August 08, 2010
Ducks In Anime Has Returned!
For the first time since March 31st, 2010, we have a Ducks In Anime sighting!
-Amagami SS, ep06
I knew I liked Kaoru better than Morishima...
A closer look at the duckie reveals something important...
...I
HAVE THIS DUCK!
To be sure, it's not an exact match, but the biggest difference can be put down to the anime style of drawing eyes... even the duckies have big ones! For the first time, I can honestly say that I possess a Duck in Anime! It came from Wal-Mart, if you're wondering. Part of a matching set of four, each in a different color (blue, pink and green), only a dollar each. They're from Infantino.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
10:15 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thought you'd like this episode (personally I found the navel kissing scene more enjoyable...)
Posted by: Andy Janes at August 10, 2010 12:16 PM (dHO5N)
2
Well yeah, me too, but I don't have a navels in anime category.
Posted by: Wonderduck at August 10, 2010 08:22 PM (iJfPN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 07, 2010
Wonderduck Pays Courtesy A Call
You may remember back about a week or so ago, I mentioned in
a comment to reader
Will that the Duckford Airport was home to a warbird restoration shop. It turns out that isn't quite the case, as I got the "restoration" part incorrect. Instead,
Courtesy Aircraft is a seller of classic warbirds
and modern planes as well... and I was exchanging e-mails with them. After three back-and-forths, I was told I could stop in any time during business hours to look around. How cool is that?
It was a sunny afternoon as I pulled into the small parking lot next to Courtesy's hangar at the Airport. I met Darcy, Courtesy's Marketing Director, and learned what I had feared: they were actually quite busy. Turns out they had a few customers in town after their appearance at EAA AirVenture, which is good! It did mean, however, that they couldn't spare anybody to escort me around the flightline. I could stick around the hangar, I just couldn't go onto the taxiway... security, y'know. I knew, and approved, even though it meant I couldn't get any closer than this to some juicy-looking aircraft:
Two T-6 Texans, just ahead of a pair of T-28 Trojans. I gather that the high-visibility yellow-painted T-6 won a restoration award at Oshkosh sometime recently, in fact. Still, the limitation didn't mean that there wasn't anything I could get close to...
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
10:01 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 754 words, total size 6 kb.
1
I've read a lot of stories about pilots who saw a new model plane, and said something to the effect of "If it looks fast, it'll be fast." That ain't necessarily true; the Brewster Buffalo actually had clean lines, but it wasn't a good aircraft.
Anyway, though, when I see a DC-3, I can't help but admirre the clean shape of the fusilage. Or the way the engine cowlings merge into the wing. I do think the DC-3 is one of the prettiest planes of that era, not to mention being the best single aircraft design of all time. (Them's my opinion.)
Is there any other aircraft that's been in operational use for 80 years? (well, the B-52 is getting close to that...)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 08, 2010 01:59 AM (+rSRq)
2
Wow!
It is nice to see a DC-3 that runs, and likely runs on a semi-regular basis, as well as being in such good shape.
The Henry Ford Museum has a
DC-3 (it was right next to Lindbergh's <i>Spirit of St. Louis</i>, last time I visited...more than a decade ago). But that one likely hasn't left the ground (under its own power) in years.
Posted by: karrde at August 08, 2010 07:45 AM (Ujx+u)
3
That question intrigued me, so I went looking for an answer.
The Boeing 727 is nearing 50 years in operation, and the Piper Cherokee is past that. The Beechcraft Bonanza began to be built in 1947 and is still being made today. Cessna began construction of the 172 in 1956.
The Bonanza, by virtue of the fact that it has already gone 63 years in production, will probably hit 80 years easy. The other two civilian planes, too. The 727 probably won't, at least as far as fleet service goes (there'll always be some third-world airline that has a frankenplane 727 running somewhere).
But that's about all I could find: rare company indeed.
Posted by: Wonderduck at August 08, 2010 07:58 AM (iJfPN)
4
Best I can come up with is the
AN-2, which has been in production since '48 (now under license to the PRC); on the civilian side there's the
Beech Staggerwing (in production between '33 and '49), though that's probably stretching what you meant.
The B-52, A-4, T-38 and C-130 are all mid- to late- 50s vintage designs still in service (though the A-4 was retired from US service in '03).
Great pictures, Wonderduck.
Posted by: JP Gibb at August 08, 2010 08:27 AM (S3r8/)
5
Very cool; I really do need to visit the aircraft museum right next to my work...
Posted by: GreyDuck at August 08, 2010 09:50 AM (7lMXI)
6
En-Vee, amigo. I trust you'll visit again when they aren't so busy and bring a report of that visit also...
Posted by: The Old Man at August 10, 2010 07:46 AM (+LRPE)
7
I worked at the Atlanta airport in the mid 70's loading cargo for Kennworthy air. They had a mixed bag of DC-3,DC-6 and C-46s they loaded for other freight services. The most unusual was the Carvair a converted DC-4 for passengers and or cars,it looked like a small 747 with props. Another rather interesting aircraft was the CL-44,a large and somewhat slick turboprop. The one aircraft I most wanted to see up close was the Connie but one never arrive when I was there.
Posted by: bouff at August 11, 2010 11:28 PM (f3+Qa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 06, 2010
Teaser
Just a teaser for the post I'll be putting up on Saturday...
It's a Notazero!
UPDATE: Pete Z reminds me that a T-6 makes an appearance in
Yokohama Kaidashi Kiko, too:
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:35 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ah, that brings back memories.... My dad and I used to camp out at the Oshkosh fly-in each summer. The warbirds were one of my favorite parts of the show, and eventually I could tell the difference between a
T-6 and an SNJ just by the sound.
It's been years since I last went to a fly-in. Maybe next year...
Posted by: Siergen at August 06, 2010 08:47 PM (jMQcx)
2
That is a pretty plane.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 06, 2010 10:26 PM (+rSRq)
3
I entertained a thought you might want to write about YKK where Texan plays a prominent role.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 07, 2010 08:06 PM (/ppBw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 04, 2010
Curiouser And Curiouser (Updated: YAY!)
So this morning I woke up, turned on my computer and wanted to check something on my external hard drive... and got a message saying that the link I had on my desktop was null and void because it led nowhere. Hm. Well, I rebooted and when everything came back up, there wasn't a problem: there was the external HD. That'll happen.
This evening, I got home from work, turned on my computer and had the same thing occur. Hm. Reboot, and there was the HD... until suddenly, it disappeared. Wazzuh-huh? Reboot, and this time, no external hard drive at all. Oh, carp. I plugged in a flashdrive, and Chiyo-chan recognized it, no problem.
I played with the cables, checking to make sure everything was plugged in firmly, and still nothing. I tried unplugging the power brick for the HD, then plugging it back in. Nothing... except a few minutes later, it came back... for three minutes, 34 seconds. At that point in a song, it disappeared again, with this error balloon popping up:
Oh, lovely.
So I ran over to the Olde Home Pond, taking the hard drive with me, and plugged it into Ph.Duck's laptop, just to make sure that it's not Chiyo-chan having a problem. No sign of life at all, just that stupid error balloon popping up repeatedly. At this point, I'm into damage control mode. Nothing irreplaceable on the drive, just 300GB of anime, six or seven seasons worth of
Top Gear, and a lot of music. The music is what I'm most concerned about, because while I have a good chunk of it backed up, there's some anime OSTs that I've glommed recently... and my BakaBT ratio is low enough as it is.
So after a couple of hours chatting with Ph.Duck, I drove back to Pond Central. Once I got back home, I decided to try again. I put the HD in its normal place, plugged in the USB cable and...
...verrrrrrrrry innerestink. Very innerestink indeed. You'll note that I said I plugged in the USB cable. While, indeed, I had done so,
it wasn't plugged into the hard drive. It appears that I'm getting an error message because of the cable!
Has anybody else ever had this happen to them?
UPDATE, NEXT DAY: My external HD is back! All it took was a new USB A-to-Mini B cable. I'm still a little nervous about it, but all in all I'm optimistic. And a big "Pbpbpbpbpbpbththhhhhhh" to the Geek Squad member who told me that it's "when things like (this) happen, it's never the cable." Much happy here.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:57 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 440 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I've never heard of a cable doing that. But if there's a short in the cable, connecting to two active lines together, or hooking one to the power or the ground, it would make the bus act funny and might well result in the USB chip flagging the OS with an error.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 04, 2010 10:44 PM (+rSRq)
2
By the way, what OS are you running?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 04, 2010 10:44 PM (+rSRq)
3
XP, newest service pack, everything but IE updated.
Posted by: Wonderduck at August 04, 2010 11:01 PM (iJfPN)
4
I had this happen to me quite recently. Ironically, the cable seems to work fine under ordinary circumstances - it only pops that bubble up when it's plugged into the PC but not into any device. (We do a lot of exports to USB drives which are then placed in FedEx, so it makes sense to leave the thing hooked up all the time...)
Also running XP here.
Tried it with another cable?
Posted by: Avatar at August 04, 2010 11:51 PM (pWQz4)
5
Av, did another cable make it not happen in your case?
I haven't yet tried a different cable... of course it's a type that doesn't match anything else in my arsenal. I'll be getting one on my way home.
Posted by: Wonderduck at August 05, 2010 07:07 AM (iJfPN)
6
I'm still using the same cable. I just reach down and unplug it when I'm not using it.
Posted by: Avatar at August 05, 2010 01:14 PM (pWQz4)
7
Sadly the cretin from Geek Squad is far from alone. I see similar problems in bug reports at work all the time, and it often takes a significant effort to persuade the reporter to get new cables (in Linux there's a famous message "error -71" which basically means "replace cables").
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 05, 2010 08:48 PM (/ppBw)
8
I'm surprised the Geek Squad didn't tell you that a $90 USB cable made from spun gold and pixie dust would solve your problem.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at August 06, 2010 06:57 AM (2XtN5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 02, 2010
AirFest 2010: Thunderbirds, Run 'Em Up!
(continued from the first post)
Even though I knew I was in a great position, I didn't realize until just a few minutes ago really
how good it was. Here, take a look at this:
Obviously the duck isn't to scale, but that really does clear up where I was located: just over a half-mile from the end of the runway. About 100 people and myself were lined up on the east side of 251, down to about where that farm area starts. I couldn't have planned it better if I had tried... and the best part is, I DIDN'T plan it, it just worked out that way. Should have brought some sunscreen, but such is the price of spontaneity.
When I arrived, there were some acrobatic planes doing their thing. Then they finished up, and we waited for the main event to begin. And waited. And waited. I figure that the big dark cloud moving NW to SE over the airport had something to do with the delay As we were waiting, an older man and his wife pulled in. They'd driven up from Peoria, nearly four hours, to catch the show. "Your timing is great, they should be starting any minute!" No sooner had I said that when a roar came from airfield; not one of high-performance engines, but of thousands of people cheering. THEN came the loud whistling scream of six Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 engines, followed closely by a cloud of white smoke and...
...The Diamond roared by. Actually, this isn't quite The Diamond yet, as #4 is still getting into position, but it soon would be. While I, and everybody else, were agog watching The Diamond fly overhead, the two Solos, #5 and #6, took off and went dead vertical, gone from view in an instant. Meanwhile, the four planes of The Diamond changed shape...
...and went by in the "Close Follow" formation, which transitioned back to The Diamond over the airfield. As soon as they cleared, #6 whipped by over my head for a knife-edge pass of the crowd. Alas, that picture is nothing but a faintly Falcon-shaped blur as he went by too fast for my camera to adjust focus. However, the lead solo, #5, was coming right towards us in a level slow roll, followed by a rapid climb-out to his right, smoke streaming all the way.
Around here, I lost track of what maneuver is which... and I don't really care. Onwards for the
really cool pictures!
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:00 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 967 words, total size 7 kb.
1
A profound thanks go out to the Thunderbirds for their performance...
more than a few times I simply geeked out and watched instead of taking
pictures. If you get a chance to see them, or the Blue Angels, or the
Red Arrows, or the Snowbirds, or Blue Impulse, or any other flight team,
take the time to do so.
But not the Italians.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 02, 2010 11:50 PM (+rSRq)
2
A few years ago I drove up to Seattle with the family to check out the Boeing Museum of Flight. We were totally unaware that the Blue Angels were scheduled to do a show in Seattle that weekend, and they were using the Boeing runway as their staging point. So after a wonderful few hours in the museum we come out to find the parking lot adjoining the runway overflowing with people, and the Blue Angels just taxing out for takeoff, maybe 200 feet away from us. Needless to say, we did not hop into our car and drive off.
The show itself was centered on the water a mile or so off, with a hill blocking our view, so we didn't get to see the most spectacular stuff, but the activity on and around the runway was more than interesting enough. In particular, six hornets thundering down the runway on afterburner right in front of us where we could feel the roar and see the shockwaves forming in their exhaust was pretty thrilling. Unfortunately they did not do the JATO takeoff of the C-130 for some reason.
The famous picture of a Blue Angel Hornet flying low to the water, with the shockwave reaching to the surface as it passes nearby boats was taken at this performance, we could just BARELY see that portion of the show and we could see the spray but not the aircraft at that point.
Posted by: David at August 03, 2010 11:23 AM (oyblT)
3
In 2002 Ukrainians killed more than Italians in Rammstein (85 vs 67).
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 03, 2010 11:36 AM (/ppBw)
Posted by: Ed Hering at August 03, 2010 04:36 PM (gLbEB)
5
David, the reason you didn't see Fat Albert do a JATO takeoff is because the US military has been running out of JATO units for a while. In fact, the last use of them was a 2009 Blue Angels show... after that, they were all used up.
Posted by: Wonderduck at August 03, 2010 05:07 PM (iJfPN)
6
Here's a link about JATO's end: http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=9
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 03, 2010 09:39 PM (/ppBw)
7
Good info, but that probably wasn't the reason in my case, as it was in either 2006 or 2007 that we saw things, and certainly everyone in the crowd around seemed to expect it. I suspect that they either had some last minute issue, or simply decided that since the show proper was out over the water and the crowd around the airfield was more or less impromptu that it wasn't part of the schedule for that particular show.
Posted by: David at August 04, 2010 05:35 PM (oyblT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 01, 2010
Rubens Is A Happy Man
No, not because Slappy got hit with a penalty for his ridiculous blocking maneuver in the Hungarian Grand Prix. No, it's because he was the fastest F1 driver around
Top Gear's test track in the "F1 Star in a Reasonably Priced Car" segment
a couple of weeks ago.
How happy is he? He went out and had a t-shirt made.
That's cool enough right there, but it gets better. He also had t-shirts made for all the other F1 drivers who have been on
Top Gear. Drivers like Lewis Hamilton, Mark Webber, Jenson Button, and I presume Michael Schumacher all got their t-shirt:
Laughter all around.
Jeremy Clarkson, one of the three hosts for Top Gear, had the line of the night. "What do you think HWMNBN's t-shirt says? 'I made Felipe Massa give me this t-shirt'?"
Bravo, that.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
11:47 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 144 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I would settle even for the 2nd shirt.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 02, 2010 04:50 PM (/ppBw)
2
The new Reasonably Priced Car seems to run faster than the old... The fastest lap in the Kia is faster than Rubens...
Posted by: andy at August 04, 2010 09:56 PM (3dQGN)
3
Well, the Liana, which is what the F1 drivers use, is fairly old and has been driven hard and put up wet, to say the least.
Posted by: Wonderduck at August 04, 2010 10:07 PM (iJfPN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
F1 Update!: Hungary 2010
It was just as bad as we thought it'd be. But the winner wasn't who we expected. THIS is
your F1U! for the 2010 Grand Prix of Hungary.
STRATEGERY: At the start, the RB6 of Seb Vettel pulled away from HWMNBN's Ferrari at a rate of one second per lap, and there was nothing anybody could do about it... until Heikki Kovaleinninninnie's Lotus lost a wing endplate. This wound up right in the center of the track, a hazard that brought out the Safety Car. Everybody dove for the pit lane except for Vettel's teammate Mark Webber, who inherited the lead. But then Vettel decided to give his teammate a gap as the Safety Car pulled in, holding up the field while Webber tagged right behind the SC... and earned himself a drive-through penalty in the process. Still, no worries for Vettel: he was substantially faster than everybody else but his teammate, and Webber would have to pit to get off his soft tires. Except when he did his drive-through, he came out behind HWMNBN's Ferrari, and Webber made his supposedly fragile soft tires last until Lap 43 while stretching his lead out to about 25 seconds. He stopped, changed tires and came out a few seconds ahead of second place. Race over, it was only a question of how far ahead Webber would be. The answer was almost 18 seconds, with Vettel third, unable to get around the Ferrari.
BORING: The Hungaroring has been on the F1 calendar for 25 years. This particular race seemed about that long on it's own. When the F1U! staff is fast-forwarding through coverage, it's bad. THIS is how we go into F1's summer break? Great. Thrilling, I'm sure.
*DRIVER OF THE RACE: Mark Webber. To go 43 laps on a set of soft tires is impressive enough. To do so while turning fast lap after fast lap while opening an insurmountable lead is nearly miraculous. Yet that's exactly what the Red Bull driver accomplished on his way to becoming the season's first four-race winner. There must be some panic amongst the other teams at the moment.
*TEAM OF THE RACE: Red Bull. First-third and they take over the lead in the Constructor's Championship and Driver's Championship? Yeah, pretty darn good. Could have...
should have... been better, with only Vettel's stupid maneuver after the Safety Car prevented them from sweeping the top two steps of the podium. If ever a team needed the summer break...
*MOVE OF THE RACE: Mark Webber wasn't the only one to stretch his tires; Rubens Barrichello did as well, running his hard tires for the first 60 laps. His luck on the worn rubber wasn't as good, though, and after he pitted he came out in 11th place, behind his old teammate, Slappy Schumacher. For four laps, Rubens harried Slappy until they came onto the front straight. Rubens pulled to the inside, and Slappy in his normal style decided to make it hard for him, despite his opponent being faster and on fresh tires. He began driving Rubens hard to the wall as the Brazilian pulled alongside. Barrichello's right tires got close to the concrete... very close... and then even closer than that. How close?
Yeah, about that close. Fortunately the wall ended before the Williams ended up grinding its starboard side down to the cockpit, and Barrichello made the pass cleanly, if angrily. He was heard on the radio demanding that Slappy be black-flagged. He wasn't, but he was given a 10 grid-spot penalty for the next race. We here at F1U think he should be flogged for such a dangerous stunt. We also think that Rubens Barrichello just won himself a Move of the Race.
*MOOOOOOOOOO-OOOVE OF THE RACE: When the Safety Car came out, there was pandemonium in the pit lane, what with all the cars diving in to change tires. The first hint we got that something was wrong came when we got a camera shot of Adrian Sutil's Force India tangled up with Robert Kubica's Renault. And yes, Renault's lollypop man did release Kubica right into Sutil's path, but he had good reason to be distracted.
The Mercedes mechanics sent Nico Rosberg out without adequately tightening his right-rear tire, which came off at high velocity, rolled through the Sauber pitbox and into the Williams crew. At that point, it was "caught" by Nigel Hope, one of their mechanics. As Rosberg said later, "I was more worried about the (40-pound) tire than I was about Nige, one of my old Williams truck drivers. He's a big guy." Hope was taken to the medical station with bruised ribs. One Mooooooo-oove to the Mercedes guys!
*SELECTED QUOTES OF THE RACE:
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
04:42 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1260 words, total size 9 kb.
1
I'm curious how did Kobayashi end 9th from 23rd if overtaking in Hungary is impossible.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 01, 2010 06:30 PM (/ppBw)
2
We here at F1U think he should be flogged for such a dangerous stunt.I agree with our esteemed host, that ten-spot grid penalty is nowhere near harsh enough. If they'd touched, or if Rubinho had touched the wall, the results could have been devastating. (This bears an eerie resemblance to an incident in the (IIRC) 1988
Spanish GP, when Aryton Senna crowded Alain Prost against the pit wall
at 180 mph. That was the beginning of the bitter animosity between
them; in a post-race interview, Prost accused Senna of having a death
wish.)
IMHO, Michael Schumacher's comeback is as big a flop as Michael Jordan's comeback. Being in a mid-pack car is a contributing factor, of course, but his team-mate Rosberg has a 59-point lead on him in the standings. If you ask me, Schumi's little stunt stinks of desperation--a driver wouldn't do something that stupid over one lousy point unless he thought his seat was on the line. (A driver shouldn't do something that stupid under
any circumstances, but you know what I mean...)
Posted by: Peter the Not-so-Great at August 01, 2010 08:14 PM (c62wM)
3
Pete, five cars DNFing and six rookie teams helped. That's 11 spots right there. The rest occurred during the safety car pitstopping, because there was darn little actual action on-track.
Peter TNSG, you mean Jordan's second comeback, because the Bulls won three championships after his first one.
The thing is, I think it only stinks of being Schumacher's style of driving. No, let me boil that down further: his concept of
racing. He's legendary for crepe like this, for bending (or outright breaking) the rules if it'll gain him a point, a position, an advantage. When he was winning everything in sight with Ferrari, he knew he would get away with it, because he was SCHUMACHER. I think he still believes that the FIA or F1 can't (or won't) touch him. You'd think his parking scandal at Monaco a few years back would have disabused him of that notion, but this
is Slappy we're talking about.
Posted by: Wonderduck at August 01, 2010 10:17 PM (iJfPN)
4
Oops--I forgot about Air Jordan's first retirement from the NBA. (That was when he tried his luck in major-league baseball, right?)
As for Schumi, I guess this move is in line with the other shenanigans he'd pulled over the years, but it's a lot worse in two ways:
a) It wasn't just petty and underhanded, it was horribly dangerous, too. Even when he punted people off track, like he did to Damon Hill and tried to do to Jacques Villeneuve, he did it in low-speed corners where the risk of death or injury was much lower.
b) He was risking so much for so little. In his other notorious stunts, he was trying to seal the championship, or at least trying to stay in contention. This time, he was trying to hold on to one point, when he's so far back in the standings that one point would be meaningless to him; even with the current points scheme, it would take a miracle for him to become
Weltmeister again.
Posted by: Peter the Not-so-Great at August 02, 2010 08:06 AM (c62wM)
5
I'm surprised that HWMNBN didn't just inform Webber that he was going faster and to let him through.
Y'all know I'm a Shumey fan, but his return has been less than impressive. Sometimes it's better to retire and be the elder statesman.
Posted by: Mallory at August 02, 2010 08:50 AM (WJ2qy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
AirFest 2010: Eagles, Spooks, Warthogs and Hornets, Oh My!
I had an ulterior motive for purchasing
my new digital camera when I did. Y'see, I knew that this was the weekend for the
Chicago-Duckford International Airport's annual airshow, named
AirFest. And I planned, as I
always have before, to stand in the field behind Pond Central and take pictures of the USAF
Thunderbirds, this year's featured performers, as they went by overhead.
See, Pond Central is right at the edge of their performance cylinder, about two miles or so from the airport, so when they extend out from the runway they tend to fly right over my living room... literally. However, they're usually the only performers who get that close, so on AirFest weekend I make a small change to my routine. Instead of going to my usual grocery store, I head to a smaller, dingier place that has the advantage of being about a half-mile from the airport. I've not usually gotten good pictures of the "supporting acts" from this location, but there's always a first time, right? When I get to the store, there's no sound at all coming from the skies, so I head inside and do my shopping. $70 later (and I forgot to get batteries, darnit!) I emerge from the Hilander and push my cart back to the DuckMobile. As I unlock the Official Car of The Pond, I hear a strange, almost spooky, howling moan coming from the direction of the airport and getting louder. Just as I look up, one hand unlocking the car door and the other frantically trying to dig my camera out of my pocket, the first of the jet performers, the F-15E of the US Air Force's
Strike Eagle Demo Team screamed right overhead and low, rolled hard left and dashed away for what I assume was to be a high-speed "sneak" pass of the runway. I quickly threw my comestibles into the back seat, moved my car about 100 feet west (no cars parking there), and waited for the moaning howl to come back. And then it did.
He played around for a little bit, including one absolutely brilliant zoom for the skies that I couldn't get a picture of because the sun was too bright, then disappeared. Content that I got at least one good picture, I got back into the DuckMobile... and then scrambled out again, because I heard a rumbling roar coming from behind me.
I've never seen a F-4 Phantom II in the flesh before! This one is from the Air Force's
Air Combat Command "Heritage Flight". A triumph of thrust over aerodynamics, the Phantom was called a number of derogatory names over the years, such as "Double Ugly", "Flying Brick" and "Iron Sled." The Luftwaffe gave it the best nicknames, though:
Luftverteidigungsdiesel ("Air Defense Diesel") and
Eisenschwein ("Iron Pig"). Strangely though, I found it to be much more graceful in flight than the Strike Eagle.
And then something happened that blew my mind.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
12:46 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 997 words, total size 7 kb.
1
Sounds like you had a good show!
Do you mean you've never seen a flying F-4 or never seen an F-4 at all? I thought they were pretty common in aviation museums.
The only time I've heard a sonic boom from an aircraft in the flesh was when I watched one of the shuttles come in for a landing at KSC. They've got a distinctive double boom without any engine sounds... The old IMAX movie featuring the shuttle (just looked it up: The Dream Is Alive) has a good recording of it, though you'll need the monstrous subwoofers of a real IMAX theatre to reproduce them well, but still recognizable on my laserdisc edition.
Posted by: Kayle at August 01, 2010 03:37 AM (q0jjs)
2
Kayle, I've never seen a Phantom II in the flesh, period. They are common at aviation museums, but the few that I've been to didn't have one.
Posted by: Wonderduck at August 01, 2010 08:51 AM (iJfPN)
3
I
LOVE the Heritage Flights, one of the best PR ideas the USAF has had. I had the distinct pleasure of seeing two shows in '08: Wings Over Pittsburgh had an F-16 and an F-22 (it was supposed to be a P-47 and the Raptor, but bad weather delayed the Jug), but
Oceana was a bit better...
And this year we're (supposed to be) getting the FA.2 Harrier!
Posted by: JP Gibb at August 01, 2010 10:41 AM (S3r8/)
4
We regularly get Hornets, Super Hornets, and Harriers flying in and out of Mesa-Gateway about a mile from my house. My parents live under the southeast end of the runway and every once in a while the Harrier jocks get frisky at treetop level after takeoff.
Now that I think about it, we regularly get C-17s, F-5s in aggressor paint, KC-135s doing touch-and-goes, and the occasional A-4 (there's some kind of commercial training outfit that uses them at the airport). There's are a F-104 and T-33 parked in a hangar as well. I've seen the 104 rolled out like they were checking the engine, but that's about it. I'd love to see it fly overhead one of these days.
Posted by: Will at August 01, 2010 10:35 PM (+tm6w)
5
Will, not to play one-upsmanship with you, but O'Hare airport in Chicago has an ANG base on the premises. Of course, it's very hard to train in the airspace of Chicago, so there's an auxiliary base here in Duckford. It's a common sight to see KC-135s and Hercs milling around the airspace of the city.
What isn't common, but does happen every now and again, is the sight of a MiG-17. Turns out that there's a well-respected
warbird restoration shop here in town on the far side of the airport from Pond Central, and one of the things they did recently (I assume for a collector) was a MiG-17. They appear to have taken their aircraft to Oshkosh this year, though.
Posted by: Wonderduck at August 01, 2010 11:57 PM (iJfPN)
6
Nice pics, havent done any airshows this year, too damn busy most weekends (last sunday was the
war and peace show too)
Posted by: Andy Janes at August 02, 2010 01:16 PM (uHTeu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
70kb generated in CPU 0.0249, elapsed 0.3348 seconds.
53 queries taking 0.3166 seconds, 329 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.