. Not so much vanity as that I tend to spend hours at one distance or the other and don't switch that often.
But when I need to read labels in the supermarket, that's a nuisance. (And I do, because I'm gluten and lactose intolerant.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 02, 2012 11:59 AM (PiXy!)
4
I'm way overdue for mine. I HAVE the benefit, I just need to USE it.
they do make some lenses specifically for computer distances which have a larger mid-range section.
Posted by: Mauser at June 02, 2012 09:35 PM (cZPoz)
5
Got mine 10 years ago (at 45) and never wear them.
Pure luck, I suppose.
Posted by: skyhack at June 04, 2012 10:30 PM (3ESSA)
Regiment Time
While I work feverishly on getting the HSotD Ep09 review done (it's proving to be both easier and more difficult than I expected), I wish to play you the song of my people I wanted to say that the Phantom Regiment has come back to Duck U for the Summer.
These folks were gathered just behind the Duckmobile this evening, listening to a speech. It's days like this that must make their lives miserable: it rained all day, with a high of 47°. This past Sunday, it was 99°... a fifty-degree shift in four days? Aieeeeeeee! So what does it matter if the Phantom Regiment is practicing at Duck U? Well...
Turn your volume up. Do it. Oh, and get a kleenex, because it's gonna make you cry.
I heard that as I left work yesterday... and that's just a warmup piece; it's not even part of their routine. This does tend to put a smile on your face at the end of a long day.
The Obligatory Music Arguement Post!
Over in some Fark thread a few days ago, someone suggested (perhaps in jest) that The Who's Eminence Front was the "quintessential '80s song."
Naturally, I took exception to this assertion, despite the fact that Eminence Front is my favorite song by The Who, mainly because of the keyboards and John Entwhistle's bass line. No, I suggested that anybody who believes that Eminence Front is the quintessential '80s song is forgetting the only song that really qualifies for that title.
Seriously, when you throw the Miami Vice tie into the mix, is there really a song that screams '80s more than In The Air Tonight by Phil Collins? Don't get me wrong, this is not a putdown in any way; I'm quite fond of '80s music in general. It's just that nothing is considered too excessive for the recording, which is what makes it work, of course. It's brilliant in that way. It's also been overplayed to a hideous level, rendering it almost a parody of itself.
Of course, many would say that being the "quintessential '80s song" is something of a booby prize anyway. To this I say "Feh." FEH, I say.
1
What about Take On Me? It's at least got my vote for "Best Music Video".
Posted by: Karl at May 31, 2012 03:02 AM (eiQvN)
2
I don't know; the quintessential 80s sound--to me--is synth-heavy and has a "bouncy" or "bright" feel.
The Human League's "Only Human" is the kind of song that comes to mind when I think about 80s music. It's got a sound which is heavy on (to borrow a phrase) "Euro-syntho-drum-machine-overkill" and I think it typifies a lot of the popular music from that decade, especially the first half.
...and 1983 is about the time I stopped listening to popular music and got heavily into Alan Parsons, too. I don't think it's a coincidence.
Posted by: Ed Hering at May 31, 2012 09:55 AM (lw0MQ)
3
I can't help you out. By the 1980's I had given up on rock entirely and started listening to jazz: Billy Cobham, Michael Franks, Pat Metheny...
Memorial Day 2012
On Saturday, the USS Iowa was moved from San Francisco to Los Angeles. Thankfully, reader Vaucaunson's Duck and his friend, Zippy, were there with cameras. It seems appropriate to show the Iowa's final voyage on Memorial Day.
Click the picture for a much larger one.
For all those who have served our country and given all they could, I
say thank you. It's not enough, no mere words could ever be enough, but
it's all I can do on this silly little blog.
2
Iowa is being towed, by the tug Warrior. Supposedly only doing 4.5 knots, but tracking shows her over half way to San Pedro already.
Posted by: David at May 28, 2012 08:05 PM (Kn54v)
3
Steven, her engines do still work, though they're not being used. She's still eligible for reactivation, and by law must be able to be "rapidly" brought back into the fleet.
If you've never seen a battleship with your own eyes, you can't really understand just how immense they are. I've seen USS Massachusetts and walked around (and inside) her. That one's a lot smaller than Iowa, but it's still immense.
That's at Battleship Cove. They also have USS Joseph P. Kennedy (a destroyer) and USS Lionfish (a WWII submarine), and I did it in the other order.
Lionfish is tiny and cramped. It's hard to believe that more than 50 men lived on something that small. Moving up to the Kennedy, it seemed quite spacious, and huge by comparison. But the Massachusetts? Sheesh, it was like an island. It was hard to believe something that big could even move, let alone cook along at water skiing speeds.
5
The Boss Lady and I toured the New Jersey in October last year. As you said, the Iowa class seem to be immobile islands - but can run with an LA class sub. The "R2D2" CIWS seem incongruous on a BB, but no more than the Tomahawk missile cells also mounted on her. Well worth the time spent in New Jersey. Wish I'd seen the old girl under way....
Posted by: The Old Man at May 29, 2012 06:10 PM (2b0Q9)
6
That picture of Warrior confuses me. Is it using a spinnaker? Or is that someone windsurfing in a major traffic lane?
7
It's not actually part of the Warrior. There's a... call it a party tug... traipsing around the area that the "sail" is attached to. I have no idea what the point of it is.
Posted by: Wonderduck at May 29, 2012 11:15 PM (q2lfL)
8
Let me explain my poor English. The party tug is traipsing around the area. The sail is attached to the party tug.
Posted by: Wonderduck at May 29, 2012 11:16 PM (q2lfL)
She's still eligible for reactivation, and by law must be able to be "rapidly" brought back into the fleet.
That is what the law said regarding the IOWAs when they were mothballed for the last time, but even in the 1990s, it was an open secret that no money had been authorized to keep the ships in such condition. Many a time the veterans of the old sci.military.naval newsgroup on UseNet broke the news, gently and otherwise, to the newbie who wanted to form the battle line again.
I had the great fortune of visiting the NEW JERSEY years ago at her current berth and despite knowing how big she was, it was still a surprise to see it in person. The IOWAs were also among the most beautiful battleships ever built, and along with NORTH CAROLINA, certainly the most beautiful of those left.
Oh, and since we are talking big, I am calling in one of my markers and asking you to do an overview on the Xeno series of games by Monolithsoft, i.e. Xenogears, Xenosaga, and now Xenoblade (Yeah, I just got the latter game.). Definitely not expecting to see it anytime soon, but someday. And let us see if anyone can see the amusing connection the latter has with a certain other sci-fi long runner...
C.T.
Posted by: cxt217 at May 31, 2012 07:27 PM (Iurth)
10
CXT, I'd love to, but there's a serious problem with your request: I don't have a Playstation/Wii/Xbox. Or any other game console, for that matter. Haven't had such a thing since the Atari 2600. If one appears in my apartment sometime in the future, I'll do it, but...
Posted by: Wonderduck at May 31, 2012 07:36 PM (V/OLv)
I don't have a Playstation/Wii/Xbox. Or any other game console, for that matter. Haven't had such a thing since the Atari 2600.
You are very, very good at showstoppers. Yeah, that would make things...difficult.
Oddly enough, I was looking at an Atari 2600 today, along with other interesting game consoles from the days of yore that I never saw in person before.
C.T.
Posted by: cxt217 at May 31, 2012 10:05 PM (Iurth)
Even if one of the Iowas were reactivated, the big guns couldn't be used. The factory that made the gun liners was shut down decades ago. The Navy made a final purchase but I believe those liners have already been used.
So it's not clear just what they'd be useful for at this point.
13
Steven, I believe I recently saw the government excessing spare 16"
barrels on the condition that they be demil-ed by the purchaser. The
picture showed fifteen of the barrels. But the only thing I found today
was HERE. The
auction closed over a year ago... Wonder if they are no more.
(Wonderduck sez: T.O.M., I had to delete your original comment because you had the full-length link in the body. Please, please, please use the link tool in the top of the comment bar. It looks better, and it sets off fewer spam alarms.)
Posted by: The Old Man at June 01, 2012 07:11 AM (V/OLv)
14
Even if those liners were still around (they're not full gun barrels) I bet the Navy yards no longer have the ability to remove the old ones and put new ones in.
K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K
A couple of days ago, Kerry Wood announced his retirement from Baseball. He spent most of his 14-year career with the Chicago Cubs, and is the perfect example of potential derailed. He was 20 years old in 1998 when he got the call to The Show. He threw a 100mph fastball, a slider that looked like it was remote controlled, and a curve that didn't so much fall off a table as fall off the top of a very tall building, the sky seemed to be the limit for "Kid K." Tommy John surgery took the 1999 season, but he came back from that to be just as dominant as before.
Except he wasn't really dominant. He just couldn't stay healthy, going on the Disabled List 14 times in 13 years (not counting his lost 1999), and his career record reflects that: 86-75. His best single season was 2003, when he went 14-11, 266 strikeouts, a 3.20 ERA, and was named to the NL All-Star team, leading the team to the NL Championship series.
When he was on, there was nobody better, but as injuries continued to mount (a torn rotator cuff being the worst, but with elbow difficulties and a knee hurt getting out of a jacuzzi thrown into the mix), he was moved into the bullpen. In 2008, he signed with the Cleveland Indians, being traded to the Yankees in 2010. Joining the Bronx Bombers for their pennant run on the last day of July, he showed that he still had a bit left in the tank, going 2-0 with a 0.69 ERA in 24 appearances as the setup man for the Yankees closer, Mariano Rivera.
He resigned with the Cubs for 2011, then for 2012, but after one last stint on the DL, he came in this past Friday for his last appearance, getting a strikeout to the only batter he faced. It was 1582nd strikeout in 1370.6 innings, which puts him 2nd all-time in strikeouts per 9 innings (10.317), behind only Randy Johnson (10.609). He was also the 1998 Rookie of the Year and holds the Major League record for strikeouts in a 9-inning game, with 20. Below is a video of every K from that particular game, May 6, 1998:
Before you think "Oh, it was just the Houston Astros, big deal," be aware that Houston went 102-60 and won the NL Central by 12.5 games. This was the season of the "Killer 'B's" (Mike Bagwell, Craig Biggio, Derek Bell), plus Moises Alou to boot. In short, this was a heckuva lineup that he took on... heck, Bell was leading the NL in batting average when he became the 20th strikeout. And he made them look silly. Look at that final pitch.
I was running a RadioShanty when this game took place, and was fortunate enough to have a satellite dish on the roof of the store... that picked up WGN. Every TV in the place had the game on, and as the innings ticked off, I got less and less work done. By the time of the 9th inning, there were seven other people watching the game with me: a few customers, a few employees of other stores.
This game is widely considered the best pitching performance ever. Yes, better than any perfect game, better than any no-hitter. The one hit he did give up was an infield single that could have easily been called an error. He also hit a batter, but Craig Biggio was hit by 285 pitches in his career (2nd all-time). If he hadn't've given up a hit already, there's no way he would have been pitching that far inside on him. No walks, 20Ks, zero runs. If it isn't the best start of all time, it's far and away the best I've ever seen.
4
As much as I want to read your next post, I don't want you feel that you need to work at writing one. If you don't have fun writing it, it won't be fun for the rest of us to read it.
Posted by: Siergen at May 19, 2012 10:43 PM (PuIGa)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 20, 2012 07:18 AM (PiXy!)
7
I plugged Pixy's three words into Ask.com, and this post came up as the number one search result. Wonderduck is now officially the world's expert on "Ankylosaurs riding unicycles"!
Posted by: Siergen at May 20, 2012 12:26 PM (PuIGa)
8
The world is, apparently, just the right size, because I found this:
Well, now that you mention it, I have spotted a massive flaw in your group's design...
...and that is the distinct lack of a teal Ankylosaurus riding a unicycle made of bees.
I mean, seriously. What were you thinking?
That's the only other mention of the topic anywhere.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 20, 2012 08:44 PM (PiXy!)
3
Okay, it's been three days! Time to post something...before we send in the GEESE!
Posted by: Ed Hering at May 18, 2012 12:57 AM (E1y9u)
4
Been there when editing a local newsletter. Take your time, think happy thoughts and soon the burnout will go away. Look after your own mental well being and all else will fall into place (don't ask how I know...)
The Adventures Of Tintin
Before last year, if you said the word "Tintin" to someone here in the US, it was most likely that you'd get a blank look in reply. To be sure, there were a few who knew of the stories of the boy journalist, but they're more a European thing. I was one of the lucky ones. I was introduced to the Tintin books at the age of three or four, and I taught myself how to read to them. Just a few steps away from my computer, there are some 16 of the books, terribly worn but well-loved. Most are the Little-Brown translations, but there are a few of the first Methuen ones mixed in. It's no exaggeration to say that I owe much of what I am to that small collection of "graphic novels," along with Monty Python's Flying Circus and the works of Robert Heinlein.
Some four years ago, some reports began to leak out of Hollywoodland of a major motion picture treatment of Tintin. It was to be live action, then it turned into a traditional animation project, until it was announced that WETA Digital had been tabbed to do an all-motion-capture movie instead. To be honest, I had incredibly mixed feelings about all of it. On one hand, I've literally waited all my life for a good Tintin motion picture. On the other hand, I've waited all my life for a Tintin motion picture, and I was afraid that whomever took it on would royally screw it up. Even reports that Stephen Spielberg was directing did nothing to assuage my trepidation. Indeed, my fears grew as more and more information came out: it was to be based on the two-book story, The Secret of the Unicorn/Red Rackham's Treasure... which happens to be my second-favorite of the Tintin stories (Destination Moon/Explorers on the Moon have the honor of being my favorite). There are also elements of The Crab with the Golden Claws mixed in as well. When the movie was released in December 2011, I discovered that I couldn't bring myself to go see it. Part of it was that I hate going to the movie theater, what with the talking and the cellphones and so on. The other part was simple fear. I knew I'd see it eventually, but I wanted to do it on my terms... and that meant when the DVD came out. Which it did a couple of months ago. Last week, I purchased it. So what did I think?
I need not have worried. It's a very, very good representation of Herge's work. In the extras, Spielberg says that when Raiders of the Lost Ark was released in France, it was described as a Tintin adventure, and he worked hard to bring that same sort of excitement to this film. For those who have never heard of Tintin before, it'd be a fun action romp filled with interesting characters.
Captain Haddock and Tintin
For those of us who know the stories, Spielberg took the time to throw in a ton of references while staying mostly true to the original work. There are bottles of Loch Lomond whiskey rolling around, for example.
Thompson and Thomson visit Tintin
Sadly, the biggest weakness of the film is the one thing that made it possible: the motion capture technology. It's gotten good enough that we're in "uncanny valley" territory. For the most part, the look works, but there are moments, such as the motorcycle chase late in the film, where it just looks wrong. Thompson and Thomson, the not-twin detectives, are disappointing as well. While they look very much like their comic-book counterparts, they have a goofy semi-realistic style that doesn't fit with the rest of their mo-cap world. I don't know that there's anything that could be done about that short of removing them from the story, but there you are.
It's an odd fact that the one character that isn't motion-captured is the most expressive of the cast. Snowy, Tintin's dog/partner, is 100% animated, yet fits perfectly in the world. In the original stories, we read his thoughts via word balloons. In the movie he's not allowed to speak, but you always know what's going on in his mind. Snowy is a virtuoso performance by WETA, and it really makes the movie work. If you're a Tintin fan, you owe it to yourself to see The Adventures of Tintin. If you're not, but you're looking for a good two hour action-filled romp that doesn't require a whole ton of thought and is kid-safe to boot, it's a good film for you. There is some violence, particularly during the pirate sequence, but no blood or inappropriate language.
I really enjoyed the movie... more importantly, the five-year old me that learned to read with Tintin is satisfied.
1
Saw it in the theater (but not in 3D), and it was very impressive. Mind-blowing was the reveal-shot of Morocco.
I thought they did a great job of translating Tintin to CGI without making him too implausible, but you're right, the rest of the characters are such broad caricatures in the comics that translating them to "realistic" CGI characters makes them implausible, and owners of prime real-estate in Uncanny Valley.
It's odd for me that I've SEEN a lot of Tintin books, but I've never read any through. I think most of them I saw in high school in a French friend's collection - Along with some original Smurfs books (before the American cartoon) and a fat stack of issues of Spirou.
Posted by: Mauser at May 07, 2012 02:07 AM (cZPoz)
2
Now I'm waiting for someone to do a movie based on the Asterix comics.
I'm glad the CGI wasn't a total disaster, but IMHO Spielberg should have done Tintin in traditional animation. I'm sure good animators could have kept the character design and the art style of the comic books. (FWIW, there is made-for-TV animation of Tintin out there, which stays true to the books in that regard.)
"There is some violence, particularly during the pirate sequence, but no blood or inappropriate language."
There are some things in the Tintin comic books that are remarkably "mature" (for lack of a better word); Captain Haddock's drinking habit, for example, or the fact that Tintin knows how to handle firearms. I was wondering how well those things would go over in an animated movie (which, in North America anyway, would still be primarily aimed at young children).
Posted by: Peter the Not-so-Great at May 07, 2012 07:46 PM (KiYAY)
3
Peter, I actually just purchased the 1991 TV series (by Nelvana, the perpetrators of "Cardcaptors", god help us) last week. I've never seen it, because until just recently it's only been available in Region 2. I almost cried when I discovered that it'd finally been released in R1.
Posted by: Wonderduck at May 07, 2012 08:25 PM (6CHh4)
4
Yeah, the drinking and gunplay surprised me as well. They'd have never appeared in a purely American production, and I'm surprised they weren't taken out, maybe replaced with walkie-talkees....
Posted by: Mauser at May 08, 2012 02:06 AM (cZPoz)
"...You Need To WRITE!"
I said that just a couple o' days ago, didn't I? And here I am, not writing for a couple of days. Just shows how lucky I really did get. I've got plenty of things to write about, just not plenty of time, what with the end of the school year coming next week. Of course, that means lil' ol' Wonderduck is gonna be awful darn busy, but never fear! There will be HSotD ep07 on Saturday, then something special on Sunday (assuming everything goes smoothly)... and then we're back into the F1 groove on Monday. But until Saturday, here's this:
That's all.
As background: back when I attended University, I somehow landed a job at the Other Textbook Store. The off-campus bookstore; the store that wasn't affiliated with any large chain.
Like the Campus store, it saw a rush of students buying textbooks the week before class. And a rush of students selling the books the week of finals. There was also the time spent sorting/stacking/labeling during the week before the buying rush.
Other than that, I never spent any time at that store. It was a little extra money, but not a great deal. And I could get wholesale price on any books for classes I was registered for.
I fondly remember the end of each rush.
Anyway, I have sympathy for the guy who has to manage the Campus Store during the rush. It has to be as hard as any other part of handling the rush.
Posted by: karrde at May 05, 2012 10:57 AM (8iMt6)
7
What have you done. Can't wait for the next ep. on Crunchy now.
Shouting Into The Wind
So you wanna be a blogger, binky? You got the skillz, you got the desire, and you've got the website. You've even written some posts... and nobody is coming to read 'em. You feel like you're "shouting into the wind." So whaddya gotta do to get yourself thousands upon thousands of readers?
My advice to you as the author of a minorly successful blog? Quit now. If you're blogging to get comments, you're doing it for the wrong reason. A blog should be something you do because you want to, whether your cats are the only readers or you get 200000 hits a day. 90% of all blogs go away within one year, say reports from the Institute Of Pulling Statistics Our Of Our Arse. Of those blogs that last longer, most are completely ignored anyway.
If you're gonna keep writing and you need to aim for the sky, there are a few things I can suggest that I've figured out over the years. None of these are things I set out to accomplish, mind you, it just turned out that way. In short, I got lucky.
First, you'll need to have a hook. This sounds cold and calculating, I know, but if you don't have something that will separate you from the hordes of other bloggers out there, you'll just blend into the woodwork. In my case, it was the F1 writing. To be sure, I wrote (and still write) about other things, but my F1Update!s, no matter how meh the were in the beginning, that got me an audience. Sure, I transitioned to other hooks... Twelve Days of Duckmas and my episodic anime recaps come to mind... but F1 was the one that got The Pond going.
Second, even if it's accidentally, you need a patron. By "patron," I mean another blogger who is already successful who'll send you readers. In the case of The Pond, SDB was my "patron," having linked to me quite a few times about five years ago or so. Shortly thereafter, my readership boomed. I reckon that SDB's patron was probably the Instapundit, but I might be wrong about that. If it wasn't for those links from Chizumatic, The Pond would have struggled along like those 90% of blogs.
Third, and most importantly, you need to write. Every darn day, and if not every day, on some regular schedule. If you don't write regularly, what readers you DO get aren't going to come back more than a few times. The Pond could be better at this, but I've averaged 26 posts per month for 82 months... and that includes July 2005, when I was still trying to figure out what I was doing (8 posts). To be fair, a lot of the 2119 posts are 200 words and a picture (Random Anime Pictures) or 100 words and a picture (Ducks in Anime), but it's something. Now it so happens I like to write about subjects that I'm passionate about, and for those, 1000 words or more isn't out of the ordinary. But if you don't write more than once in a while, then it doesn't matter: nobody is going to come back anyway. Let me give you an example... for years, Fred Gallagher's webcomic Megatokyowas perhaps the most popular comic out there... certainly in the top five. A few years back, his release routine slipped from two or three times a week to once a week... to once every two weeks... to where it is now, once a month if he's lucky. Now that he's busy not updating, the message boards on the website went from being busy and well-populated (though often insular and exclusionary) to practically deserted.
If you write every day about something you love, in a way that isn't just a blatant copy of someone else, eventually you'll be noticed. It may take a while... it took two or three years for The Pond... but it'll happen. And then you won't be shouting into the wind anymore.
1
Heck, I've had my LiveJournal since, something like 2003....
But you're absolutely right. A regular schedule helps a lot. That's something I've known since my friends were publishers in the comics industry. (Although one pushed regular schedule to the detriment of quality, and blames critics for her failure.)
One of the more self-dooming trends I've seen in some webcomics, especially those that trade in more outre' subjects, is holding the next page hostage until enough paypal donations come in. It works for a little while, but when the story reaches a good stopping point, so do the donations.
It also affects my audience for my fiction. The longer time stretches between chapters, the lower the readership.
There's just so much to DO.
(One of those things being learning the BBcode way to include the pictures. I've been using the hrefs).
I don't need a lot of comments, just the occasional one. Either that or a more readable stat-counter. *grin*
Posted by: Mauser at May 01, 2012 02:00 AM (cZPoz)
2
So, do you think 6 hours over two evenings is too long to spend on a single post?
(And should I go back and add more pictures to the earlier ones?)
Posted by: Mauser at May 02, 2012 04:14 AM (cZPoz)
3
*shrug* I've spent more time on virtually every episode recap I've done... my personal record is eight hours in one night (RRG! Ep14, 4100 words, 2 comments).
The correct answer is: it takes as long as it takes to be finished. If that means six hours, it means six hours.
Posted by: Wonderduck at May 02, 2012 06:19 AM (6CHh4)
4
Well, I thought the result was worth it this time. I'm pleased with how the last one came out. Plus I learned how to BBCode the pictures, and make the pictures a link (had to edit the html to un-escape the < signs.)
Posted by: Mauser at May 02, 2012 02:03 PM (cZPoz)
44
Today is International Pixel-Stained Technopeasant Day. Today is also World Book and Copyright Day. It is also the Feast Day for St Adalbert of Prague. Max Planck was born on this day, and Cervantes died upon this day. The first video ever was uploaded to Youtube today in 2005. Hank Aaron hit the first of his 755
home runs today, and William Shakespeare was both born and died on April
23rd.
And in 1968, in a hospital somewhere near Wrigley Field in Chicago, a
Wonderduck was hatched upon an unsuspecting world. Nothing would ever
be the same again.
Name This Mystery Ship XIV
Easy one this time...
Get it right, win a post on a topic of your own choice. No pr0n, politics or religion, but otherwise it's fair game. Please, do not cheat with imagesearch or anything like that... I can't stop you and won't ever know you did it, but have some pride.
Posted by: brickmuppet at April 19, 2012 08:32 PM (EJaOX)
2
All I know is it's a four-stack destroyer. Based on "Hey! That looks like a model I had as a kid!" And the only one of those I know by name is the USS Ward, so. Sharper marbles than I possess are required to know the answer to "Hey, why isn't there a giant number painted on it, like every other photo of those I've ever seen?"
Posted by: andy at April 19, 2012 08:35 PM (R9Rm2)
3
I can answer that last part, Andy: if it had the number on the bow, it'd give the ship away, which is why I photoshooped it out. That's also why I shooped the reflection of the ship's number in the ocean out.
Alas, neither the Borie nor the Ward is this ship.
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 19, 2012 08:54 PM (PVVuW)
4
USS Buchanan, later HMS Campbeltown. Good job photoshopping out the bow number... I was initially looking at Clemson-class boats until I realized it was a Wickes.
Her claim to fame is being stuffed with explosives and blown up during the St. Nazaire raid.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at April 19, 2012 08:58 PM (I55Es)
Got a topic? Or should I just assume another Mystery Ship?
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 19, 2012 09:14 PM (PVVuW)
6
I have a thought for Mystery Ship that you should do, but I don't want to post it in comments for everyone to see, and you (understandably, I guess) don't seem to have an e-mail address on your blog.
Anyway another Mystery Ship of your choosing would be spiffy.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at April 19, 2012 09:26 PM (I55Es)
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 19, 2012 09:40 PM (PVVuW)
8
How can you tell that it's USS Buchanan? Are there unique identifying
features if you know what to look for? Many of the other Mystery Ships I
remember have been outwardly unique in some fashion, but this one looks
to me to be just like the other zillions in the class.
Posted by: andy at April 19, 2012 10:08 PM (R9Rm2)
9
Andy, my guess is that FDM knew about the HMS Campbeltown, and had seen the picture somewhere. Or he did an image search. Or he knows more about the 4-stack destroyers than anybody these days should know, and could tell it was a Wickes-class... and that there was only one Wickes-class DD that had an interesting story behind it.
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 19, 2012 10:18 PM (PVVuW)
10
I did recognize it as a Wickes-class destroyer (though the first thought that sprang to mind was the Clemson-class, with which I am more familiar). Then I started looking through the Wikipedia pages for every Wickes-class ship (ugh, they built lots of 'em), until I found one with an interesting story. Once I found the Buchanan I checked the photo gallery for that ship on navsource.org and there recognized the original picture with bow number un-photoshopped... http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/0513123.jpg
Posted by: flatdarkmars at April 19, 2012 11:01 PM (I55Es)
11
Incidentally, I tried image searching after I had already found it, just to see how easy it would have been to cheat, and Google image search didn't turn up a match for this one.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at April 19, 2012 11:03 PM (I55Es)
Meanwhile Lurking By A Stone In The Mud...
As has been chronicled repeatedly on this here blogthing, as a young fledgeling I was quite into this "music" thing that everybody's been talking about for a while now. While my tastes tended more towards the Go-Gos, Devo, ABC and others of the "new wave" bent, there was a small portion of my brain that leaned towards what would now be called "Prog Rock" or perhaps "Art Rock." Mind you, I didn't think of it that way, I just found it musically... interesting, in a way that even the more avant-garde groups I listened to (Joe Jackson, your table for one is ready) weren't. Bands like Yes, the Moody Blues (Vaucaunson's Duck, please crank your volume), Rick Wakeman, Pink Floyd and their ilk... not my main fodder, to be sure, but not entirely unheard at the Olde Home Pond. One day, an odd little album made its way into my feathery little wingtips. This record was reviled by many of the long-time fans of the group that made it for being too different. This record was also reviled by many of the new fans of the group that made it for being not pop enough.
The album is called ABACAB, and it's by the group Genesis. While these days Genesis is best known for their catchy Top-40 radio hits, they weren't always that band. Originally led by Peter Gabriel, they were (to my ears) a particularly "out there" Prog Rock group, one that was barely listenable at all, despite being particularly talented musically. When Gabriel left the band, the drummer for Genesis, Phil Collins, stepped up and took over the lead vocals. They also took a more "radio-friendly" turn with their music at the same time. While their 1980 album Duke had a couple of crowd favorites for concert play, it was ABACAB (1981) that pushed them off the ledge into the abyss of Top-40 radio. The track "No Reply At All" borrows the horn section of the band Earth Wind & Fire to great effect, and is probably the reason I bought the vinyl in the first place (even as a young'un, I dug the horns). Add the title track and "Keep It Dark", and you've got a album full of catchy hooks and pop fame forever, right?
Um... no. Because on the flip side (ask your parents, kids) of the record, you've got some seriously odd things. "Dodo/Lurker", with its strange spoken-word drop, "Man On The Corner" which tried to bring attention to the homeless problem, and perhaps my favorite track on the album, "Who Dunnit?", which is pure lyrical weirdness. It's no surprise that the long-time fanbase of the band tended to hate ABACAB with the fire of a thousand suns, while the ones that jumped on board because of the singles often found the rest of the album to be not what they signed up for.
Despite this dichotomy of musical styles, ABACAB was on the UK Album Charts for 27 weeks, and reached #1 for two of them. It didn't do that well at all in the US.
So why do I mention this odd conundrum of an album up here at The Pond? Because, for all of its faults and it has several (not least of which is a tendency towards overproduction), I was always quite fond of it. While the track selection on the album may tend towards the bizarre, there's no denying the musical talent on display, nor its ability to keep you interested in what's going on. And, as I was leaving the pharmacy where I get the "keep Wonderduck alive" pills every month, there was the remastered edition of ABACAB staring me in the face from a bargain rack, for the low low price of $4.99. Of course I couldn't resist buying it on the spot.
As soon as I got home, I began listening to the CD and discovered something incredible... I could still remember the *pop*s and *click*s my old vinyl copy had, and found it weird that the CD didn't include them. Of course it wouldn't, that's obvious, but in my mind, the album has them and that's that. It's still an excellent collection of music, however... not bad for a 31-year old album that pissed off most of the group's fans.
I wonder what friend GreyDuck, a Genesis fan hisownself, thinks of it?
UPDATE: I forgot to mention something I found out many years ago... the movable lighting instruments that we see everywhere these days? Like at this Pink Floyd concert, for example... they were invented by what eventually became Vari-Lite for Genesis' concert tour promoting this album. Lighting Designers everywhere rejoiced.
1
Well, I had a moderately detailed comment in the works, then I made the egregious mistake of opening a tab in my browser and my computer bluescreened.
Sigh.
To sum up, while my computer's still alive: ABACAB is quite the pivot point for Genesis, coming right after Phil's first (huge) solo success, and turning the band from more of a "Tony And Mike, Plus Phil" thing into a full-on trio. Collaborative jam sessions were in, guys bringing mostly-completed material into the studio from outside the room were largely out. The results are, as you've heard, rather hit-or-miss.
(I knew the subject of this post just from the title, since "Dodo/Lurker" is one of my all-time favorite Genesis tracks. Yes, this reveals a lot about me, I know.)
Honestly, the only track I really don't like is "Who Dunnit?" The rest of it holds up really well against the Genesis catalog, and is by far my favorite of the post-Hackett-transitional records.
I think that to understand Genesis you have to understand that, as a band, they were compelled to do something just a bit weird every few songs, even toward the end. Since this is an impulse I can identify with... there you go.
As an aside: Their first "big hit" came from the first post-Steve-Hackett record, And Then There Were Three. And it's not Phil Collins' fault, but rather Mike (later also of + The Mechanics) Rutherford is to blame... the sappy, reggae-tinged "Follow You, Follow Me." I can't stand that song...
Posted by: GreyDuck at April 18, 2012 07:39 AM (Buiw/)
2
I don't know why, and there's probably no real justification for it, but I've always felt that Duke was more of a Phil album than Abacab. It had very little in the way of old-Genesis weirdness. Still and all, Duke's my favorite of the post-Hackett albums. It just has a certain Eighties-existential ferocity which I found appealing.
And yeah, Who Dunnit? is an annoying damn track. I've heard worse in prog-rock - I had a friend re-cut my copy of Jethro Tull's A Passion Play to cut the horribly twee spoken-word rant in the middle so that I could listen to it without cringing - but that track was grating.
Posted by: Mitch H. at April 18, 2012 11:56 AM (jwKxK)
3
Mitch, a non-annoying edit of A Passion Play almost sounds interesting. Almost. I like Tull but not enough to seek out new ways to hear rubbish efforts.
And really, between Duke and Abacab you can't go wrong with either. I think that Duke is a vastly more cohesive listening experience... arguably the last Genesis album you can say that about, come to think of it. But with lyrics like you get in Guide Vocal (and thus Duke's End) and Heathaze, Tony's adorably clunky wordsmithing is still front-and-center. *wry grin* (Hey, I can poke fun. I own all of his solo records. He has his gifts, but he's never been the world's greatest lyricist.)
But anyway: Great post, Mr. Duck. Now to go "put another... record on..."
Posted by: GreyDuck at April 18, 2012 09:15 PM (Buiw/)
4
So... do you go for the Doctor Who interpretive theory of the album, or do you think it's total rubbish?
"Keep It Dark" and "Me and Sarah Jane" are arguable, and of course the latter provided some awesome fanvids. But the rest of it, not so much.
Posted by: Maureen at April 21, 2012 08:50 AM (fGqjI)
5
I did wonder about "Me and Sarah Jane," to be honest, but that's only been recently. At the time the album came out, I don't think I knew there had been a companion named Sarah Jane (I started watching with Tom Baker).
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 21, 2012 09:04 AM (PVVuW)
6
No, I'm pretty sure that Doctor Who has nothing to do with the album. The band only ever actually did one "concept" record, and that one was (by all accounts) quite a debacle... it cost them Peter Gabriel, for starters.
Posted by: GreyDuck at April 22, 2012 11:49 PM (Buiw/)
I remember that show. I didn't watch it every single week but I did watch it quite a lot. Conway was on once as a guest, and it really worked well. So they had him back on as a guest, and it still worked well. It was obvious he should be a regular, and Burnett invited him, and he accepted.
I think that the biggest reason that show worked so well overall was because Burnett is a team player. She didn't need to get the laughs. All she cared about was that the audience was laughing. And if they were, then it was all good as far as she wa concerned. I think that's how she was able to attract and keep such a sterling group.
2
Tim Conway was famous (infamous?) for breaking up his fellow actors with his ad-libs. That was one of the few times that another actor was able to make Tim lose it, and Vicki Lawrence was able to do it without breaking character. Truly a classic!
As for Carol, she was at her best when she was getting feedback from an audience. That allowed her to fine-tune her voice, mannerisms, and timing for maximum effect. In movies, however, with no similar feedback from the crew, she just wasn't as good.
Posted by: Siergen at April 04, 2012 07:35 PM (3/gGt)
3
Ranks right up there with WKRP's flying turkeys. Vicki's finest bon mot...
Posted by: The Old Man at April 05, 2012 06:41 AM (TcNy+)
4
Thanks, I needed that today. Those scenes never fail to drive me to tears.
Posted by: Tom Tjarks at April 05, 2012 11:31 AM (T5fuR)
It's Baseball Season
There was once a time when baseball was king. The nation practically stopped on Opening Day, which was on Monday. The first game of the season was always played in Cincinnati, because they were the first professional team and that's the way it always was. Hot dogs, beer, crackerjack and peanuts. The greatest moment ever was when you climbed the stairs from the Wrigley Field concourse and you first glimpsed the beautiful expanse of green beneath brilliant blue skies.
At which point, you knew that all was right with the world. Oh, the Cubs might lose or win, depending on the vagaries of the day, but for a few hours at least, you were in a better place. I'm sure there were similar moments at every ballpark.
Along the way, though, something changed, and not for the better. Baseball is no longer the king of American sports. Sushi, nachos, toasted ravioli and... walleye?... are being seen in more and more stadiums. The season isn't even starting on a Monday in Cincinnati; it's starting on Wednesday night in Miami, for Hornsby's sake!
Except that won't even be the first game of the season. The first official game of the 2012 Major League Baseball season was last week in Tokyo Japan, between the Seattle Mariners and Oakland A's... and it wasn't even televised.
There is something wrong with baseball, my friends. Oh, don't get me wrong, I still love the game, and will until I die. Maybe there's a bit of "Back in my day..." going on, but I don't think so: perhaps the pace of today's world has passed baseball by. Cellphones and iPads are replacing transistor radios and scorecards. Maybe "America's Game" has become America's Anachronism.
Maybe, therefore, I'm an anachronism. Perhaps. I don't care. Give me the National Pasttime, please. With plenty of mustard and bright green pickle relish. And NO ketchup.
Yea, verily, ketchup on a hot dog is an abomination in the sight of the baseball gods.
Kinda wish my old rotisserie league hadn't broken up....but
PLAY BALL!
Posted by: The Old Man at April 04, 2012 06:16 AM (TcNy+)
3
Ah, it's just because you're going to Wrigley. I am not "really" a baseball fan, and I don't cheer for the Cubs - I cheer for whoever plays at Wrigley.
One of my intense disappointments was the week work sent me to Chicago, the Cubs were playing away, so I had to watch that other team at that other place instead.
Posted by: Mycroft W at April 04, 2012 01:30 PM (Z484j)
4
It was the every-man sport. Sandlot games, Little League, middle and high school ball, amateur leagues, and a whole array of single, double, and triple-A leagues leading up to the majors. Who didn't play some as a kid?
So what happened to that? Well, a lot of other sports got more accessible to kids, and the big-league games got a lot less accessible as prices went up (though it's still the cheapest of the major sports). Football is king here, of course. Among the urban crowd who would root, root, root for the home team, basketball has risen as the sport of choice. And among the suburban crowd, soccer has made a lot of inroads.
That breaks the chain of tradition, where you're a baseball fan because it's what you and your dad did to bond when you were a kid. And, let's be honest, baseball isn't exactly an enthralling sport to pick up if you're not already steeped in the mysticism...
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at April 04, 2012 03:00 PM (pWQz4)
1
If the AMV Hell project has improved the human condition in any way (and it probably hasn't) then it's clearly been through the completely brilliant subversion of Azumanga Daioh.
Posted by: GreyDuck at March 25, 2012 09:31 PM (Buiw/)
2
I would have to agree, based on this related video:
http://youtu.be/OfTqDeAmFKs
Posted by: Mauser at March 27, 2012 03:03 AM (cZPoz)
My So-Called Fantasy Baseball Life
I've made no secret about my love of baseball on this here blog, and why should I? It's not like it isn't the best sport ever created. However, there have been perishingly few references to my participation in the world of fantasy baseball... and for good reason. It's been documented that the only thing people hate hearing about more than someone's fantasy sports team is hearing about their colonoscopies. Well, I slept through my colonoscopy, so instead, I'm going to talk about the thing that's brought me joy, frustration and deep deep hurting for the past 25 years, my fantasy baseball team.
I actually own a Hanshin Tigers cap and ballpoint pen. And a receipt for OMG HOW MUCH YEN???
For those who don't know what fantasy baseball is, allow me a short explanation...
2
We do have a sister league that's AL-only, which is useful... when there are interleague trades, we use the salaries the player had over there. About half of the owners in my league are also in the AL one, too.
There's also the idiot cousin version, where you have 11 or 12 teams, but use BOTH leagues. For anybody who knows the difference between a walk and a home run, it's too easy. EVERYBODY has two closers, and sometimes three (in my league, I'm the only team with three closers, and there are a few with only one stopper)... and nobody has a setup guy on the roster. Everybody has two starting catchers, everybody has superstars in the outfield, yadda yadda yadda... that's just boring.
Posted by: Wonderduck at March 25, 2012 02:11 AM (AzTWp)