Bathtub Battles
A few weeks ago, the players of World of Warships were asked to fill out a survey about how they felt about the game. For the most part, it was all the usual stuff: "would you recommend the game to your friends?", "what do you like about the game?", you know the drill. One of the final questions was "what don't you like?" I'm sure most of my response was echoed by others: destroyers (and torpedoes in general) are waaaaaay too overpowered, too many "paper warships", why Soviet ships and no Royal Navy... and at the end, I tacked on "Oh, and not enough rubber ducks. You really should do something about that."
It appears that the producers listened. It's still a combat game, it's just that now you've got toy ships floating in a bathtub firing... things... at each other. With rubber ducks as terrain. There are other things in the tub, too, but who cares about them?
First I'm partially to blame for Rio: Rainbow Gate! getting a US release, now there are rubber duckies in WoWS? I need to use this power only for good...
I still sink just as readily in this version of the game as I do in the regular game, that's for sure. But hey! Rubber ducks! Thanks, Wargaming!!!
5
Yes. There are a couple rubber ducks, beach balls, and a few other large floating toys that serve as island cover.
There is a stark dichotomy between the sounds your toy boat makes when delivering fire and receiving it. It's all cutesy boops and bops until you take a sparkling star in the superstructure. Then it's explosions, fire, and the default narrator shouting in your ear.
Posted by: Will at April 01, 2016 11:36 AM (yh0SO)
World of Tanks finally unveiled its April Fools mode, and it's a brain-hurting monowheel sort of ball tank on the Moon thing. The physics is really bizarre.
Posted by: Mauser at April 01, 2016 09:46 PM (5Ktpu)
F1 on TV: Bahrain 2016 (UPDATED)
From Australia's circuit within a public park, the F1 Circus now finds itself in the middle of a desert. The Sakhir circuit is much the same as it's been in past years... the artillery emplacements are gone, the machinegun nests have been filled in, the tanks no longer use the end of the pit lane to repair their treads... so we should probably just look quickly at the map:
No change, as I said. Even politically there's been no change, as Bahrain is one of the places where the 'Arab Spring' movement was crushed, with military help from Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Nowadays, the Bahrani government is still in ham-fisted mode, apparently arresting four US journalists for trying to cover the fifth anniversary marches last month. And so it goes.
Other than that, the circuit itself is grippy (thanks to asphalt imported from Wales), fast, and pretty much flat. Wind can be an issue, as can sand since its in the middle of a desert. Rain is not something you'd expect, though it did rain on Monday; one of the teams' twitter feeds had pictures of their equipment sitting in a soaked pit lane.
Before I get into the "this is why I didn't say anything about it" bit, here's the broadcast times for the race weekend, featuring the Legendary Announce Team! All times Pond Central, of course. Friday
10am - 1130am: Practice 2 live on NBCSN Saturday
10am - 1130am: Quals live on CNBC Sunday
930am - 1230pm: 2016 Grand Prix of Bahrain live on NBCSN
As always, check your local guides for times... I have conflicting information on when the actual race is on-air.
Now then... remember that debacle of a qualifying format from Australia? And people were saying that F1 would be reverting back to the "old" way of quals? Yeah, about that... it was wrong. We've got the same elimination format again for Bahrain and (possibly) beyond... and since the alternative was a "reverse grid" lineup, where the top eight qualifying cars would be moved deep into the grid, we should probably be happy about it.
One thing I've learned over the years of covering F1 in whatever way you call this thing is that if it isn't being said by the FIA, it isn't real yet. And while the best thing to do with this qualifying format is to take it back behind the barn and shoot it, we're stuck with it for at least one race more. At least it'll be at a decent time. See ya soon!
UPDATE: Fernando Alonso is not being allowed to drive in this race. He failed medical tests today, stemming from a fractured rib suffered in his accident at Australia. He'll be retested before the next Grand Prix, in China. Until he passes, McLaren has tabbed Stoffel Vandoorne, the team's reserve driver (and reigning GP2 champion), to take his seat.
Flirtin' With Disaster
It's been five years, three months and nine days since I last had a cigarette... not that I'm counting or anything, because I'm not. I only figured out exactly how long its been for the sake of this post. Knowing that bit of information, combined with the post's title, should give you an idea of what's coming.
Fortunately, it's not as bad as you think... I didn't have a smoke. Let me repeat myself: I did NOT smoke a cigarette or any other device intended for the partaking of tobacco.
I only want one about as badly as I've ever wanted anything in my life. Its a damn good thing I'm taking a personal day from work tomorrow, otherwise I'd never be able to resist bumming one from a coworker.
It's not like I want to go back to the bad breath, the smelly clothes, the lack of taste and smell, the stained teeth, the ever-empty wallet, and the lack of wind. But dear heavens above, none of that matters right now.
I'm NOT happy about this. Hopefully the craving will dissipate overnight. Wingtips crossed.
1
If it comes to it, grab a vapor pipe instead. Better for ya and much better-smelling to boot. We've got a few guys at work who vape instead of smoking and it's helped them a lot.
Posted by: Avatar at March 30, 2016 03:18 AM (v29Tn)
2
Stay strong, man... and enjoy that personal day.
Posted by: GreyDuck at March 30, 2016 07:26 AM (rKFiU)
3
It's incredibly hard to be around other smokers when you're a former smoker. An ecig may actually be a good solution. It replicates the behavior without the negatives.
Vaping would be a terrible mistake; it gets you back addicted to nicotine.
I stopped drinking 23 years ago. Occasionally I find myself yearning for Anchor Porter again, and can even remember how it tasted. Or a fine cabernet. But I won't ever start again, even once, because soon I'd be back to binge drinking.
If you quit, the only way to be successful is to really quit. Totally. Forever. No exceptions, no special occasions, nothing.
5
I don't think any of the self-contained ecigs come with 0% nicotine juices. You'd want to get something like a Halo Triton and some non-awful flavor of nicotine-free juice, perhaps a coffee or chocolate.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at March 30, 2016 05:55 PM (CLiR9)
6
I'm not sure about mine, pretty sure they had nicotine. It helped me get through the worst cravings when I quit. Thankfulky, they were dissimilar enough from smoking cigs that I didn't adopt it as a separate habit.
7
I'm pretty sure that vaping would get me back into smoking pretty damn quickly, as I'd go back to the old movements and positions without any of the zoom. Hell, I've thought about getting one so I can have a convenient way of getting "smoke" into some photographs I want to take... but have held off because I know it'll lead to the real thing almost immediately.
Posted by: Wonderduck at March 30, 2016 08:17 PM (KiM/Y)
8
As someone who basically had a dip of Copenhagen in between my gums and lower lip from waking to sleep for 25 years and has not had one for the last ten + years.
Don't use any nicotine of any strength.
Occasionally I will get a very strong urge to have a chew.
I have resisted, so far.
And every now and then I will dream of having a chew, in those dreams I can taste, smell and even get the rush from the chew.
The hooks are deep with tobacco.
Posted by: jon spencer at March 30, 2016 08:37 PM (LtOnR)
9
I'm a firm believer that the only valid reason to be smoking is that you are on fire. And the last time I had a friend who quit, then tried to sneak a smoke in my presence, I responded appropriately, with most of the contents of a fire extinguisher. His immediate response was not favorable, but the treatment seemed to work...
Posted by: David at March 30, 2016 11:56 PM (qFBUY)
Memories Of A Time Long Ago
Did anybody here read OMNI magazine? I did, quite a bit. I remember it mostly for the science-fiction stories, some of which were quite good, but the occasional article stuck in my mind as well. For example, I'm sure the first time I heard about the Hubble Space Telescope was in the pages of OMNI, years before it ever made it to space. This morning, after being awakened from a deep sleep by a text that was sent much too early, I remembered something I read 30 or more years ago...
It was an article about the coming environmental disaster, or the hole in the ozone layer, or how we were causing the next ice age, or something along those lines. Contained in the article was a chart showing what sort of prices we'd be looking at for common items... milk, bread, construction materials, gasoline (note: environmental disaster makes gas prices go down from current rates), metal plates, cars, that sort of thing... wait, what?
That seemed like an odd item to compare prices with, at least for the type of article we're talking about here. Everything else were common household goods, and then along comes "metal plates" and everything gets thrown into a cocked hat.
Then came this morning's text-message wakeup call, ruining a somewhat humorous dream about a world-wide raccoon shortage, but also for whatever reason reminding me of the OMNI article. And then it hit me: metal plates, not metal plates!
I was a very intelligent youngster, but I wasn't a smart kid... or adult apparently, since it's taken me 30-plus years to figure out "metal plates." Unfortunately, I've never been able to find that article again... maybe it wasn't in OMNI. National Geographic? Mad? It is a puzzlement.
I read OMNI many, many moons ago. Every once in a while, I get an inclination to try to find a back issue from the early '90s to re-read a short story that I never knew the name of it or its' author, but never had any luck doing so.
Posted by: cxt217 at March 27, 2016 02:00 PM (I/l1o)
2
Weirdly, I remember OMNI specifically for a list of oxymorons they posted, which included the lovely turn of phrase, "Everybody Generalizes."
Which isn't specifically an oxymoron, nor were half the other entries in the list, but it amused me nonetheless...
Posted by: GreyDuck at March 27, 2016 10:47 PM (rKFiU)
3
Funny you should mention OMNI - I tripped over it just last night while browsing Amazon. You can buy all the back issues in digital form for the bargain price of $7.99. Each.
Not sure who thought that would be a successful business model.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at March 28, 2016 07:01 AM (2yngH)
4
Ah, that would explain why the official free archive of every issue was taken down and replaced with the thoroughly forgettable omnireboot.com. Someone had A Clever Plan To Monetize Content. I suppose we'll have to wait for the bankruptcy auction.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at March 28, 2016 01:34 PM (ZlYZd)
5
My best friend all through school got OMNI, but I never did. I went to look it up since it was the current topic of discussion, and was flabbergasted to discover it was published by Bob Guccione.
6
I was never a devotee of Omni ("Science Fiction / Science Fact") but dipped into it on occasion, and it was often pretty good.
The magazine had bad timing on both ends of its life. They were born into a remarkable flowering of magazine-length science writing -- alas, the supply of such magazines exceeded the market.
Omni had solid enough backing (from Penthouse publisher and, on one occasion, unlikely fusion-energy patron Bob Guccione) to survive that, but then folded their tent about a year too soon. They'd run Internet-related nonfiction (as well as some influential early cyberpunk) when that was pretty state-of-the-art stuff, and were online early on.
In some superior parallel universe they might've hung on deeper into the era of popular and overtly commercial use of the Internet, as well as broadband to make a graphics-intensive online magazine more feasible, and become a good competitor for Wired...
Posted by: Ad absurdum per aspera at March 28, 2016 07:19 PM (blF4/)
7
The metal plate is a usual "France Is Bacon" story. It's usual in the sense that everyone has one. Mine are all Russian though. I remember how Russian version of Astrid Lindgren's Carlson used to say to me "pustyaki, delo zhe teyskoye" ("no big deal, teiski business") in the cartoon. For years I tried to puzzle out what business it actually was. It sounded like something with Roman roots, possibly having something to do with Tretean Court of Justice. It took me reading the actual book to realize that he meant to be saying "pustyaki, delo zhiteyskoe" ("no big deal, domestic affairs").
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at March 28, 2016 07:42 PM (XOPVE)
Random Anime Picture #114: Bleeeeeeeeeh!
-Konosuba, Ep03
So over at Ubu's place, and might I say that it's mighty good to see him blogginatin' with some frequency again, he was talking about this oddball show called, and I quote, "Kono Subarashii Sekai ni Shukufuku wo!"
As that's quite the mouthful, some bright spark shortened it to "Konosuba" and we'll leave it at that. Anyway, it's a sendup of the old "dead useless guy is brought back to life in another world to save it from The Evil" plot. In this case, dead useless guy is still useless, and the harem party he forms around him are ridiculously powerful... and totally useless.
Like the paladin Crusader that's so clumsy that she literally cannot hit anything offensively. She does, however make a great wall. Good thing she's a masochist. Or the wizard who is strong enough to cast the most powerful offensive spell, "Explosion." Except when she does, it uses all of her power for the entire day... can't even stand up afterwards. Oh, did I mention that it's the only spell she knows? Terrible against a single enemy... not bad against hordes of flying cabbages, however.
Why would you think I'd joke about something like that?
Then there's the Goddess. I mean that literally: she's an actual Goddess. She's great at using holy water for healing purposes, and for being eaten by giant toads, but otherwise? Dumb as a box of hair, and totally incompetent.
Then there's the lass up at the top of this post, Chris the Thief. She actually appears to be useful. We meet her at the beginning of Ep03, then the flying cabbages come and she disappears. Totally gone, and nobody seems to notice or care.
It's managed to keep my attention through three episodes... so there's that, I suppose. It's not high art, but it's okay.
I found KonoSuba to be the best of the winter season, in no small part because of how it plays with the tropes of the 'trap in another world.' It is much more amusing and entertaining than, say, Grimgar.
Posted by: cxt217 at March 26, 2016 08:20 AM (I/l1o)
2
I had nothing I wanted to watch this season until Ubu wrote about it. I pulled down the 10 episodes that were available and I'm starting on them.
Then out of sheer masochism, I pulled down the prequel to Muv-luv Alternative, and just in the first episode... The stupid... it burns! (I never posted the review I wrote, aside from timeliness issues, after re-reading it, it made no sense, even with liberal doses of sarcasm.)
Posted by: Mauser at March 27, 2016 12:27 PM (5Ktpu)
Chris was a good character. I wish she'd been in more of the show, but she was too competent to add to the party. Although, by the last episode, there's signs that the party might be gelling due to the MC figuring out ways to use them. This is probably a good thing; if they remained totally incompetent, the joke would get stale. Assuming they can stay out of prison for that last little bit of lesse`-majeste
Don't know if you caught the update, but a second season is in the works.
F1 Update: Australia 2016
The best weather of the race weekend greeted the F1 Circus as they rolled onto the grid for the inaugural race of the new season. As has been the case for what feels like forever, the Mercedes of Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg locked out the first row, with the twin Ferraris of Seb Vettel and Kimi Raikkonen right behind them. Could someone stop Hamilton, the reigning World Champion, or would he run away with the race and get the year off to a terrifying start? Or will someone stand up for the fans and dethrone the Brit? And what of the new team on the grid, America's Haas F1, how would they fare in their first race? THIS is your F1 Update! for the 2016 Grand Prix of Australia!
*LIGHTS OUT: In the past, it's been traditional to see the polesitting Mercedes to go stampeding away over the nearest hill, leaving everybody languishing in its dust, save for a grim-faced second Merc desperately trying to remain in contact. Not so today, as the start saw Seb Vettel make a glorious getaway as Hamilton appeared to bog down slightly. Vettel nipped right between the two Mercs, getting ahead of them both. Then the other Ferrari took advantage of Rosberg and Hamilton having a little spat in the first turn, moving into second while Hamilton dropped all the way down to sixth as a result. And, wonders of wonders, neither Ferrari seemed particularly threatened by the Silver Arrows, though they couldn't pull away from them, either. By Lap 10, Vettel had a three-second gap to the third-place Merc of Rosberg, and nine seconds on Hamilton in fifth. Good, but nothing like we often saw from the Constructor Champions last year.
*PIT STOPS... OR NOT: The first of the leaders to come in for new tires was Rosberg, on Lap 13 for soft tires. The next lap saw race leader Vettel come in for super-softs, exiting the pits just barely ahead of the newly-shod Rosberg. If you were ever curious what sort of difference tire compounds could make, we saw it here. While Vettel was on cold tires and Rosberg's were up to temp, the super-softs were almost immediately ready to go; the Mercedes tried gamely, but just could not hang with the Ferrari. In the space of a few turns, a gap between the two opened and just kept getting wider and wider. Up ahead was the other Mercedes, now in the lead as Hamilton tried to stay on track on worn tires to strategize his way past the surprising Toro Rosso of Embryo Verstappen (who pitted a few laps earlier). When Vettel retook the lead, Hamilton pitted. Meanwhile, the Haas of Lettuce Grosjean had worked its way up to 12th and had to be considering a pit stop soon, while his teammate was only a position or two behind but under threat from the McLaren of Fernando Alonso.
*RED FLAG: Heading towards the right-hand Turn 3, Alonso had the Haas of Esteban! lined up for a pass. His plan was to swoop outside the American car, then he'd be in the better position into the left-handed Turn 4. Easy-peasey! Just as he began his swoop, Esteban!'s Haas kicked into ERS-charging mode, and the drag on the power-unit slowed the car more than Alonso was expecting. The McLaren's right-front wheel clipped the left-rear of the Haas, and Alonso was sent into the outside wall at high speed. Rebounding, the car quickly dug into the gravel trap protecting Turn 3, rolled and got airborne... touching down again just short of the end of the trap. Of course, it dug in again, flipped end-for-end in mid-air, then ended up leaning up against a wall.
When Alonso slithered out of the inverted McLaren, he was understandably shaken, but mostly unharmed. Esteban! had a much easier ride, his broken Haas sliding to a sedate halt rightsideup in the middle of the kittylitter. Considering the amount of debris left behind by the two, it was an easy decision for Race Control to red flag the race.
*PAUSE THAT REFRESHES: Because of the red flag rules, teams were able to do work on the cars as they sat in the pit lane. For example, Mercedes reportedly changed Hamilton's nose, repairing some front wing damage suffered at the start. Everybody put on fresh tires as well, with Ferrari keeping their cars on the Super-Soft, and Rosberg joining Hamilton on Mediums. This clearly meant that Mercedes intended to no-stop the rest of the way while Ferrari would have to stop at least one more time. Super-Soft tires had zero chance of lasting the rest of the race... or even 20 laps, for that matter.
*...AND WE'RE BACK: There were no real surprises for the next handful of laps. No surprises, that is, until Kimi Raikkonen brought his Ferrari into the pit lane, trailing a thin plume of smoke behind him.
Surprisingly, there was no effort from the Ferrari pit crew to put out the fire licking just inches above their driver's head. It took a safety marshal strolling by with an extinguisher to put it out with a stream of foam. Very odd. Some laps later, it was clear that Vettel's tires were going off; he was losing time to the Medium-clad Mercedes. He switched to the Soft tires, plenty sturdy enough to last to the end of the race... but his pit crew botched the stop. A three-second stop might have gotten him out of the pits in close contact with Lewis Hamilton (who would have been promoted to second place). Instead, a screwup on the front-left tire change turned it into a six-second stop and any realistic chance of a race win went out the window.
*THE END: Which didn't mean that second place was out of reach. For the rest of the race, Vettel reeled in the Silver Arrow of Hamilton in second place, closing to within one second by Lap 52. As it turns out, though, the Ferrari pilot had chewed up his tires in the chase. After catching up, Vettel soon went off into the grass, losing four seconds or so with only one lap to go. This essentially ended the race; Rosberg led the way, followed some eight seconds later by his teammate. Vettel was a second or so behind Hamilton, and the Red Bull of Daniel Riccardio was in fourth, 24 seconds behind. Felipe Not Nasr Massa's Williams was in fifth, almost one minute behind the leader.
*OH, HIM?: The important question, however, was "Where was the Haas of Lettuce Grosjean?" He finished the race 12 seconds behind Massa in sixth place. In doing so, Haas F1 became the first new team to score points in their first race since Toyota in 2002 (also a sixth place finish). They also became the first American team to score points since Haas-Lola (no relation) in 1986. He was helped to this finish by making his sole tire change during the Red Flag period, meaning that he didn't actually make a pit stop during the race! Having said that, this was a legitimate finish for the car... it deserved to be around sixth place or so on pace and driver performance.
*SELECTED DRIVER QUOTES OF THE RACE:
"Four in a row now. It's becoming routine, ain't it Lewis?" - Nico Rosberg
"Thanks for running me off the road, teammate." - Lewis Hamilton
"Hey, guys, Ferrari's back, we're gonna beat you this year... guys? Stop arguing with each other and pay attention to me. Guys?" - Seb Vettel
"Oi, I'm Australian." - Daniel Ricciardo
"For a wonder, I'm not whining for once." - Felipe Not Nasr Massa
"Welcome to F1, Gene! This is a win for us!" - Lettuce Grosjean (note: real quote)
"When I stopped, I saw a little space to get out of the car and I went out quickly just to make sure my mum, who was watching on television at home, could see that I was okay. Oh, and AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!" - Fernando Alonso (note: mostly real quote)
"Races we have many, but life we have only one. I thank God we are all okay!" - Esteban! (note: real quote. Tweet. Whatever)
"I hate Australia." - Kid Kvyat. This is the second year in a row he has had a mechanical failure just before the race.
So that's it from Down Under. The next race is in two weeks at Bahrain. We'll see you then!
1
So Ferrari kind of did it to themselves. At least in the early season it looks like there will be real competition. Two bad pits for Ferrari, though...someone got yelled at in Italian.
2
I saw Alonso's crash. At first, you only noticed Esteban's car, that lump of metal stuck to the wall didn't even grab your attention as being a car. Then I saw the tires attached to it, and I was sure we'd lost a driver. Amazing that he just crawled out and walked away. That was probably one of those "I'm glad it happened so quickly, I never even had a chance to realize I should soil my suit." moments.
Posted by: David at March 20, 2016 10:32 PM (qFBUY)
3
Maybe it was because I was exchanging texts with Vaucaunson's Duck, but while I knew it was a bad accident, I was never concerned about Alonso's life.
Simply, it felt like we've seen worse.
Posted by: Wonderduck at March 20, 2016 10:37 PM (KiM/Y)
4
Maybe if I'd actually seen it happen, I wouldn't have been so freaked, but the video I saw showed the wreckage before we saw what caused it.
Posted by: David at March 20, 2016 11:31 PM (qFBUY)
5
It helped that by the time the announcers realized that there were in fact two cars off the track (Alonso's car being so mangled it was not readily identifiable as a vehicle from that angle!), Alonso was out and getting slapped on the back by Gutierrez. There wasn't that moment where you were going "man, is he still alive in there?"
Apparently the quals format is back to normal for Bahrain.
Was a pretty good race. Grosjean ran a clean and smooth run and benefited massively from the red (had he had to pit once, he'd have been outside the points), but even that would have been an accomplishment. If he hadn't had the speed in the car, he couldn't have kept what he had, that's for sure. A professional job, and a good demonstration of how much he's improved as a driver, as compared to the days when he was competing with Maldonado for most wrecks.
On the topic of professionalism, might we give Verstappen the sobriquet "Mad Max"? He was rather upset this weekend, first at a tire snafu and then at not being able to get around Sainz.
What do you think about the three tires? Was interesting to see some radically different strategies, but I don't know if it's a long-term net positive.
Posted by: Avatar at March 21, 2016 03:15 AM (v29Tn)
6
"Y'all kinda nonchalant about roasting your driver's head in its helmet, ain't ya?" Priorities, people, priorities.
So we might get a bit more of actual proper racing, just a bit, this season? That is, the quals idiocy couldn't have directly resulted in this better-race-than-expected, right?
Posted by: GreyDuck at March 21, 2016 07:24 AM (rKFiU)
7
I think Ferrari messed up even without the pit stop issues. Assuming they felt they couldn't beat the Mercs flat out on mediums vs mediums (ie, declaring we're going to the end, take the position on track), then I think softs would have been the better tire choice out of the red flag. Vettel probably could baby the softs to the end, but that would also leave them the option of matching a shift to supersofts if Merc does the same.
Posted by: ReallyBored at March 21, 2016 02:19 PM (ulGxe)
8
@ Avatar: re - the tires. Meh. One race is probably not enough to judge quite yet. If you held a loaf of rye bread to my head, I'd probably say it didn't hurt anything. And alas, I'm amused by calling Verstappen "Embryo." Just like I'm amused by nicknaming a driver after a questionable piece of Japanese animation.
@ GreyDuck: Yep! While that Quals format was a stupid, stupid thing, it didn't actually generate a grid that was particularly off-kilter. I mean, sure, Haas was hurt by it, as was Kid Kyvat, but... really, were we expecting greater things from Haas in their first quals session ever? I wasn't, not really. And it's not uncommon for one of the Big Teams to dribble something down the leg of their firesuit once in a while...
@ RB: Ferrari didn't seem to be happy with the Mediums all weekend... I think I remember hearing or reading somewhere that they couldn't get them up to temps. That would indicate that the Red Cars are relatively gentle on their tires, which means the Softs would have been the better choice. Still, I understand their thinking, and I actually applaud the audacity of the move. That it didn't work is unfortunate.
Posted by: Wonderduck at March 21, 2016 05:06 PM (KiM/Y)
9
It should have been good enough for 2nd, a respectable first foray with two Mercs on the grid; pit snafus happen, you can't plan against them.
Maybe the fire was a system to get the Iceman up to operating temperature?
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at March 21, 2016 11:03 PM (/lg1c)
10
@WD: Yeah, I can kinda see the thinking. Burn the supersofts off for maybe 10-15 laps to pick up a 15ish second lead, pit for softs and drop to second then run the old mediums down in the final 20ish. I dunno, though. It might also just be that they weren't sure Vettel could baby the softs to the end, in which case, yeah, that was probably the best chance at a win.
@Avatar: Eh, even without the pit snafu, going with SS out of the red flag meant that they would have to pit again. With Mercs on mediums, that meant Vettel needed to build a fairly large lead before the pit for the win. According to WD, Ferrari didn't like the mediums, so if, and this is admittedly a big if, Ferrari's testing showed that softs could last to the end then I think going out on softs gives them more options. OTOH, I wonder if they were burned by the race last season where Vettel was babying a set of tires that just catastrophically failed.
Posted by: ReallyBored at March 22, 2016 09:04 AM (ulGxe)
That's the only way to describe the new qualifying format, unless you want to use words like debacle, awful, failure, or what were they thinking?. Before we get into why Quals was an unmitigated catastrophe, let's take a look at the provisional grid for the 2016 Grand Prix of Australia:
Pos.
Driver
Team
Time
1
Lewis Hamilton
Mercedes
1:23.837
2
Nico Rosberg
Mercedes
1:24.197
3
Sebastian Vettel
Ferrari
1:24.675
4
Kimi Räikkönen
Ferrari
1:25.033
5
Embryo Verstappen
Toro Rosso
1:25.434
6
Felipe Not Nasr Massa
Williams
1:25.458
7
Carlos Sainz
Toro Rosso
1:25.582
8
Daniel Ricciardo
Red Bull Racing
1:25.589
9
Sergio Perez
Force India
1:25.753
10
Nico Hulkenberg
Force India
1:25.865
11
Valtteri Bottas
Williams
1:25.961
12
Fernando Alonso
McLaren
1:26.125
13
Jenson Button
McLaren
1:26.304
14
Jolyon Palmer
Renault
1:27.601
15
Kevin Magnussen
Renault
1:27.742
16
Sony Ericsson
Sauber
1:27.435
17
Felipe Not Massa Nasr
Sauber
1:27.958
18
Kid Kvyat
Red Bull Racing
1:28.006
19
Lettuce Grosjean
Haas
1:28.322
20
Esteban!
Haas
1:29.606
21
Rio Rollins Tachibana
Manor
1:29.627
22
Turbo Pascal Wehrlein
Manor
1:29.642
Pretty standard results, more or less. That Toro Rosso got both of their cars ahead of Red Bull is an interesting twist, but part of that performance has to be credited to Embryo Verstappen, who might be turning into a very skilled driver indeed. The McLarens showed signs that last year's nightmare is over by actually looking like they deserved to be on the track.
But let's get to the efalump in the room: the new quals elimination format. It was supposed to make things more exciting, but the exact opposite occurred. You saw a great rush at the beginning of each session as everybody went out to set a lap time before the elimination timer began ticking down... and then the Mercs and Ferraris, secure in their speeds, disappeared. It appeared that the teams had some confusion about how the new format worked, too... when the 90-second timer reached zero, whatever car was slowest was eliminated, even if they were on a flying lap. Previously, when clocks ran out (such as at the end of the session), flying laps counted. This means that timing is everything now... for example, a lap of Australia takes around 1:26 or so. Basically if you're not on your lap or about to start one when that 90 second timer begins, you're out of luck. That's what doomed Kid Kvyat, who was in the pit lane when the timer started on him. The two Haas cars were also badly hurt by this: Esteban! was on a serious flyer when his time ran out; his time would have bumped him up to eighth on the timesheet, plenty good enough to advance. Lettuce Grosjean was going even faster for the first two track sectors when the clock struck ":00" on him, much quicker that his teammate. He decided not to finish the lap at that point.
However, if you're the last one to be under the clock in a session, your final hot lap counts even if time runs out, just like before. Renault's Jolyon Palmer snuck his way into Q2 that way, relegating the Sauber of Sony Ericsson in the process (and causing confusion and annoyance up and down Pond Central). Q2 went down much the same way.
All of that was just prelude to the ridiculousness that was Q3. Basically, the eight cars that advanced to Q3 went out for one lap each, returned to the pits, and for all intents and purposes the session was over; the clock just hadn't run out yet. Oh, Nico Rosberg moved himself from fourth to second later, but there was nothing going on for the last five or six minutes. Hamilton busied himself sitting atop of the medical car, fans busied themselves thinking "WTF is going on?" and critics everywhere broke keyboards as they rushed to post scathing diatribes about the new format.
And they've got the right of it. Drivers, team principals, even Bernie Ecclestone have all come out calling the format "rubbish" and saying that F1 needs to go back to the knockout format again. At least then you usually had the drama of people being on track at the end of Q3.
Race late tonight... I'm unsure if I'll be able to stay awake for it, however: I coudn't manage the trick for Quals. We'll see what happens, F1U! tomorrow.
It was supposed to make things more exciting, but the exact opposite occurred. You saw a great rush at the beginning of each session as everybody went out to set a lap time before the elimination timer began ticking down... and then the Mercs and Ferraris, secure in their speeds, disappeared.
2
It's also really interesting that most of the teams had their cars come in next to one another on the grid. Was that partly because of the new qual format?
Broken Wonderduck
I kinda reached a break point last night. Something occurred that pushed me a little too far, and I just sort of... cracked, just a bit. I might be quiet for a little bit.
F1 on NBCSN: Australia 2016
And we're off! The 2016 Formula 1 season is just a few days away. As is traditional, the Circus is Down Under, raising its tents for the first race of the year. There's a new performer added to the show, and two major rule changes, so this'll be fun and exciting in ways we've not seen in a while! But first, let's look at the track map for the 2016 Australian Grand Prix:
To me, the track in Melbourne is almost like a security blanket. It's always been there, it's never changed, and it's just a swell place to have a race. Fast, but not fast fast. Twisty turns, but not ridiculously so. Tough, but fair. A great way to start the season, both for the fans and for the teams. The only bad thing about it is that it takes place at Inconvenient O'Clock, Pond Central Time, but at least Quals and the race bookend Saturday! Here's the broadcast schedule, brought to you by the Legendary Announce Team, NBCSN, and F1Update!: ask for it by name!
Wednesday
1030p - 1130p: Haas F1 - America's Return To The Grid, NBCSN Thursday
830p - 10p: Practice 1, live on NBCSN Friday
1230a - 2a: Practice 2, live on NBCSN Saturday
1a - 230a: Quals, live on NBCSN
11p - 2a: 2016 Grand Prix of Australia, live on NBCSN
Which brings us to the first bullet point of the season. There's a new team on the grid, and it's American.
Now Haas F1 is American the same way McLaren is British, or Renault is French... that is to say, "nominally." Every team on the grid is made up of people from around the world. Team Principal Guenther Steiner is Italian (name sure sounds German, though), the drivers are French and Mexican, and they've got bases of operations in England and North Carolina. But it's got the American flag on it, Gene Haas (the founder) is American, and that's all that matters. I'll be paying special attention to HaasF1 all season, and we'll be having a good ol' time with the good ol' boys from Kannapolis. They've already been impressive in pre-season testing; despite losing a front wing on the first day, and an entire day in second testing due to engine problems, they still turned more laps than McLaren and showed good pace the whole way. Promising, if nothing you can really hang your helmet on. Moving on...
There's been a couple of changes to the tire rules for the 2016 season. The first, and easiest to explain, is the addition of the Ultra-Soft tire compound to the old standbys of Hard, Medium, Soft and Super-Soft. Back when Pirelli was last providing tires to F1, qualifying was single-car-single-lap, go as fast as possible and damn the torpedoes. To get the maximum amount of speed, teams had qualifying engines, tuned to (reportedly) give as much as 1500hp at some circuits... at the price of being useless after only a few laps. Think of them as F1's version of a Top Fuel dragster's motor: one run, then a complete rebuild. However, those engines would be useless if you couldn't apply the power to the circuit, and thus was born the Qualifying Tire. If the qualifying engine had a short life, the Quals Tire had one equally as short, if not worse. Imagine marshmallows covered with velcro and slathered with superglue... lots and lots of grip, but no lifespan to speak of: one race lap was about it. The new Ultra-Soft tires aren't quite that bad, but only maybe by a few laps before they're scattered to the four winds.
The difficult rule change is how tires are allocated during the weekend. Before, Pirelli would bring two compounds to the track, and all teams had to use at least one of each during the race. The rules now state that Pirelli will announce three compounds for each race, and the teams get to choose how many of each compound they want (up to a maximum of 13 sets). The only catch is that the softest compound must be used during Q3 of Qualifying, and the drivers must have at least one set of the others for the race. If I'm reading the rules correctly, the drivers don't actually have to use both, just have them available. Oh, and they have to give back the softest tires before raceday. I think. For Australia, the compounds are Medium, Soft, and Super-Soft. If I've got these rules incorrect, please someone correct me, because they really are a bit vague.
Finally, there's a new Qualifying format. On the surface, it's quite similar... three Quals periods, knockout elimination, you know the drill. Except now, Q1 is 16 minutes long, and instead of removing the slowest five all at once, after seven minutes the slowest car will be eliminated, followed every 90 seconds by the slowest car remaining until the session is over. Thus, seven will be knocked out, and 15 go on to Q2. Q2 is 15 minutes long, and after six minutes the slowest car is removed, then every 90 seconds thereafter. That will leave eight cars for the final session. Q3 will be 14 minutes in duration, and after five minutes the slowest is knocked out. Again, another car will follow every 90 seconds until there are just two remaining. Those two will then go until time's up. Simple, right? I think the FIA is a little over their skis on this one... it might really be cool, but I have this feeling it's needlessly complex and will be hard to keep track of for the fans.
Well, we'll find out this weekend! Keep an eye out for the first F1Update! of the season on Sunday!
1
I'm not even going to attempt making sense of the tires thing, but I'm wondering: Why, do you suppose, did they fiddle with Quals? Does it improve something for the teams in general, for a particular heavyweight team, or for the viewing audience?
Posted by: GreyDuck at March 15, 2016 07:26 AM (rKFiU)
2
I'll make a stab at that - they've got long quals sessions, but the extra length wasn't being used by the teams. If you had a car that you'd expect to get to Q3, you did one hot lap in Q1 and then put it in the garage, unless the team wanted some kind of testing. You might not even do two hot laps in Q2. Now, you've got to get your car onto the track at the beginning of each session, lest you be the first one knocked out and have to start behind the back-markers.
On top of that, it might be a bit more successful in generating drama. Previously you'd have a whole pack kicked out at the end of each session, but especially in Q1 you pretty much knew who was going to be in that pack, and there wasn't any real drama about where they were within that pack exactly. Now you've got a reason for the announcers to pay attention to the guy in 21st - can he put a good lap together in time to pull ahead of the guy in 20th? Hopefully this will be more interesting than shots of an empty track and the announcers saying "everyone's waiting for the last five minutes of the session to set a time."
(On that note, the added drama for the back-markers ought to be good for them - screen time equals happier sponsors!)
Posted by: Avatar at March 15, 2016 12:35 PM (v29Tn)
3
IMO, the change to the qualifying format, like the driver helmet design clampdown last year, is a case of F1 "fixing" something that ain't broke. Same could be said for the tire rules; why have an arbitrary but simple set of rules when you can have an arbitrary and complicated set of rules instead!
Posted by: flatdarkmars at March 15, 2016 06:27 PM (vYV43)
4
I agree with Avatar re: the quals format and why they changed it, and I also agree with FDM about the tire rules.
Posted by: Wonderduck at March 15, 2016 07:31 PM (KiM/Y)
Now, you've got to get your car onto the track at the beginning of each
session, lest you be the first one knocked out and have to start behind the
back-markers.
Avatar, I don't see how the new rules change that. If a fast team (say, the
way Mercedes was this year) gets out early in Q1 and establishes a really fast
hot lap, why would they need to stay on the course? They won't be on the bubble;
they've already established themselves as being faster than anyone else.
If they misjudge and are within three or four of the bottom, they can always
send their car out again for another attempt at a faster hot lap. But if they
have already set a time that few others can reach, there's no incentive for them
to be on the track for the rest of that qual session. It's exactly the way it was this year.
That's an advantage for every team, not just the fast ones. With fewer cars on the circuit it's easier to set a better fast lap because there aren't many cars getting in the way. Not an advantage for the network, of course, but it's better for the teams. (Also reduces wear and tear on the cars.)
6
So it might be a simple case of "we pay these people to think up rules changes, they've gotta earn their keep somehow." Gotcha. *wry grin*
Posted by: GreyDuck at March 16, 2016 07:40 AM (rKFiU)
7
Actually, that's an interesting question. If you've got 2 or more cars with no time at the first elimination point, who gets the boot?
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at March 16, 2016 05:14 PM (/lg1c)
8
Well, the story is that Bernie Ecclestone decided "we have to do something to make qualifying more unpredictable!" His initial proposal was "time ballast" in which the top finishing drivers from the last race would have arbitrary amounts of time added to their qualifying lap times, causing them to most likely be placed further back on the grid. Everyone else rightly thought that this was a horrible idea; Harrison Bergeron was unavailable for comment. Then the "elimination qualifying" idea was put forward. Elimination qualifying is something, and "something must be done", therefore elimination qualifying must be done. Apparently.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at March 16, 2016 05:16 PM (vYV43)
9
Now, of course there is such a thing as Success Ballast. Both DTM and BTCC have rules that, if you win a race, you have extra weight added to your car for the next race... if you win THAT race, you have more weight added, and so on and so forth, up to (I think) 45kg. It's been a while since I looked into the rules, so they may have changed somewhat so don't ding me if I've got specifics wrong.
Success ballast works really well in touring cars and GT-style cars, but while I understand the desire to do it in F1, I'd probably be against it.
Posted by: Wonderduck at March 16, 2016 05:24 PM (KiM/Y)
10
Oh, I know about success ballast. Super GT does it too. I just hate it, is all.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at March 16, 2016 06:10 PM (vYV43)
11
I'm tired and had a funeral to attend today, so maybe I'm missing something perfectly obvious, but; regarding success ballast: why would you do that? What does it accomplish or prove?
12
Well Ben, it does make the racing closer, since the cars/drivers who might otherwise pull away will be slowed by it. The few BTCC races I watch usually feature some good wheel-to-wheel action. But it's horribly artificial and kind of undermines the idea that racing is a proper sport where the best competitor wins.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at March 16, 2016 06:42 PM (vYV43)
13
"Success ballast" sounds like the reverse of the mechanic in Mario Kart, where drivers at the back of the pack get a speed boost. That's fine in a video game, which is ostensibly about group fun. Doesn't seem so great for a race where lots of money is at stake.
Posted by: Rick C at March 16, 2016 06:45 PM (FvJAK)
14
So the point is to artificially make the racing closer, and therefore "more exciting". Which is the governing principle of NASCAR, as well. I do agree that close racing is better, but knowing it's a construct bugs me a bit.
Random Anime Picture #114: Forgotten, Or Outgrown? -Love Hina, Ep01
So what happened to Love Hina, anyway? It went from ridiculously popular to viewed with some vague distaste by a large segment of the community, on those rare occasions its mentioned at all. Heck, it was even one of the first series available via digital fansub.
It's goofy, it's fun, it's got plenty of fanservice, but at its core its a romance between two people that are perfect for each other, but can't quite admit it to themselves yet. While I think the manga is better than the anime, I enjoy them both.
So why the dislike for the series? Is it the violence perpetrated upon the main character? Do people think the animation hasn't aged well? Or is it just too goofy anymore? It's a classic series, though nobody will put it on any best-of-all-time lists. It's a heckuva romp, though.
1
I wasn't a huge fan of the anime, but my copies of the manga are fairly well worn, I've read them from start to finish at least three times over the years, and I can't begin to count how many times I've re-read just the last four books.
Posted by: David at March 14, 2016 03:24 AM (+TPAa)
2
For all the anime I was watching back then, somehow this show didn't really ping on my radar. Hmm. No idea.
Posted by: GreyDuck at March 14, 2016 07:24 AM (rKFiU)
3
For me it just went on too long. When you already know the ending, finding new ways to drag it out just got annoying.
5
I disagree with both your assertions, Steven. The first Negima series came out five full years after Love Hina, which hardly makes it a competitor.
Secondly, calling it "vastly better in every way" is pretty much nonsense. If it had been, I wouldn't have stopped watching, hm? There are enough similarities that Negima should have hooked me... and it didn't. The whole "10-year old main character being looked at as a love interest" thing is enough squick, thanks.
Posted by: Wonderduck at March 14, 2016 04:57 PM (KiM/Y)
What happened there was that Akamatsu was tired of doing harem stories, but the magazine insisted he do another. So he deliberately created something that looked like a harem but which totally subverted the genre. Of course it was squick -- he deliberately made it squick.
And then, over time, he converted it into what he really wanted to do: action adventure. And as ratings went up, the magazine let him -- and that's when Negima really hit its stride.
The first couple of years of Negima wasn't really very good -- and Akamatsu himself knew it. He was still running under the iron dictum from the magazine that he do another harem story.
But once he broke free from that, Negima became better than Love Hina in pretty much every way. For one thing it actually had a story to tell, which Love Hina didn't really AFAIK. As you yourself said, it was always obvious which girl was going to be the one in Love Hina.
But in Negima we had the story of what was going on with Negi's dad, and there was the entire Magical World arc. Plus a lot of the characters, particularly several of the girls in Negi's class, were fleshed out nicely as characters and not just as massively eccentric haremettes.
7
I experienced this very reaction the last time I tried to read through the series again. I got about halfway through and just realized I no longer had the patience to deal with another 7 volumes of "never mind if there's a plausible explanation, Keitaro's a pervert so let's hit him." The fact that he does tend to bring at least a measure of that on himself doesn't help so much as it makes me want to hit him too, for being such a dope he can't remember to knock on a bedroom door after the nth time. Even animals learn not to stick their noses where it hurts.
Love Hina just runs way too long and leans way too hard on the Idiot Plot button. I still have some lingering fondness for Akamatsu lurking in a cockle or two, so maybe someday soon I'll give Negima a further look...once I can figure out the whole Negima/Negima!/Negima?!/Negima!?#@^$% titling thing.
Posted by: Tagmec at March 15, 2016 09:43 PM (e5ntq)
Don't bother with either full length anime. "Negima!" is based on the earliest part of the manga, when it was still a harem show and was lousy. "Negima!?" is a loose adaptation which borrows the characters but doesn't even remotely try to stick to the canon.
There were some OVAs which did stay true to the manga but they come out of later parts of the story, so jumping into them early will just confuse you.
Those OVA's are the best part. Unfortunately they're not good as stand-alone stories, and they don't tell a continuous story, but jump around instead. The exception is Yue's, where she's amnesiac and enrolled into the Magic World's magic school. It's self-contained, and really good. The one immediately before it requires some knowledge of the manga/story, but is also very good, at least in the latter half.
Sigh.... I'm still pissed over that abortion of a series ending, and refuse to read UO because of it.
Spook, Frighten and Amuse Wonderduck Day.
The drawback of taking a "mental health" day when you have mandatory overtime to complete is that you have fewer days to accomplish the task with. As a result, I've done five hours of overtime in the past two nights... and both nights I was the last person in the building. To be honest, this isn't a bad thing. After all, when I was running the Duck U Bookstore, I was always there long after the store closed, and that meant I could pretty much behave how I wished. If I wanted to sing along with my music, I could. If it was warm in the store, I could change into a pair of shorts. Y'know, that sort of thing. So I'm alone in my office, and it appears that I was totally alone in the entire building... what's a Wonderduck to do?
That's right, crank up the tunes and sing along!
And if you're totally sure you're alone, you occasionally throw caution to the wind and do hand motions, chairdance, and once or twice do a stand-up-spin-in-place-sit-back-down thing in time with the music. And for the record, I very much want that scrolling light frontispiece that SNL has on the stage for this performance of Uptown Funk, that's sweet.
...until the cleaning staff shows up, and you don't hear them come in because you've got your headphones cranked, and they walk in on you singing and carrying on. I very nearly jumped out of my shoes, and near to wet myself to boot. Oh dear.
On the way home, I stopped at a local gas station for... motor oil and some two liter bottles of ginger ale. I bet you thought I was going to get gas, didn't you? Hah! Fooled ya! Anyway, y'all know the Duckmobile is old... indeed, it's 20 years old, I've had it for 18, and it's really showing its age in many ways. When I exited the gas station, I smelled a horrible odor, one I've unfortunately smelled before. It was the stench of drastically overheated radiator fluid, burning oil, and melted rubber. It was the smell of automotive death, is what it was. I froze, desperately staring at the Duckmobile, looking for the telltale plume of steam and smoke that always accompanies such smells... and not seeing it. And I should have, the car was wonderfully back-lighted by the bright lights of the pumping area. It wasn't until I got to the driver's side that I discovered that a SUV parked a few cars down from me had its hood up... and there was the huge gout of vapor, too. Poor guy was just standing there, trying to figure out what to do, while his passenger went inside... hopefully to buy a jug of Prestone or something.
Then I finally made it home, got comfy... and found THIS waiting for me:
It amused the heck outta me, I'll tell you what. And now it's the weekend, yay!
Long Time, Long Time
Y'know, I was trying to write about various complaints and gripes and pains and how I have 10 toes but only nine toenails and it took me two hours to take a test at work that should have taken a half-hour and even my walletmoths have walletmoths and I'm sick of cup noodles and I got an unpleasant letter from a friend and I don't want to deal with it and I'm up for potential jury duty and I just want it all to stop so I'm taking a mental health day at work tomorrow and sleeping late and taking a nap or two and I couldn't make any of it interesting so here's a picture instead and I think I can finally now end this incredibly long run-on sentence.
1
I had to look up "walletmoth", and then I felt silly for not figuring it out on my own.
Sounds like the rest day is very much needed. Here's hoping it does the trick!
Posted by: GreyDuck at March 09, 2016 10:06 AM (rKFiU)
2
Is it just the sinus thing I have going on (and/or trying to balance out Advil and Benadryl with strong coffee), or when you first look at that picture, does it look like a bunch of penguins in the foreground?
Posted by: Ad absurdum per aspera at March 09, 2016 05:44 PM (erzMQ)
3
I think it's the benadryl, Uncle Ad, but I'll be damned if I don't prefer your description over reality.
Posted by: Wonderduck at March 09, 2016 11:20 PM (KiM/Y)
The whole "Ships as girls" mecha-musume concept just didn't work for me for this show. It was handled slightly better for Arpeggio of Blue Steel, however, IMHO.
They never gave us any hints about what the Fog were, where they came from, or why they were doing what they were doing, so that wasn't any good. But the ships with Mental Models worked for me, especially since they were quite varied, and kept changing the more contact they had with humans.
And I liked their version of Kirishima (a teddy bear) better. This Kirishima is just another big-busted lady pretty much indistinguishable from all the others.
3
The whole point of KanColle is the character design. While I was hoping the anime would add more story than it did, it certainly translated the ship girls faithfully and beautifully. Everybody can find their own favorite. I'm partial to Nagato, Kongo and Haruna, myself.
4
Just like Fate/Stay, the real fun is seeing what fans do with the characters. There's a ton of 'em, they've got just enough personality to hook something onto, and the plot is thin enough that you don't have to worry about "well, when in the war is this happening?"
I've seen anything from detailed technical explanations of what the ships used to be and how they fought, to Northern Princess used as a kind of mittened Yotsuba, to character studies dealing with alcoholism, to cries de couer from game-players who've had things go wrong one (hundred) too many times. Abyssals show up to attack the base, to infiltrate and impersonate people, or just to hit the ice cream shop. The German ships show up and hilarity ensues. The marriage system is, of course, a popular topic. So is Akagi's appetite...
And of course there's a billion tons of porn, par for the course.
I've even seen a few that tried to explain, why Kancolle? Putting together an explanation that explains abyssals, ship girls, fairies, the compass, and all that ain't easy.
Posted by: Avatar at March 06, 2016 03:23 PM (v29Tn)
5
The only plausible explanation for something like this is The Rule of Cool, and the Rule of Sexy.
I've never seen the series before, I finished the first three episodes last night. I saw a list recently of the "10 best older anime" or some such (2004 is old? groan!), and it was right near the top. I figured, hey, why not? And here I am.
Posted by: Wonderduck at March 04, 2016 08:45 PM (KiM/Y)
3
In that case, I look forward to your views, and I will refrain from spoilers!
4
I don't watch nearly as much anime as you, but I think Planetes is my personal favorite of all the series I've watched. Of course, I'm predisposed to like it because I love hard sci-fi, so your mileage may vary.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at March 05, 2016 08:49 AM (Ykyrg)
6
I watched Planetes when it was airing (I may even have been participating in and/or running the forum back then) and I liked it well enough but wandered away before the ending. Like many shows, it's on my "if I'm ever bored enough to go through the backlog of all the things I should re-watch some day" list.
Posted by: GreyDuck at March 06, 2016 10:15 AM (rKFiU)
7
It's a fascinating series. Starting around ep 9, they make small changes to the OP, reflecting what the viewer now knows; the ED has a gradual change as well, but that mainly serves to highlight a subtle series-long joke.
F1 Pr0n: Sauber C35
The fourth oldest team (using current names) on the grid, behind only Ferrari, McLaren and Williams, Sauber F1 finally got their 2016 challenger on track. So what magic does the team from Hinwil, Switzerland, bring us this year?
Did you know it rains about half the time in Hinwil, and that the little town has a population of around 10000? Neither did I. What does that have to do with the C35? Nothing at all. About the car, people who know these things say that the front from the cockpit to the nose is, essentially, the same as last year's design as used from Singapore on. For the most part that's fine, but most of the other teams have changed their front suspension to have a unified lower wishbone. Sauber has not, which should incur some sort of drag penalty.. how much and if it's enough to matter is another question. The front wing is, more or less, new and essentially a copy of the Mercedes wing style.
Moving backwards, there's a startling change to the size of the C35's sidepods in comparison to last year. They're smaller, more sculpted, and with a greater undercut to them... very much like the Ferrari, in fact. Which makes sense, since Sauber uses Ferrari power units. It stands to reason that their cooling requirements would be similar. "Similar" doesn't mean "the same" however, and the C35 has larger inlets than Ferrari. Maybe things are packaged differently underneath the bodywork. One completely unique feature of the car is the rear wing support. Everybody else has a single pylon setup last year but Sauber, who kept a more traditional twin pylon design. This year, they've changed to a Y-shaped pylon, probably for weight and aero reasons. We'll know if it works when other teams start changing to Y-pylons.
With luck, the C35 will bring Sauber back to the days where they were right on the verge of joining the Big Four. They're too good to languish in the ranks of the backmarkers.