November 30, 2011
FIghter Argument Taking Longer Than Expected
I spent 90 minutes researching one of the planes, and typing details up took another hour. At this rate, I'll be done sometime around next July. Yeesh. I don't want to keep y'all in anticipation for too long, though.
While you're waiting, have a Wildcatfish!
I love that name...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
11:21 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.
November 29, 2011
F1 News Flash: ...And Mumbles Makes Six!
Big news from Renault today as it was announced that they had signed former World Drivers Champion Kimi ("Mumbles") Raikkonen for the 2012 season. His return from self-imposed semi-exile means we'll have a record SIX different Drivers Champions on the grid next year as he joins Seb Vettel, Lewis Hamilton, Jenson Button, Slappy Schumacher and HWMNBN.
We last saw Mumbles driving for Ferrari in 2009, after which he left the sport to become another in a long line of Finnish rally drivers. He then drove a limited schedule in the NASCAR Camping World Truck Series (driving the #15 Perky Jerky Toyota Tundra) and one race in the Nationwide Series, the Triple-A league of NASCAR.
Raikkonen is probably best known for being the sole Ferrari driver I could actually stand, even when he won his Championship in 2007. Unfortunately, his signing comes hard on the heels of the announcement that Robert Kubica, injured in a rallycar accident before the 2011 F1 season began, will not be ready to drive for the beginning of 2012. That probably means that he's out of F1 permanently, I'm afraid, as Renault
really wanted him back.
It seems likely that both of Renault's 2011 drivers, Bruno Senna and The Red Menace, will be kicked to the curb, with Lettuce Grosjean taking the second seat. The Red Menace does come with a metric farkton of sponsorship money, however, so that's not for sure yet.
In his introductory press conference today, Raikkonen said "Rmbmbmbmbmbbmmbm mrnmrbmmrmmbbmbr mrrrbrmmrbml."
Posted by: Wonderduck at
07:50 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.
November 28, 2011
Which Fighter Is Best? Part I: Introduction
If you stick two or more WWII otaku in a room, supply them with beer and pretzels and a suitable collection of Avalon Hill games, close the door and walk away, three things will happen:
1) the beer will disappear;
2) a game will be played (probably not
Source of the Nile, however);
3) an argument will break out.
Unless the argument is about the rules of the game being played ("Of course a T-34/85 can move in a lake hex... the rules don't say it
can't!"), it will invariably be one about "which is best". Best tank, best rifle, best navy, best game, best way to carry dice (Crown Royal bag), best infantry, the topics one can choose from are endless.
Except amongst the grognards I know, the discussion always veers to "best fighter." There would never be any structure to these arguments, devolving quickly to people championing their favorite plane, sometimes (depending on the amount of beer consumed) quite heatedly. Almost always the answer would end up being the P-51 Mustang, because, well,
look at it!
But is it really the best fighter of World War II?
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:48 PM
| Comments (36)
| Add Comment
Post contains 494 words, total size 3 kb.
1
"Early" American is the F4F and the P-38.
"Late" American is the F4U and the P-51.
But I wish there were a place for the P-47. It's underrated.
"Early" Japan is obviously the A6M "Zeke". "Late" Japan would be Ki-61 "Tony".
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 28, 2011 10:42 PM (+rSRq)
2
Oh, and you need a separate article about night fighters.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 28, 2011 10:53 PM (+rSRq)
3
That's a... twin-engine... tractor/pusher configuration... fighter?
*blink* Well, crap, now I've gotta go research that thing.
(Oh, and this may be relevant to your interests:
http://twitpic.com/7lfwna)
Posted by: GreyDuck at November 28, 2011 11:03 PM (eHm8o)
4
That configuration wasn't unique. There were a couple like that.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 28, 2011 11:12 PM (+rSRq)
5
GD, excellent solution!
Steven, what other plane used the Pfeil's layout? There were, obviously, a lot of pusher configuration planes, but very few t/p military aircraft that I'm aware of.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 28, 2011 11:23 PM (2YMZG)
6
Another dividing line (which I admit is outside your parameters) is by the
mission performed by the aircraft. A plane which is a great short-range interceptor might not be good if employed on offensive fighter sweep, bomber escort, or ground attack missions...
Posted by: Siergen at November 28, 2011 11:32 PM (OSPjN)
7
Piaggio P.50, sort of.
During the P-38 design, Kelly Johnson considered a push-pull configuration.
The Fokker D XXIII
had a push-pull configuration, but only one prototype was built.
The Russian "Moskalev SAM-13"
was another.
Now the configurations of those others are not exactly the same as the Do
335, but it shows that the idea of a pusher-puller configuration was in the air,
though no one ever really made it work well.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 28, 2011 11:42 PM (+rSRq)
8
Spitfire or Hurricane? (grin, duck, flee for life)
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at November 28, 2011 11:53 PM (pWQz4)
9
That's not controversial. The Spitfire was unquestionably better than the Hurricane, even early in the war. Later versions of the Spitfire were even better.
The main reason the Hurricane was important during the Battle of Britain is that the UK had twice as many Hurricanes as Spitfires. So the Spitfires tried to keep the 109's busy, so that the Hurricanes could attack the German bombers.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 28, 2011 11:55 PM (+rSRq)
10
Any room for the Messerschmitt Bf-109 E or even the K?
How about the Focke-Wulf 190 D?
Posted by: Geirr at November 29, 2011 12:41 AM (vC/2p)
11
Not a fighter, but I've always been in love with the B-25 Mitchell. I mean, with up to 18 forward-facing .50's (If you aim the turrets forward) it's the 1940's equivalent of a disintegrator beam.
And who else could field a 75mm Howitzer until the AC130 gunship?
Posted by: Mauser at November 29, 2011 03:53 AM (cZPoz)
12
Mine are very close to SDB's.
Can I add the P-40, as used in China by the American Volunteer Group?
It's an American plane flown by Americans in the Chinese theater of the war against Japanese. And it had the most amazing paint-job ever seen on a WWII aircraft.
But I don't know where it would fit. And I'm not sure it compares, in performance terms, to the other planes in the war.
Posted by: karrde at November 29, 2011 07:35 AM (YjM//)
13
@#8+#9: Avatar, Steven, remember the rules... "planes won't appear in both Early and Late contests." I even specifically mention the Spitfire; we might be seeing the Hurricane anyway!
@#7 Steven: So, no planes with a pusher/tractor config that flew more than prototypes.
@#11: Maybe I'll do a "medium bomber" thing. Not likely, but maybe.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 29, 2011 07:47 AM (2YMZG)
14
Early period, FW-190 and the Spitfire.
Late period, P-51 and the Corsair.
Imo, the P-51 is the best fighter of WWII period. It's range plus combat performance was unmatched.
I refuse to list any Japanese fighter as 'best' because they sacrifice pilot safety for performance. They were deathtraps.
Posted by: TBlakely at November 29, 2011 08:47 AM (GAYHS)
15
FW-190 took a long time to reach the front service. It's a late-war plane for all practical purposes.
A. Yakovlev wrote in his memoir that during the infamous visit of 1940, Kurt Tank got drunk and bragged how he developed an airplane that could reach 700 km/h. When asked about it next morning, he said that the arplane has just suffered an accident and cannot be demonstrated. Hur hur hur.
Posted by: Author at November 29, 2011 12:20 PM (G2mwb)
16
I, too, think that P-47 was underrated. However, being underrated it still wasn't the best. The biggest downside, IMHO, was how one had to be Robert S. Johnson to get results with it. P-39 was well-liked in Russia and produced a few aces. And Yak-3 of course was an amazing sports car of a fighter, too. Neither of those was as good as P-51.
Posted by: Author at November 29, 2011 12:24 PM (G2mwb)
17
Gotta take the Jug and P-38, followed by the Bearcat and the Corsair. I'm a big believer in ruggedness married to firepower. 11/11 I talked to a guy who had flown both the Jug and the Pony. Claimed the Jug was the toughest bird in the air and the 51 was a sweetheart to fly...
Besides, those 12 hour missions in a 51 would bloody MURDER my 'roids...
You know how to open those cans-o'-worms, doncha Duck?
Posted by: The Old Man at November 29, 2011 12:53 PM (TcNy+)
18
I do, as a matter of fact. Alas, the F8F Bearcat never made it into WWII, so it can't be considered. Ditto the F7F Tigercat.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 29, 2011 01:29 PM (OS+Cr)
19
Early British is always the Spitfire - though as others have pointed out, the Spitfire may have been less cost effective than the Hurricane (For example, from production and servicing standpoints, you could build ~566 Hurricanes for 20,000 man-hours versus ~290 Spitfires for 24,000 man-hours.). Late war British was the Tempest (Although the fighter/fighter-bomber versions of the Mosquito almost won out.).
Posted by: cxt217 at November 29, 2011 03:35 PM (VVfk8)
20
Not a fighter, but I've always been in love with the B-25 Mitchell. I
mean, with up to 18 forward-facing .50's (If you aim the turrets
forward) it's the 1940's equivalent of a disintegrator beam.
The strafer version of the B-25 wasn't the original configuration. It was actually a hack developed in Australia. They'd been given B-25's, but they were useless for the kind of war being fought in New Guinea. So the general in charge of air resources there let one of his guys, one Pappy Gunn, and he decided to completely change the mission.
He's the one who got rid of the bombardier, loaded a pile of machine guns in the nose, and so on. The result was so successful that North American sent a group of engineers to Australia (no easy trip at the time) to see what he'd done.
Then they came back to the US and deliberately designed a strafer version of the B-25 to manufacture.
It's one of the cooler stories of the war. But the B-25 strafer isn't a fighter, so it isn't relevant to this thread. (Alas.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 29, 2011 03:54 PM (+rSRq)
21
I recall reading Saburo Sakai's autobiography where at the close of the war he was assigned to a squadron with one of the late-war Japanese fighters that wasn't a deathtrap (resealable tanks, etc.) and that he took down a B-29 with it. I'd say Shinden, but that doesn't seem right somehow.
Mauser: For ground attack, though I love the Ilyushin Il-2 Shturmovik, nothing beats the Hs129 B3 as far as sheer audacity and coolness of potential - a purpose built single-seat twin-prop ground attack aircraft mounting a 75mm AT gun. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henschel_Hs_129)
Posted by: Civilis at November 29, 2011 05:24 PM (oFqV0)
22
Mauser, many years ago I saw a Canadian Warbird Heritage B-25 at the Oshkosh fly-in that was piloted by someone who know how to make the most of it. He was flinging that thing around close to the ground like it was a fighter; I was very impressed. I just wish I'd had a movie camera handy - I doubt I'll ever see one flown like that again...
Posted by: Siergen at November 29, 2011 05:39 PM (OSPjN)
23
Early War:
USN - F4F, since there's really no other choice. That is to say, "None".
USAAF - P-47
RAF - Spitfire
Luftwaffe - FW-190A (Easily the best early war fighter, given that "early war" goes into 1943. If the 190 is chosen for late war, then Me-109E, since the Emil was arguably the best WWII fighter until the FW-190 entered service.)
Japan - Zero-sen
Late War:
USN - F4U
USAAF - P-51D
RAF - P-51 (First used in British service and the Merlin makes it British -- yes, it's a stretch. 8-) )
Luftwaffe - FW-190D
Japan - None
USSR - None
So, for the argue-off, do we consider the best available variant, regardless of date of entry (for those aircraft that spanned both periods) or only the best available by the end of the period. If the former, then aircraft with wide capability variance might arguably be better entered as separate aircraft in each period. (FW-190A and D and Spitfire Mk. whatever come to mind.)
Posted by: Doug Sundseth at November 29, 2011 07:01 PM (xdhJI)
24
Russians never thought much about the combat effectiveness of He.129. It was considered a paper tiger. It arrived late in the war, when Russian air cover was much better, fighters were heavily armed and flown better. The 129 did not do much against Russian tanks.
As far as B-25 with 75mm, Jack Ogilvie wrote this:
"Yes I remember those flights very well, I think I was on all of them.
They were not bomb runs,those were B-25's that were fitted with 75 mm
cannons and they were trying to knock out some flak boats that were in
the harbor at Leghorn. They had a gun emplacement on a point going in to
the harbor that had two 105's and several 88's. They were the most crack
shot's I ever saw. They had a gung ho full colonel that was in charge of
the Squadron and he had us come to the briefing. His plan was to go in
with three flights of four planes and to go in four at a time stacked
one behind the other on the deck,we were to be circling above them. I
tried to talk them out of it and he got mad as hell. When we started in
and were maybe a mile out those 105s shot four rounds and knocked down
four planes-the rest scattered and aborted the mission. The colonel had
another meeting and ranted and raved and threatened court-martials for
cowardice. He said he was going to do the same thing the next day and
would lead the flight. He did and the first round was a direct hit on
his plane. As far as I know they were never used again."
The story of cannon-armed B-25 stuck with me because it was such a disappointment. Americans were supposed to fight smart, not like this. Of course I did not know about the "Flight to Nowhere" back then.
Posted by: Author at November 29, 2011 07:48 PM (G2mwb)
25
There are idiots in every branch of every military in the world.
Keep the comments coming, folks! You've already forced me to reconsider one of the planes for the "Early" fighters... which is forcing me to postpone the entry until tomorrow.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 29, 2011 07:53 PM (2YMZG)
26
Civilis, the Shinden never saw combat. The first test flight was three days before Hiroshima. There were only three test flights altogether, totaling about 45 minutes of air time.
It was probably the Ki-61, which did have self-sealing fuel tanks.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 30, 2011 12:41 AM (+rSRq)
27
SDB: IIRC, the Australian modified B-25's had the extra gun mounts in the wings, which was never an official configuration, and the engineers didn't think the structure could support it properly, so they came up with the nose mount, in both 4 and 8 gun flavors. Plus there were nacelles around the fuselage for guns, which required steel reinforcement plates on the skin to protect from the muzzle blast.
They were also successful at "Skip Bombing", which is a trip to see film of.
There's a lot of stuff on YouTube.
Posted by: Mauser at November 30, 2011 06:38 AM (cZPoz)
28
Well, the book "Fire in the Sky" says that the original Australian B-25 strafers mounted the extra machine guns on the outside of the nose of the plane.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 30, 2011 10:13 AM (+rSRq)
29
US: Late B-25, the triple threat: "We bombs em, we strafes em, and we falls on em."
USSR: Early P-39
Posted by: DonM at November 30, 2011 12:13 PM (L6j+c)
30
Fighters, guys. Fighters.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 30, 2011 12:59 PM (OS+Cr)
31
Fighters, guys. Fighters.
Them's fight'n words...
Posted by: Siergen at November 30, 2011 07:34 PM (TR6md)
32
I suppose the P-47 doesn't really rate "best". But what other fighter plane has an enemy destroyer to its credit?
Those two guys from the Tuskegee Airmen were flying P-47's when they sank a destroyer in the Adriatic. (The TV movie had them flying P-51's, but that squadron didn't get P-51's until later.)
This was after Italy surrendered, and the destroyer in question was originally Italian but was reflagged and recrewed by Germany.
I've watched that gun-camera film several times, and I've come to the conclusion that one of the machine gun rounds set off the warhead on a torpedo. Of course, that would then set off all the others in the rack, and the resulting explosion was more than sufficient to blow the ship in half.
I don't know of any other case like that in the war.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 30, 2011 11:35 PM (+rSRq)
33
Come to think of it, late war fighters which were carrying rockets or bombs might well have bagged destroyers. But that P-47 was using its machine guns.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 30, 2011 11:36 PM (+rSRq)
34
Hmmm, the P-38 Lightning qualifies for BOTH periods.
Posted by: Mauser at December 01, 2011 03:25 AM (cZPoz)
35
US Late war (1944-on):
The Seahawk without floats!
Posted by: brickmuppet at December 03, 2011 03:21 PM (EJaOX)
36
Hey! I just found another push-pull airplane. Even better, it's got a canard!
Rutan Model 40
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at January 25, 2012 05:59 PM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 27, 2011
F1 Update!: Brazil 2011
The skies above looked ugly, big black clouds approaching the Autodromo Juan Carlos Pace seemingly from all directions. It wasn't raining yet, but every driver on the grid and every mechanic in the pit lane had an eye cocked towards the heavens, looking for the first hint of drizzle, downpour or deluge. Would rain be the deciding factor in this, the last race of the season, or would we get a straight-up run to the checkered flag? THIS is
your F1 Update! for the 2011 Grand Prix of Brazil!
*LIGHTS OUT: As we've come to expect, once the race began Seb Vettel streaked away from his pole position to open a 1.1 second lead over his teammate Mark Webber. After two laps, it was 2.4 seconds and this began to have all the hallmarks of a battle to see who would be the first to finish the race AFTER the Driver's Champion. But all was not well inside the guts of Seb Vettel's RB7.
*INTERLAGOS HATES GEARBOXES: Around Lap 14 we first got evidence that this race was not going to be going all Seb Vettel's way. A radio broadcast from the pit wall said it all: "We need you to short shift into second gear." A couple of laps later came another call: "We have a gearbox problem. Short shift for second and third gears." As the race went on we were treated to more such calls... and Seb Vettel's unintentionally humorous responses. For example, on Lap 25 the team's message was an audibly more urgent "we have a serious gearbox problem, short shift please." In response, Vettel ripped off the fastest lap of the race thus far. Then, finally, the team made it perfectly clear to their World Champion that he had to baby the gearbox if he wanted to finish the race: "Short shift every corner, every lap." If nothing else though, Vettel wanted to race, impending gearbox failure or no, for he replied the way a racer should: "If I do that, I'll fall behind!" Alas, the radio was cut at that point, for we suspect the pit wall's response would have done justice to a pissed-off Marine drill sergeant. While Vettel's situation proved to be the most amusing, his was not the only car to be plagued by a balky gearbox. McLaren's Lewis Hamilton was warned that he had a dying gearbox and that there was nothing he or the team could do about it. A few laps later, an ugly grinding noise announced that the ratios had departed this Earth and headed to gearbox heaven. Force India's Paul diResta and Renault's Red Menace also had gearbox issues but they held together long enough to complete the race with little reduction in speed.
*RAIN. PRECIPITATION. MOISTURE.: As the race began, the FIA's weather prognosticators reported that it was going to rain, it was just a question of when. They had good reason to believe this; you could
see rain falling in the city of São Paulo just beyond the Autodromo Juan Carlos Pace's walls. Repeatedly the purveyors of precipitation sent warnings to the teams: "Rain in five minutes." "Rain in 10 minutes." "Rain expected inside of 30 minutes." On Lap 35, Ferrari tweeted that there was going to be rain in just a few minutes... and immediately brought HWMNBN in for a set of dry weather tires. Confusion reigned amongst the Legendary Announce Team. Finally, the masters of moisture gave up, saying that they didn't expect any rain until after the "current checkered flag." As Bob Varsha said, "what, there are more than one?" In the end, the expected rain never did fall and the race proceeded apace.
*TOWARDS THE END: After the Red Bull pit wall blistered the ears of their youthful wunderkind, his Australian teammate began to close in at the rate of a half-second per lap. On Lap 30, the Driver's Champion pulled aside to let Webber go by. A good call, as racing a hobbled car against a teammate's healthy vehicle never ends well. Suddenly everything became much more interesting, for while first place in the Driver's Championship had been locked up a month ago, there was still an active battle for second, third and fourth. The only hope Webber had to finish second was to win the race and for McLaren's Jenson Button to have a breakdown and for HWMNBN to finish fourth or worse. If Button got even one point,
he'd be second no matter what the Red Bull driver did. The failure of Hamilton's gearbox gave hope that Button's would suffer a similar fate, but the Ferrari driver seemed to be firmly ensconced in third place.
*AND THEN...: Going into the final round of pit stops, the order was Webber, Vettel (driving a gritty race), HWMNBN and Button. All four drivers put on the harder tires and set sail for the end of the race and the season. It looked like Button would finish second in the Driver's Championship, followed by HWMNBN and Webber... except for one thing. If there was a single overarching problem with the Ferrari F150° Italia all year, it was that it was terrible on the harder tires. If there was one thing that Jenson Button had proven again and again this year, it was that he could make his McLaren MP4/26 work well on any tire compound... and today was no exception. He began to take huge chunks of time out of the Ferrari's lead, leaving no doubt what was about to occur. On Lap 61, Button simply cruised past HWMNBN for the bottom step of the podium, coincidentally handing third place in the Driver's Championship to Mark Webber. However, the race was not yet over, for as Button dealt with the Spaniard, Seb Vettel began to show signs that his gearbox was making his life a nightmare. He completely blew a turn, taking to the asphalt runoff area to continue the race. If that continued, Button had a slim chance to catch him for second place.
*THE END: While Button was snipping a half-second off of the gap to Vettel per lap, the lead was much too great. Mark Webber swept across the line for his first (and only) victory of the year, followed some 17 seconds later by Vettel's limping Red Bull. Button was next to cross the finish line 11 seconds later, followed by HWMNBN with a similar gap.
*FINAL DRIVER'S CHAMPIONSHIP STANDINGS: Vettel, Button, Webber, HWMNBN, Hamilton, Felipe Massa. Curiously, Grizzly Nick Heidfeld, who hadn't driven since Round 11 in Hungary, still finished in 11th place.
*FINAL CONSTRUCTOR'S CHAMPIONSHIP STANDINGS: Red Bull, McLaren, Ferrari, Mercedes, Renault, Force India, Sauber, Toro Rosso, Williams, Lotus, HRT, Virgin. If you took all the points from third through 12th and added them together, you'd have a total of 772 points. Red Bull
alone had 650.
*DRIVER OF THE RACE: Seb Vettel. At one point in the race, he radioed to his pit wall that he felt "like Senna in '91." In that particular Brazilian Grand Prix, Ayrton Senna won the race despite having only first, second and sixth gears. Here, Vettel kept his crippled gearbox going well enough to not only finish second, but finish second easily. While we still don't know exactly how bad his gearbox damage was, the increasingly strident calls from his race engineer suggested it wasn't good. A sterling drive for the two-time World Champion in difficult circumstances.
*TEAM OF THE RACE: Red Bull. Really, how can you not give it to them? They finished 1-2, they coaxed an ill car for some 60 laps across the finish line (when their biggest rivals couldn't get one of theirs to last 10 laps from when the problem became apparent), and heck, they just squashed the sport all season long. Just tip your cap to them and move on to next year.
*MOVE OF THE RACE: In Formula 1, particularly in the age of DRS and KERS, a pass can come at any time two cars are close enough. There are certain places and times, though, that a pass just doesn't occur. In the S-Curves at Suzuka, for example, or Turn 1 at Monaco. It just isn't done. Another of that sort is Turns 6 and 7 here at Brazil. Fast right-hand sweepers of decreasing radius, blowing those will ruin the entire middle sector of Interlagos, if it doesn't pitch you off into the Brazilian terrain. So of course it's ridiculous to expect to be passed there, and it's even more unlikely that you'll have to defend against a pass on the outside of the turns. So on Lap 11, when HWMNBN closed in on Jenson Button heading down the short chute to Turn 6, Button probably felt pretty good.
...and then the Ferrari, tires apparently covered in stickum, Krazy Glue and honey, swooped to the outside of Button and blew the metaphorical doors off the McLaren. A heckuva pass in a very unlikely spot!
*MOOOOOOOO-OOOOVE OF THE RACE: Rule #1 when performing a tire change: tighten down the wheel nut. Rule #2: make sure you follow rule #1.
Thanks, Virgin Racing. We knew we could count on you to give us a laugh today, and you didn't disappoint. The wheel nut's bid for freedom gave us a chuckle during a tense race. Here's your Mooooo!
*DRIVER QUOTES OF THE RACE:
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:13 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 2029 words, total size 14 kb.
1
I didn't know about anything happening between Petrov and Schumi. News were that Bruno Senna sliced Schumi's tire.
Posted by: Author at November 27, 2011 10:10 PM (G2mwb)
2
What does "short shift" mean?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 27, 2011 10:33 PM (+rSRq)
3
"Short shift" means to shift into the next gear sooner (at a lower rpm) than one normally would. This reduces strain on the gears but also slows the car down, as it spends more time outside of its optimal torque/power rpm range.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at November 27, 2011 10:42 PM (I55Es)
4
Author, Slappy was passing Senna down the front straight into Turn 1. The Renault braked* late, doing some damage to both cars. Out of Turn 1, with Slappy nearly clear of the Renault, The Red Menace attempted to swing to the right of the Mercedes. Unfortunately, the Silver Arrow was not quite entirely in front of the Renault, resulting in much of the right-hand front wing endplate being turned into carbon fiber toothpicks, and the left-rear tire on Slappy's car being turned into something that distinctly did
not hold air pressure.
Senna was given a drive-through penalty. Slappy said the incident was "unfortunate." And I must have been taking some serious drugs when I took my notes during the race, because I got Senna and The Red Menace mixed up completely.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 28, 2011 01:18 AM (2YMZG)
5
*to some obscure definition of "braking" that involves not braking at all.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 28, 2011 01:31 AM (2YMZG)
6
Ah, yes, of course. They drive the same car. I never was able to track who wears what helmet either, except for a few frontrunners. To make matters worse, the helmet designs change over time.
Posted by: Author at November 28, 2011 08:16 PM (G2mwb)
7
You've probably seen this already, but it's a pretty incredible video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0g2yHT3Zx7w
Posted by: Mauser at December 05, 2011 06:33 AM (cZPoz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 26, 2011
Some Thoughts About This Latest Re-Install
My graphics card still doesn't play well with HD WMVs on WMP10. It all works on ZoomPlayer though, so it's all the same to me.
What's a little weird is that, somewhere along the way, XP lost the drivers for my (integrated) sound card. No surround sound, in other words, which is odd. It's not a big deal, since the subwoofer still works perfectly well and I had a marginal surround setup anyway.
I'm now using FireFoxy 3, and... it'll take some getting used to.
I dunno if Microsoft Security Essentials is working or not, though it says it is. One thing that I
really like about it already is that it isn't nearly as intrusive as my former antivirus program. For as long as I've been blogging here at The Pond, it's always taken a long time for any page inside the blog to load... as long as two minutes or more for the "New Post" screen, for example. Now? A couple of seconds, max. Uploading pictures takes nary any time at all, where it used to take for-frickin'-
ever... which made all those picture-laden
RRG! posts even
more painful, if that's possible.
That's all, nothing really to report.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:47 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 205 words, total size 1 kb.
1
MSE is working. They just did a better job on it.
Part of why Microsoft decided to write its own antivirus program was because the existing ones were crap, which slowed the system down intolerably and caused all kinds of other problems. It was damaging the brand.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 27, 2011 02:11 PM (+rSRq)
2
I just recently changed from Firefox 3 to 8, with a brief stop at 7. With a few tweaks to about:config, I got it working the way I liked. (For some reason they were hiding the transport part of the URL, I turned that off).
Some config options may have carried over. When I went from 2 to 3, they made it so that if you closed the last tab, the window went away and you exited firefox (Making it hard to choose a new bookmark)! I turned that off, but they would hide the X in the last tab. That's back now. But I'm not sure if the bad behavior would have persisted without that option.
Posted by: Mauser at November 27, 2011 06:06 PM (cZPoz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
F1 Quals: Brazil 2011
The year was 1991. Operation Desert Storm liberated Kuwait from the Iraqi military. The New York Giants beat the Buffalo Bills in Super Bowl XXV. Boris Yeltsin was elected President of Russia. Red Grange passed away. Mount Pinatubo erupted, killing 800. The first Sonic the Hedgehog game was released by Sega. The Warsaw Pact came to an end. Danny Thomas passed away. Jeffrey Dahmer was arrested. The Super Nintendo was released. Linus Torvalds first reveals the Linux kernel on Usenet. Rajiv Ghandi was assassinated by the Tamil Tigers. The Minnesota Twins defeat the Atlanta Braves to win the World Series. The
Halloween Blizzard catches a Grad School student named Wonderduck by surprise. The Soviet Union officially dissolved. Freddy Mercury, Dr Seuss and Gene Roddenberry all pass away. And a 21 year old Brazilian named Rubens Barrichello starts his first Formula 1 race. In 1992, the very next season, Nigel Mansell set a record earning 14 pole positions in that season. Today, Rubens Barrichello may be qualifying for his final Formula 1 race, and Seb Vettel has a chance to break Mansell's record. But did he? Let's look at the provisional grid for the 2011 Grand Prix of Brazil:
It wasn't even close. Not only was Seb Vettel the only driver to break 1:12.000, his 1:11.918 time was only a half-second off the Interlagos course record. That time was set in 2004, when the cars had unrestricted V10 engines and could have all manner of bargeboards and winglets to increase downforce. Further, a tirewar was in progress between Michelin and Bridgestone, thus providing wildly grippy (though grooved) tires. So yes, Seb Vettel blew the field away with a lap that looked like he was on rails. Everybody else, even his teammate Mark Webber, seemed to be having problems with grip, sawing at the steering wheel to correct and recorrect their paths through turns. On the other hand, Vettel's pole lap looked like he was just on a casual drive through the country. Amazing, simply amazing. We've seen something here today we may never see again, unless Vettel happens to the 2012 season as well.
As far as the race tomorrow goes, there's a high expectation of rain during the race. If that happens, it's a crapshoot as to who'll win. No way I'd bet against Vettel though, no matter the weather conditions.
I hope he appreciates what's going on. The race is Sunday, see ya then!
Posted by: Wonderduck at
12:50 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 571 words, total size 17 kb.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at November 26, 2011 03:22 PM (I55Es)
2
Details, details. Fixed.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 26, 2011 05:31 PM (2YMZG)
3
In my defense, the Legendary Announce Team said more than once that it was "20 years ago" that Mansell set the record. That'll teach me to listen to Hobbes.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 26, 2011 08:54 PM (2YMZG)
4
It's to Vettel's credit that he isn't letting go. He's still driving every race as if it matters -- and that's how it ought to be.
So this is his 15th pole?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 26, 2011 11:27 PM (+rSRq)
5
This is. 15th of the season, 30th of his career. He now stands sixth all-time on the career list, breaking a tie with St Fangio the Quick, who had 29 (out of 52 career starts). The record is 68, held by Slappy Schumacher.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 27, 2011 12:17 AM (2YMZG)
6
Vettel has 11 wins this year, with the possibility of a 12th today. Would that also be a season record?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 27, 2011 10:26 AM (+rSRq)
7
Sorry, Steven, I didn't see this question until Monday night. The single-season win record is 13, held by Slappy Schumacher. He set it in 2004, the first year I began paying attention to F1.
Vettel's 11 wins ties him for second, also with Slappy, who did that in 2002.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 28, 2011 09:52 PM (2YMZG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 25, 2011
The Never-Ending Re-Install II
Great googly moogly. I started this latest reinstallation of my computer's operating system around 10am Friday morning.
Six freakin' hours later, I had finally... FINALLY... completed all the downloads, updates, installs and reboots. Never mind such things as loading up the usual suite of programs, of which only Firefoxy is now installed. I had to take a frickin' nap, I was so exhausted! Or maybe it was because Thanksgiving was exhausting, one of the two.
UPDATE: In the comments, Steven asks what the above picture is. Would you believe it's a water tank? It's part of the Metropolitan Area Outer Underground Discharge Channel, just outside of Kasukabe, Saitama, Japan. Built to prevent flooding of the city during typhoons, there's also five containment silos and about 6.5km of tunnels involved. Combined with the pumps in the 177m x 78m x 25m water tank, it can move 200 tons of water per second into the Edogawa River. I first became aware of it from
Ga-Rei Zero, where it's the location of the climactic scene of Ep01. See the below picture from how it looked there!
...and then the Schoolgirl In Black kills everybody.
There won't be a post about the Brazilian Friday Practice because, quite honestly, it was the same as always. If something significant had occurred I'd let you know, but other than a chance of rain sneaking in for Sunday, a sighting of Racey The Owl, and Force India going completely insane...
Force India's mascot for the race. I should send them a rubber duckie.
...nothing really happened. So I'm going back to finish restoring my computer to full operating status, and I'll see you all for Quals in the morning!
UPDATE: Does anybody have the uTorrent 2.2.1 installer sitting around on their hard-drive? The version I have is 2.0.4, and it won't update... and I've heard bad things about 3.0. Lemme know in the comments!
Posted by: Wonderduck at
07:21 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 320 words, total size 3 kb.
1
By the way, that first picture is really amazing. What's it from?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 25, 2011 09:11 PM (+rSRq)
2
Steven, see the new UPDATE above for details of the location. I used that picture as a desktop for a while.
And thank you for the installer! Much obliged, and it's been moved into my "backup files" folder on two different external hard-drives AND a flash drive... I'm nothing if not paranoid.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 25, 2011 10:17 PM (2YMZG)
Posted by: Gerberette at November 26, 2011 08:11 PM (5DC9/)
4
Actually, I don't need it anymore, but that's a convenient link to have. I knew it was available on the 'net, but I was gunshy about going to a site I've never been to before with an antivirus program I've never used before...
Good to see you back, Gerberette!
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 26, 2011 08:53 PM (2YMZG)
5
Thank you for the link too. I seemed to misplace where I stashed my copy of UTorrent's installer, so having that place is like divine providence - all the more so since I think my PC is wheezing toward the end soon.
Posted by: cxt217 at November 27, 2011 10:32 AM (CignP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 24, 2011
Thanksgiving 2011
I like pumpkin pie. A lot. So much that I'd be perfectly happy having pumpkin pie all year round. Which is why I don't let myself have pumpkin pie more than a once or twice a year. Thankfully, today is one of those times.
That's a good start, yep. For my readers here in the US, have a Happy Thanksgiving! If you're not in the US, have a grand Thursday!
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:12 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 72 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This recipe is my fave variation on Pumpkin pie & it can be no bake too, ffw in a busy holiday kitchen. Note I make mine w/a gingersnap crust.
Pumpkin Chiffon Pie
1 envelope unflavored gelatin
½ cup sugar
½ tsp. salt
½ tsp. ground cinnamon
½ ground allspice
½ ground ginger
¼ tsp. ground nutmeg
¾ cup milk
2 slightly beaten egg yolks
1 cup canned pumpkin
2 egg whites
¼ cup sugar
½ cup whipping cream, whipped
1 9-inch pie crust either graham-cracker or pre-baked (use your favorite recipe or use mine)
Combine the first 7 ingredients a a saucepan..
Stir in the milk, egg yolks, and pumpkin.
Cook and stir the filling over medium heat until the mixture boils and the gelatin dissolves.
Remove from the heat and chill until partially set.
Beat the egg whites until soft peaks form.
Gradually add the sugar and beat until the whites form stiff peaks.
Fold the beaten whites into the pumpkin mixture with the whipped cream.
Pile the filling into the crust.
Chill until the filling is firm.
Note that, if you use a graham-cracker crust, this is a no-bake pie which can be pretty handy with all the trafficking through the oven that goes on on Thanksgiving.
Posted by: von Krag at November 24, 2011 05:13 PM (XIY2m)
2
Pumpkin Pie is the best! And a duck atop it makes it even better!
Posted by: Colleen at November 28, 2011 10:58 PM (yjcgx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 23, 2011
Dragons Weep
When I was a young duckling of 9 or 10 years, confused and frightened by the divorce of my parents, I discovered the genre of writing known as science-fiction. While my first book was Frank Herbert's
Dune, and my favorite author Robert Heinlein (whose status remains unchanged some thirty-plus years later), the first
series of books I ever read was the
Pern series by Anne McCaffrey.
I don't know how I found it, to be honest. It may have come my way via Official First Friend of The Pond Vaucaunson's Duck, which means it probably came from the library of Vauc's father, Dr John. It may have been one of the many books I read when I visited mid-state Illinois. It's even possible I stumbled upon it on my own. However it occurred, I remember being utterly fascinated by the combination of ugly politics, high action, (what I now think of as shallow) characterization, and everywhere,
everywhere there be dragons.
Psychic dragons.
As a young'un, I totally loved the whole Pern universe. I inhaled the six books in the series (
Dragonflight,
Dragonquest,
Dragonsong,
Dragonsinger,
Dragondrums, and
White Dragon) as fast as they came my way, then read it again. And again, because I knew that the story was over. Then
Moreta: Dragonlady of Pern came out, and I thought I had died and gone to heaven: it was a prequel, which meant plenty of time (and stories) for more books! I was slightly confused by
Nerilka's Story, the next book, because it told the same story as
Moreta, just from a different point of view... nowadays, I find that sort of thing to be very clever, perhaps an offshoot of my love for secondary characters (don't tell me what Kirk does, tell me what Redshirt #4 did).
And then, somewhere along the way, I "grew up." Oh, I still read the
Pern books when they came out, but the critic in me began to notice the fairly bland characters, the overly-simple plotting, the
incredible amount of Mary-Sue-ing and on and on. I began to think of McCaffrey's world as one for a younger Me. I was excited to have
The Masterharper of Pern come out, as it finally filled in the backstory of my favorite character of the universe, Robinton. Then... the books kept coming, but I stopped reading. Then they kept coming, but with Anne McCaffrey's son Todd's name on the cover, and I rolled my eyes. Not for
me, thank you very much. I had moved on to deeper, harder science-fiction.
Today, Anne McCaffrey passed away after suffering a massive stroke. While I haven't opened one of her titles in years, inside of me that scared nine year old mourns the loss of a very creative writer, whose books helped shaped the sci-fi reader I am today. Thank you, Anne.
UPDATE:
Friend GreyDuck has similar thoughts.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
12:00 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 480 words, total size 4 kb.
1
We have a somewhat similar reading history. I cut my teeth on Heinlein when I was 8 (Orphans of the Sky - the deeper implications in it didn't come to me until I re-reads it much later). I also read Pern, although it was my sister who bought them, so going to college was my excuse for stopping.
She had a huge effect on the genre in the '80's. I hope she is well-remembered today.
Posted by: Mauser at November 23, 2011 05:50 AM (cZPoz)
2
I've never been a fan of McCaffrey's writing, but I've always had a lot of respect for her as a writer. When I turned sixteen I was able to drive to a larger market than my hometown and visit real book stores. I'm sure this is exaggeration, but it can't be too far off: I remember shelf after shelf of McCaffrey, sometimes even entire endcaps dedicated to her books. I always picked up one or more and flipped through, although I have to admit it was mainly the gorgeous covers that always caught my eye.
So McCaffrey taught me a very valuable lesson, IMO, about marketing. Even if I never read any of her books, either her or her publisher, or both, were brilliant. I could not go through the Sci/Fi-Fantasy section of Waldenbooks or B. Dalton's without picking up an Anne McCaffrey novel.
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2011 09:09 AM (RalIr)
3
It seems appropriate that I should learn about Anne McCaffery's death this way, from Wonderduck. McCaffery was my first "favorite" author, and I was as captivated by Pern and its denizens as W.Duck. I don't remember if I actually introduced the book to him, but it's likely, as there was a lot of cross-pollination going on between our SF collections.
As I got older my views of the books developed along the same lines as W.Duck, and they "just didn't hold up" - but I was so attached to the characters that I waded through the treacle just to see what happened to them. And was surprised by my tears when I read about Robinton's death. I don't think I've read any more of the series since then, and probably won't, but I'm very glad it was there for me growing up.
W.Duck and I were up-to-our-ears in Pern back then, to the point of adding contractions to our names for a while. And we made up a thread-fighting board game using an old sewing board with a 1 inch grid traced on it (the same board we used for Fight in the Skies, but that's a different story.)
So I echo W.Duck's sentiment - thank you, Anne.
Posted by: V. Duck at November 23, 2011 04:21 PM (XVJDy)
4
I read a few of McCaffrey's stories in ages past, but I was too old and cynical by then to enjoy them much. However, my mother loves the Pern books, and I was happy to find them on Audible.com for her recently.
Posted by: Don at November 24, 2011 02:39 PM (VVUGF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 21, 2011
F1 on SPEED!: Brazil 2011
After 18 races across 17 countries, the F1 Circus pitches their tents for one last time for the final race of the season. This time, we find ourselves in the Brazilian city of São Paulo, racing on the track formally known as Autodromo Jose Carlos Pace, but more commonly known as Interlagos. Let's take a look at the track map:
It's no secret that I dislike the circuit at Hungary, nearly to the exclusion of all others. The one track I despise more than the Hungaroring is paradoxically one of the more popular races amongst the F1 drivers... this one. To be honest, my dislike of this circuit has nothing to do with the track itself. Indeed, this is the sort of layout I would quite like normally. A lot of elevation change (the run from Turn 1 to the end of Turn 3 is all downhill, and from Turn 12 aka Juncao to Turn 15 is all uphill), fast sweeping turns, a "technical" section that is relatively inoffensive... it's a challenging track, and one that's really quite appealing.
Except I hate it. It's completely irrational for me to dislike Interlagos, but there's an emotional aspect involved. As I've mentioned in the past, it always feels gray on race day (even when it isn't). The racing line for Turn 15 goes right through the pit-in, and with the positioning of F1's cameras at Turn 1, looking all the way down the front straight, it always looks like cars are going to crash into the pit lane barriers at 170mph. The pit out is the longest in F1, too. Furthermore, the track is positioned between two man-made reservoirs that provide water to São Paulo, leading to the name "interlagos," literally "between lakes." The pressure of the water has caused the surface of the track to wrinkle, leading to a very bumpy surface. A resurfacing in 2007 did not entirely solve the problem. All of these things make this a track I really don't like.
The fact that it's the final race of the season might have something to do with it, too.
Still, this is what we've got this week and it's not a Tilkedrome, that's gotta count for something. Pirelli is bringing a new soft tire compound to the race, one that they say is less conservative than the previous rubber. The medium compound will be the "hard" tire this time around. Interlagos isn't a particularly hard track on the tires, so expect the softs to last for a while... unless Pirelli has put the razor blades back into the compound like they did back at the beginning of the season.
Whatever way it works out, the good people at SPEED! will be bringing us the Legendary Announce Team all weekend long! Let's take a look at the broadcast schedule, shall we?
Friday:
6a - 730a: Practice 1, streaming
10a - 1140a: Practice 2, LIVE
Saturday:
7a - 8a: Practice 3, streaming
10a - 1130a: Quals, plausibly live
Sunday:
930a - 12noon: 2011 Grand Prix of Brazil, LIVE. There's also a replay from 11a-130p on Monday.
And then that's it until January, when we'll start to see F1 Pr0n with the rollouts of the 2012 cars. Of course, F1U! will be all over this weekend, with a desperation born of the end of the year. It helps that the whole weekend is at times where I can actually watch it live! We'll see you then!
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:09 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 580 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Big, big milestone for Massa, it's his 100th GP. I think the tires will be key but it's a tough track on powerplants so that'll be a factor. Nice not to get up the the middle of the night to see a race also. I look forward to your wrap-up of the season, you offer better analysis than most.
Posted by: von Krag at November 22, 2011 08:09 PM (XIY2m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 20, 2011
Photojournalism Teaser
A while ago, I said I was working on a "photojournalism project." It's taking much longer than I expected. It's also
costing more than I expected; supplies have run around $50 or so, and there's more coming... mostly batteries.
While you wait for this massive project to be completed, I'll leave you this teaser:
No, I'm not going to give you any point of reference for it... you'll just have to either wait or figure it out for yourself. Heh.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
06:35 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm going to guess it is a Bathroom Set and it's going to have something to do with rubber ducks. The only other alternative where I've seen a backdrop like that involves fetish photography....
Posted by: Mauser at November 20, 2011 07:00 PM (cZPoz)
2
Maybe he'll let who ever guesses what he's up to pick a blog topic for him to write about!
Posted by: Siergen at November 20, 2011 09:06 PM (OSPjN)
3
I still think he's going to create a photo-inventory of his entire duck collection.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 21, 2011 06:48 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: von Krag at November 21, 2011 04:42 PM (XIY2m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 19, 2011
Disaster Averted
As I mentioned in the comments of the post below, following what seemed to be a perfectly harmless link late last night/early this morning dropped me into a world of computer nightmare. To whit, my computer was infectorated with some nastyuglyick.
My anti-virus program is proving to be more turnstyle than blocker, I have to admit. To be sure, it notified me of the nastyuglyick, asked me if I wanted to block it... and then let it through anyway. That's not the first time that particular sequence of events has occurred, either.
Oddly, this nastyuglyick didn't really seem to do anything other than do annoying crepe. Much of that, I'm sure, is down to the wonders of Malwarebyte's Anti-Malware program, which did yeoman's work in cleaning and polishing my computer. I've done nine passes (including three full scans and one full scan in Safe Mode) with that greatest of disinfectorators, and I've been clean for the past six. Tack on a system restore to Thursday night, and I think a disaster has been averted.
Since last night/early this morning when the nastyuglyick first hit, there's only been one symptom... but it was a doozy, and I only just now finished fixing the last of the affected items. Somehow, the nastyuglyick changed every file folder to "hidden" status except for one: the programs folder, and everything in it. Every icon on the desktop was hidden as well, except for My Documents, the Recycle Bin... and My Computer. Everything else was missing, including everything under the START button. With the programs folder still being visible, I was able to run The King of Disinfectorators directly. With My Computer still being visible, I was able to get into Help & Support... which gave me a link to System Restore. And lo, it was cured.
Which doesn't mean that I trust that assumption, oh no. There's a Windows reinstall in my near future... fortunately, it's the week o' Thanksgiving, which means the Duck U Bookstore closes early on Wednesday... and I won't have to be back until the following Tuesday! I'm taking Monday off so I can devote my undivided attention to the last race of the F1 season on Sunday... all day, if need be. I suspect the reinstall will be done on Black Friday, that day that all retailers love and all retail employees hate. As I no longer work in "traditional" retail, I don't have to worry about it, and indeed for the past 7 years I've never left Pond Central at all on Black Friday... I refuse to inflict
that on myself for any reason, now that I don't have to.
So, a question: anybody have personal experience with Microsoft Security Essentials? Is it as good as the reviews suggest? Does it work?
Posted by: Wonderduck at
10:35 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 465 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I like it. One thing that's nice is that it doesn't louse up system performance. Another is that Microsoft updates the brain files constantly, and they can be downloaded for free.I can't say I know how good it is at protecting me, since I practice "safe hex" and haven't ever been challenged. But test reports I've read say it's very good.
Frankly, if you don't have it,you should get it.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 19, 2011 11:23 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 19, 2011 11:25 PM (+rSRq)
3
The removal tool also got a couple full runs today; they came up clean as well. I've practiced safe surf for a while, but I thought if one of my readers posted the link... *shrug*
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 20, 2011 12:12 AM (2YMZG)
4
I've been using Avast for many years now. I mostly practice "safe surfing", but I've hit a few bad files/sites along the way. Twice something managed to get past the defenses, everything else got identified and stopped.
My work laptop has MSE on it, and I like it enough that when I set up new machines for friends or family, that's what goes on them. I suspect when my current Avast licence expires, I'll switch to MSE.
I'd be curious what ickybad got you, the professional stuff tries hard not to make a nuisance of itself so you don't realize its there and get rid of it, and some kiddy that's just trying to be obnoxious and mess up your computer is rarely good enough to get past up-to-date security.
Posted by: David at November 20, 2011 01:28 AM (Kn54v)
5
David, it shows up in MBAM's quarantine folder as Trojan.FakeAlert (three times), Trojan.Agent.Gen, Exploit.Drop, and six instances of PUM.Hijack.StartMenu.
I'm using Trend Micro's AntiVirus plus Spyware, and to say that I'm not impressed with it is... well... an understatement. I might just switch to MSE ASAP, even though I've got six months left on my TM license.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 20, 2011 01:43 AM (2YMZG)
6
Oh, crap. THAT one. I've added "attrib -h -s -r" to my arsenal of required malware-fighting commands... and the first couple of times that our usual cleanup routine of "blow out the temp directories, that's where the malware usually lives" bit us in the ass since that's where the shortcuts had all been moved to, yeah, we had some angry clients then.
I want all these extortionware spyware adware jackasses strung up by their unmentionables. Every last one.
Posted by: GreyDuck at November 20, 2011 10:14 AM (eHm8o)
7
Trend let you down. There's no good reason to stay with it, license or no license.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 20, 2011 11:03 AM (+rSRq)
8
How did this get through? I thought browsers were supposed to be all nicely sandboxed....
Personally, I like to keep "NoScript" running in Firefox to have more control over what websites are allowed to do on my computer, as well as Flashblock. I also run Spyware Search and Destroy and AVG Free. I've been clean for years now.
(If I'm really suspicious of a site, I can turn to my old 8.6 Mac and Netscape 4.7, but these days that reads almost nothing on the web.)
Posted by: Mauser at November 20, 2011 03:18 PM (cZPoz)
9
That's interesting.
One of my co-worker's computers suffered a virus with similar behavior this past week. (Everything in Programs and Desktop was hidden.)
I think it was designed to be used on people who don't keep 'MyDocuments' or 'MyComputer' on the Desktop, but use the Start Menu to get to those entries. (Last few times I installed XP on anything, I had to manually switch to Classic Start Menu, and manually add 'MyComputer' to the Desktop.)
I don't know what else this virus was designed to do. Since my co-worker isn't the kind of guy who'd play with the game linked on the earlier post, my first guess is that the virus was spread by an embedded-ad-server.
What scares me is that a better-written virus (silently pwn a machine for use in a botnet, set up a spam-generating zombie, or some such) usually don't involve such obvious vandalism. A virus set up to probe the defenses of a network might not be visible to the average user. But such viruses can spread in the same way.
Posted by: karrde at November 20, 2011 03:54 PM (thI7w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 16, 2011
Canards dans l'animation: Je ne parle pas francais
-Wakfu, S02E14
Now that, my friends, is one smug looking duckie. As one would expect from a floating convenient censorship device. Not that he doesn't have reason to be smug...
...after all, rubber duckies get to hang out in bathtubs with teh hawt chix0rs.
Yes, he has a reason to be smug.
Interesting show, this
Wakfu. Or, more correctly, interestingly animated show. From what wikipedia says, it's all Flash-based, yet it's much better than any Flash cartoon coming out of the US. To be honest, if I didn't know better I'd say it's animated the same way as any anime, just with a more cartoony look. A look that fits the tone of the series, I might add... though since I've only seen the one episode, I'm hardly an expert on the thing. A fun way to spend 20 minutes, though.
(tip o' le chapeau to Mauser for the pointer!)
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:58 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You're very Welcome. Personally I love the show.
I first ran into one of the artists on DeviantArt, who had done the character designs for a game called Dofus, then the MMORPG Wakfu that followed. Beautiful stuff. French artists have a rather distinctive style.
Then I found out there was a cartoon based on it. I know it's CGI, but I'm not sure if it's flash based. Probably something more advanced.
The first season is highly recommended. The Big Bad has one of the most unusual and unique motivations I've ever seen. And there's some serious badassery in the fight scenes, as well as humor.
The only downside is that each season (of 24 eps) is marred sometime in the middle with a three-episode Arc about some kind of Soccer/Rugby/Calvinball sport in the world.
But all in all, it's brilliantly and cleverly written, and the TL that I have on hand does a pretty good job in dealing with the numerous French puns. And there are some very sexy secondary characters too. Although this was the first time I saw a Duck.
(Also, if it helps, a Kama is the name of the gold coin that is the currency of the world. And Ruel is from a "race" known for ruthless pursuit of wealth. (But it isn't an ethnic stereotype.) And Triestepan is from a race known for brave and heroic warriors who are also incredibly dense.).
Posted by: Mauser at November 17, 2011 03:30 AM (cZPoz)
2
I couldn't remember that scene from Wakfu, and I would have - hey, new episodes! It's been a while.
Have you been watching it or did you just pick up that episode? The first season of Wakfu started slow but (as Mauser notes)
ended up awesome.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 17, 2011 10:28 PM (PiXy!)
3
Oh, and if you haven't been following Wakfu, be glad that you didn't come in on the
teh hawt chix0rs a couple of episodes ago. Be very very glad.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 17, 2011 10:30 PM (PiXy!)
4
(Reads to the end of the post, answers own question....)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 17, 2011 11:54 PM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 18, 2011 02:31 AM (2YMZG)
6
Hmm. I thought I'd been reading your blog for several years, but since I don't recall either of your posts about Duck Duck Go, maybe I was still only a sporadic reader (just following links to occasional posts).
Glad to hear that you both own and enjoy it! Would you be interested in one of the sequel games? There are a couple already available.
Posted by: Hypozeuxis at November 18, 2011 10:09 AM (KvnlP)
7
You know, it suddenly occurred to me that he might be an African duck. More particularly, the Ubangi tribe - the ones who put the plates in their lower lips, er, bills.
Posted by: Mauser at November 19, 2011 01:51 AM (cZPoz)
8
Hypozeuxis' comment that I referred to has been removed because one of the links included gave my computer a virus. It's reproduced below with the links removed:
Only sort of related, but today I ran into a board game that uses
duckies, and in fact has commissioned a lot of custom designs and allows
you to choose the ones in your set:
(refers to Duck Duck Go)
Even though it is themed as a kid's game, it has been well received
among serious board gaming groups - as an example, here's a review from
Board Game Geek (which is THE site for board-game related information). (linked to review)
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 19, 2011 10:28 AM (2YMZG)
9
His link about a duck-based board game gave you a virus? You mean you've been infected with...the bird flu?
Posted by: Siergen at November 19, 2011 03:40 PM (xZ196)
10
I'm ignoring you, Siergen.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 19, 2011 10:39 PM (2YMZG)
11
I'm really sorry about the bad link... I got the URLs directly from
Google, and talked with the website owners (real nice people) at the
board game convention I was at last week.
I suspect their sysadmin-fu is significantly weaker than their
boardgame-fu (which is mighty) and bad guys deposited crepe on their
site.
Posted by: Hypozeuxis at November 21, 2011 11:22 PM (5eWak)
12
Oh, BTW, did you notice the other duck-thing at 4:45? (I know the Sadida Songstress before that was a little distracting.)
Posted by: Mauser at November 27, 2011 05:24 AM (cZPoz)
13
Coin, coin! (That's "quack, quack" en francais). Hee
Posted by: Colleen at November 28, 2011 11:01 PM (yjcgx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 15, 2011
Lassitude
I find I just don't have much in the way of spare spare time these days. I'm working on a huge bit of photojournalism and playing
Civ V and getting the Duck U Bookstore through inventory and playing
Civ V and reading 3000 pages of fiction and playing
Civ V and trying to catch up on my anime and playing
Civ V and you get the picture (and playing
Civ V). Inventory was today, so that'll loosen things up a bit; I won't be coming back to Pond Central as exhaustipated as I've been.
The fiction came as something of a surprise, as other than the
Haruhi Suzumiya light novels, I've not done much "casual reading" the past few years. What happened was that we got a shipment of remaindered books at the Bookstore, including a copy of
Off Armageddon Reef by David Weber... for $3.99. I picked it up, started reading... and kept reading. I then picked up the next three books in the series and read those, too. I finished the fourth book last night, so that'll loosen things up a bit. I won't be coming back to Pond Central exhaustipated and craving another fifty-odd pages.
The photojournalism... well, you're just gonna have to wait for that one. On the Anime front, I'm watching
Fate/Zero and
Ben-To as they come out, and I'm casually finishing up
Yuru Yuri and
iDOLM@STER from last season.
Ben-To has turned out to be the surprise hit of the Fall... a surprise to everybody but me. From the moment I
heard of the concept, I loved it.
So I'm sorta not focused on the blogginating at the moment. That should change soon, but unless CXT coughs up his topic from winning the last Mystery Ship contest, I'm not looking hard for anything to write about. That's okay,
Civ V is waiting...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:31 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 309 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I'm working on a huge bit of photojournalism
hmmmmm.....
Posted by: brickmuppet at November 15, 2011 09:29 PM (EJaOX)
2
Weber's Safehold series is interesting. It's starting to drag a bit in the later books, but still good stuff. If you like his writing and this concept, several of the ideas used in Safehold originally appeared in The Heirs of Empire, the third book in the Dahak trilogy. Same concept of high-tech people fighting a war on a primitive planet, but the book is split between the kids stranded on the planet and the imperial intrigue back home that resulted in them being stranded, plus other fun tidbits. Not as developed as the Safehold stuff, but much faster paced, etc. Heirs isn't in the free library, but the first book, Mutineer's Moon, is:
http://www.webscription.net/p-291-mutineers-moon.aspx
Posted by: David at November 15, 2011 11:21 PM (Kn54v)
3
My guess is that he's making a photo catalog of every duck he owns.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 15, 2011 11:28 PM (+rSRq)
4
FYI, I don't know if French Anime counts, but I just spotted a rare BLACK rubber duck in Wakfu, Season 2 Ep 14.
Posted by: Mauser at November 16, 2011 06:21 AM (cZPoz)
5
Thanks for mentioning
YuruYuri. Now I've got "yuruyurararara yuruyuri" going thru my head.....
Posted by: Ed Hering at November 16, 2011 01:13 PM (EQyr7)
6
Let me guess....You have playing Civ5?
Sorry about the delay but I have been too busy (I would use 'occupied' but it has sadly been besmirched by contemporary connotations.) to really think of a subject. Either that or I have been watching the Persona 4 anime.
C.T.
Posted by: cxt217 at November 16, 2011 08:15 PM (50e3V)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 13, 2011
F1 Update!: Abu Dhabi 2011
The grid formed up under a bright but setting sun for the penultimate race of the season with the familiar sight of Red Bull's Seb Vettel on pole. However, McLaren's Lewis Hamilton and Jenson Button obviously had the measure of the RB7. On this track where passing is a rarity, the run to the first turn could be decisive. Which car would lead the field? THIS is
your F1U! for the 2011 Grand Prix of Abu Dhabi.
*SHOCK: The lights went out, releasing the Thundering Herd to charge down to Turn 1. In what had to be the least surprising outcome ever, Vettel not only held the lead into the first bend, but quickly showed that everything we had thought about the McLaren's advantage over the Red Bull was false. As the Red Bull powered into and through the turn, it opened a four or five car-length advantage over Hamilton and we here at F1U! threw up our hands in disgust. And then...
We still haven't heard exactly what caused Vettel's right-rear tire to deflate, sending the Red Bull into a spin just as he turned into Turn 2. It may have hit a carbon-fiber shard left over from the earlier GP2 race. When the car accelerated off the line, it may have had enough grip to torque the tire off the rim. It may have had a slow puncture even before the race began. Whatever the reason, by the time Vettel got his car back on track for the slow, difficult crawl back to the pits, tire flailing at the rear bodywork the whole time, the entire field had gotten past. By the time he made it to his pit stall and officially completed his first lap, the field had mostly finished the second. Mechanics swarmed the Champion's car, but a fast and thorough inspection of the right-rear made it clear that the damage inflicted by the shredded rubber was too bad to allow the RB7 to continue. Seb Vettel had retired from a race for the first time this season.
*AWE: With Sebby out of the picture, the mantle of "dominating leader" fell to Lewis Hamilton. By the end of the first lap, he had a 2.5 second lead over the Ferrari of HWMNBN who got into a scrap with Jenson Button for second place, aiding Hamilton's attempt to pull away. Once things settled down, it became clear that the McLaren would not be headed in any way. Farther back, Jenson Button fell to 4th place, passed by Mark Webber, when his KERS unit failed. While he was eventually able to get it working again, for the rest of the race he would wind up having to reset it every two or three laps. Back up at the front, it was obvious that we were looking at a strategy race.
*PITS: With Lewis Hamilton able to open a lead but not able to run away and hide, any excess time spent in the pits would be crucial. Of course, pit stops have always been important in F1, but it's been rare this season for the pit crews to be decisive. At a track where a pass was difficult to pull off, and even harder to make stick, time lost or gained in the pits would be a bonus beyond horsepower's abilities to create... or make up. As it turned out, that's exactly what occurred: cars that had quick stops were able to maintain their positions, and those with poor stops lost position. When Button had a good first stop but Red Bull had an uncharacteristically slow one for Mark Webber, Webber fell out of the race for third place. As it turned out, he never recovered, even with the team switching him onto a three-stop strategy... with the third stop, for the mandatory run on the harder of the two tire compounds, coming on the final lap. On the second round of stops, HWMNBN stayed out two laps longer than Hamilton, trying to open up enough of a gap to jump the McLaren for the lead. Any sort of gap he had been able to create was thrown away by a methodical, safe... and slow... stop from the Ferrari mechanics. Where McLaren, Mercedes and Red Bull routinely spit out stops in the 3.5 second range or even faster, it took Ferrari 4.5 seconds to service HWMNBN. Going into the stop, he had maybe a 50/50 chance to keep the lead. Coming out, Hamilton had easily gone past, regaining the lead and holding it for the rest of the race.
*ENDING: The rest of the race was somewhat anticlimactic. Hamilton took his third victory of the season by over eight seconds over HWMNBN. Jenson Button had managed to keep his recalcitrant KERS unit functional enough to take third, some 20-odd seconds behind the leader. Mark Webber looked like he was going to have a tough time finishing fourth; his lead over 5th place Felipe Massa was right on the edge of the "pit delta", the amount of time it took to drive into the pits, get serviced, then rejoin the race. The delta time was 20 seconds, and he had almost exactly that much of a lead. But then Massa made the matter moot by spinning and handing Webber 15 seconds to play with. Somewhere in the Red Bull compound, a bemused Seb Vettel could only wonder what could have been...
*DRIVER OF THE RACE: HWMNBN. Hamilton had the better car, the better pit crew, and the better strategy. Yet he just could not dispose of the Ferrari driver, who hung grimly just off the tail of the McLaren, never letting him get free and clear. All of this was done with a Ferrari that wasn't as fast or nimble as his opponent. Probably one of the most impressive drives for second I've seen in a long time.
*TEAM OF THE RACE: McLaren. When Sebby went away, the boys from Woking knew they had a chance to play Bigfoot... and they took it. Even a balkly KERS unit in one of their cars didn't prevent them from getting both drivers on the podium.
*MOVE OF THE RACE: To be honest, it's hard to give this award today. There just wasn't all that much passing of note. We suppose we'll have to give it to both Mark Webber and Jenson Button, for their duel on Lap 3. Button led the pair into the long long straightaway. Webber got to use the DRS and just barely managed to get past the McLaren when they swooped into the chicane. However, there were TWO DRS zones today, and now Button got to use it to counter-attack... and immediately blew Webber's metaphorical doors off. Highly entertaining, but not exactly dramatic. A tepid "Meh" to the Abu Dhabi track, and a "meh" MotR.
*MOOOOOOOO-OOOOVE OF THE RACE: Another "meh" for this award. There just wasn't that much bad driving occurring. The most bovine maneuver had to be Felipe Massa's spin when he had a chance to finish fourth.
To be fair, he did have some damage to the right element of his front wing from running over some debris, and he was on the harder tires. A spin is a spin, however, and it did kill any hope he had of his best finish of the season, so Felipe Massa: A Moooooo is you!
*SELECTED DRIVER QUOTES OF THE RACE:
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
10:54 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1723 words, total size 11 kb.
November 12, 2011
Ducks In Anime:
-Hidamari Sketch x SP Ep02
I'm a firm believer in the magic of rubber duckies. Really, there's nothing a rubber duckie can't improve. I'm glad the folks at SHAFT agree with me, at least as far as
HidaSketch goes.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:36 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was about to challenge your assertion that "there's nothing a rubber duckie can't improve". However, an unfortunately successfully Google search proved me
uncomfortably wrong...
Posted by: Siergen at November 12, 2011 10:20 PM (sOpcO)
2
I'm going to assume that's a Rub My Duckie you've linked to.
*checks*
Yup. NOTHING a rubber duckie can't improve.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 12, 2011 11:50 PM (2YMZG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
F1 Quals: Abu Dhabi 2011
Now THAT'S how you do a qualifying session. Let's get right to it; here's the provisional grid for the 2011 Grand Prix of Abu Dhabi:
Pole #14 on the season for Seb Vettel, tying the record held by Nigel Mansell. That's impressive enough, but how he did it today was the real story. To be blunt, this should have been Lewis Hamilton's pole. He had been fastest in two of the three practice sessions and in the first two quals periods. When Jenson Button crossed the line on his final hot lap in Q3, Hamilton was just a few seconds behind him on the track. It came as no surprise when Button's pole time fell to Lewis, though the .009 second time differential did cause some raised eyebrows and amazed chuckles here at Pond Central. And then the cameras cut to Seb Vettel.
Red Bull had gotten him out last for the final run to pole, and he had clear track in front of him. While he'd been quick in Q1 and Q2, it wasn't the normal Red Bull Dominating Performance
®... you never got the feeling that he had something in reserve. It seemed like Vettel had been getting the most out of his car could give today, and for whatever reason it just wasn't as good as the McLarens.
But then Vettel began his final hot lap. The first two sectors were good, but nothing that would put him on pole. Third, maybe. In the previous two races at the Yas Marina Circuit the Red Bull chassis always stood head and shoulders above everybody else in the final sector, but not this year. The McLarens had been trading purple numbers between themselves for Sector 3 all weekend. Everything pointed to Vettel having no chance to be on pole. And then Vettel was perfect. That's the only way to describe that final sector... the perfect line, catching just the right amount of curb, putting just the right amount of pressure on the brakes and gas pedals, the absolute minimum of steering input used, gears changed at exactly the right moment. When he entered Sector 3, he was nearly .2 of a second behind Hamilton's pace. When he exited, he had pole by .141 seconds. Truly astonishing, and after seeing it I wondered how he didn't have 18 poles this season. However, and this is an important note, his pole lap was still slower than Hamilton's fastest lap in Q2. The McLaren and the Red Bull cars are, for all intents and purposes, equal. It should come down to the best driver between Hamilton, Vettel and Button for the race... and I'm not sure that doesn't mean Jenson Button won't win. We'll find out on Sunday!
You'll note that Rubens Barrichello did not turn a timed lap in Q1. He had an oil leak in his Cosworth engine, his seventh of the season's allotment of eight. The team wants him to have a fresh engine for Brazil, so to protect the seventh engine they decided not to put any extra avoidable stress on it. This decision brings up an interesting statistical note. Barrichello has made 330 starts in his F1 career, far and away the most in F1 history... and tomorrow will be the worst starting position he has ever had, either 23rd or 24th, depending on if he is placed ahead of, or behind, his teammate Vicar Maldonado who has a 10-spot grid penalty. Rubens has driven for some truly, epically bad teams: Honda, Jordan, Stewart. In some of those years, there were 28 cars on the grid. He's never been this low at the start ever.
In any case, we might just have ourselves something of a race tomorrow. F1U! will be all over it, see you then!
Posted by: Wonderduck at
12:17 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 797 words, total size 18 kb.
1
One more race after this one, and a chance for Vettel to set a record for poles. I wouldn't want to bet that he doesn't do it.
I hope he's enjoying this season, because he's never going to have another one like it. Just no way that the stars will ever again align so firmly in his direction.
Certainly he's making a lot of his own luck. No question that he's one hell of a driver. But so many other things have gone his way which aren't really under his control that it's almost beyond belief.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at November 12, 2011 05:53 PM (+rSRq)
2
Betting against Vettel this year has proven to be a great way to lose money, no doubt.
Posted by: Wonderduck at November 12, 2011 08:57 PM (2YMZG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 11, 2011
F1 Practice: Abu Dhabi 2011
A sunny early evening at Abu Dhabi greeted the F1 Circus as they took to the circuit for Friday's second practice, and it appears that something unexpected has occurred. The combination of Pirelli tires and a race run in both day and night may not be the most awesome thing ever. Everything was fine and dandy while the sun was up and the track was warm... but when night fell and the asphalt began to cool, the Pirellis just sort of surrendered any vestige of grip they may have had.
First, Mark Webber looped his Red Bull underneath the hotel. Then his teammate, the reigning Driver's Champion Seb Vettel, lost it heading into Turn 1, sliding all the way across the vast expanse of runoff area until he gorked his car into the SAFER-like barriers. He was unhurt, but the right side of the Red Bull was toast. About ten minutes after this, HWMNBN came racing down towards Turn 1 and not only did he lose it just like Vettel, he wound up planting his Ferrari into virtually the same
place as the Red Bull. In the Spaniard's case, he wound up going into the barriers backwards, causing untold amounts of damage to the hazard flasher. Throw in Felipe Massa nearly reaching the barrier in P1 and Lewis Hamilton nearly having an exciting moment in P2, and you start to notice a trend here.
Other than that little bit of data, the other interesting thing that crawled out of the Abu Dhabian desert is that neither Red Bull was particularly fast around the track today. Jenson Button lead the way in P1, Hamilton in P2... with the two Red Bullies ending up 5th and 6th. I've always said you can't trust practice times, and I'll stand by that statement, but you don't usually see a Red Bull a full half-second behind the leader in
any session for
any reason. I'll keep an eye on this, but for some reason I'm still expecting to see Sebby on pole after Q3 comes to an end on Saturday.
Meanwhile, we learned that Sauber's Pastor Maldonado is going to take a 10-spot grid penalty for Sunday's race. He's had to use a ninth engine on the season when you only get eight. Vaya con dios, Sauber and kiss that seventh place in the Constructor's Championship goodbye as Toro Rosso is looking awfully decent so far.
I mentioned earlier that the difference between 5th and 8th place in the Constructor's Championship is measured in the tens of millions of dollars. Oddly enough, the Legendary Announce Team was talking about that very topic today. While the actual numbers are shrouded in mystery and skullduggery, whispers suggest that last year, Red Bull was awarded some $85 million for winning the Constructor's Championship... and Williams' sixth place earned them a $60 million check from Darth Bernie's bank account. Some $660 million was paid out to all the teams in 2010. Understand this: $60 million would be enough to fund some
TEN high-ranking NASCAR teams for an entire year. Yeah, there's some money floating around F1.
Quals in the morning, see ya then!
Posted by: Wonderduck at
10:46 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 529 words, total size 3 kb.
Veterans Day 2011
At 11 o'clock in the morning of the 11th of November, 1918, silence fell across the Western Front. No shots rang out. No artillery rounds exploded. The cease-fire that would lead to the end of World War I had finally been declared. Around the world, people everywhere celebrated... and mourned.
In 1919, President Woodrow Wilson made November 11th Armistice Day, a national holiday. In his proclamation, he said:
"To us in America, the reflections of Armistice Day will be filled with
solemn pride in the heroism of those who died in the country's service
and with gratitude for the victory, both because of the thing from which
it has freed us and because of the opportunity it has given America to
show her sympathy with peace and justice in the councils of the
nations."
After World War II, a movement began in Emporia, Kansas, to turn Armistice Day into a holiday honoring all vets. In 1954, Congress officially replaced "Armistice" with "Veterans", and the day has been known as Veterans Day ever since.
Today, we honor all those who have served our country, and remember those who gave their lives in her service.
Without you, we wouldn't be able to do the goofy things we do today. Thank you.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
12:02 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 212 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I've lurked here for along time, initially coming because of the ducks in anime but stayed for the military history posts. I thought you could help me puzzle out a picture I just posted over on my anime blog.I decided to pay my respects to veterans this year with a post about my grandfather who was a veteran of WWII and I included some pictures that he had sent home during the war. The picture in question is the last one on the page and shows two German airplanes bolted together which is something I've never heard of before nor understand why they'd do something like that. Do you know what type of plane that was?
Posted by: thenullset at November 11, 2011 05:38 PM (X1zWP)
2
I posted an answer on your page, but the last photo you have shows a Mistel.
The Mistal was an attempt by the Luftwaffe to produce a weapon aimed at destroying high value targets which were too well protected by air defense for a manned aircraft to get through and conduct a precision attack. The nose of the bomber was replaced by an explosive warhead, and the entire 'aircraft' was piloted from the fighter. Once the Mistel was aimed at the target, the fighter would separate from the bomber and return home while the latter flew at the target, without having to worry about being deflected by anti-aircraft fire.
The guided anti-ship missiles used by the Luftwaffe (Like the Fritz-X and Hs-293.) were the other approach used by the Germans for the same mission.
C.T.
Posted by: cxt217 at November 11, 2011 07:53 PM (50e3V)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 10, 2011
Just For The Record...
I gots nuthin'. Nuthin', I tell ya. And so I'm posting to tell youse that I've got nuthin', so youse don't come here thinkin' I got sumthin', cause I gots nuthin'. I'll have sumthin' tomorra, and I hope to have sumthin' really swell on Saturday, but right now? Nuthin'. But I'm not gonna leave youse with nuthin', nuh-uh. If I leave youse with nuthin', youse might t'ink that nuthin's all I'm ever gonna have, so here's sumthin' to keep youse from t'inkin' dat.
See, dat's sumtin' fer nuthin'. One t'ing it ain't is nuthin' from nuthin'. 'Cause nuthin' from nuthin' leaves nuthin', and you gotta have sumthin' or you gots a song that ain't gots no melody, I wanna sing it to my friends. Will it go round in circles? Will it fly high like a bird up in the sky?
See? Nuthin'.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:20 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 1 kb.
178kb generated in CPU 0.096, elapsed 0.5206 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.4945 seconds, 415 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.