Shameless Plug Time!
For many years, I've been on the case of the Official First Friend of The Pond, Vaucaunson's Duck, about his lack of blog, website, or other internet presence. Y'see, if there's anybody out there for whom blogging was created, it would be Vauc.
For the same amount of years, he has protested my case-being-onning, saying that he fully intended to have a website, but there wasn't going to be any of that "under construction" stuff going on. He also wanted to find the right hosting service. Knowing that Big Papa Pixy hizownbadself is a kind and generous tyrantdespotdictatorAustralian ruler of all MuMeeNuVia, I offered to find out for Vauc what he'd be willing to do, but my old friend declined the offer. *shrug*
So on and on it went, me ribbing Vauc, Vauc saying "it'll happen, it'll happen." Well, I'm happy to announce that it has, in fact, happened. Now to be honest, Vauc's site is a little... well, niche. I mean, you've got websites that are rather specialized out there (case in point: Combined Fleet). You've got websites that are devoted to single topics (for example, the lamented Fire Joe Morgan). And then you've got what Vauc's website is about: chickens.
Well, poultry. Well, poultry as covered by a small New York publishing firm in the early-to-mid 1900s. Well, poultry, a small New York publishing firm in the early-to-mid 1900s, and the town it was located in. As strange as all that may sound, The Van Hoesen Press is honestly quite intriguing. If you're like me, and god help you if you are, you find learning about stuff you know nothing about to be fascinating and endlessly entertaining. Here's your chance to be entertained! I invite my readers to give the place a look-see. It's actually something of a family history project for Vauc, as Roy Van Hoesen was his Great-Grandfather.
As the website just went live a few days ago, if nothing else we can give it a mini-stress-test... a Duckalanche, if you will. And, heck, where else would you discover that there was once a periodical entitled "The Bacon Hog Quarterly"?
Valentine's Day 2012
There's no doubt in my mind that The Pond is the only place on the intarwebz where you're going to find this:
The combination of rubber duckies and Katawa Shoujo for Valentine's Day, exclusive to this little website. And you get to see it... aren't you lucky?
Rin's opinion notwithstanding, of course.
Yay For Kidney Stones!
I've passed thirteen kidney stones in my life. They hurt like nothing I've ever experienced before or since. I am probably the last person to celebrate a diagnosis of kidney stones.
What If...? #5: Opening The LocksAdmiral Osami Nagano walked into the meeting room with an ashen look on his face. Taking his seat at the head of the table, he looked less like the Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy's General Staff, and more like the weak leader some thought he was. With a shaken tone to his voice, he brought the meeting to order. "Gentlemen, I've been informed that the aircraft carrying Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto on his inspection tour of the Solomon Islands... has been shot down. He is confirmed dead." As the rest of the General Staff reacted to this grim news, he continued. "Admiral Ugaki survived, but is seriously injured." He looked around the table. "Coming so soon on the heels of our losses.. no, let's call them what they are, our defeats, at Midway and that damnable 'Starvation Island', this is another terrible blow. Reports are that the first of the new American aircraft carriers is nearing completion, soon to be followed by a half-dozen more. Gentlemen, unless something is done quickly, the unstoppable tide will soon sweep over us and wash us away. Do any of you have any plans that can balance the ledger sheet in our favor?"
Silence fell over the table. Nagano looked at the assembled General Staff with something approaching horror on his face. "Nothing? Was Yamamoto the only one of us with an imagination?" At that goading, many of the militaristic hardliners flushed angrily but remained quiet. From the far end of the table, a quiet yet confident voice, loud in the nearly silent room, said "There is a plan we have been working on...."
When one thinks of the Imperial Japanese Navy in World War II, one undoubtedly thinks of the aircraft carriers of the Kido Butai, or the massive battleships Yamato and Musashi. More thoughtfully, one might consider the deadly efficient force of cruisers they put to sea or their squadrons of destroyers, considered by many to be the best of the War. Yet only rarely would any consider sparing a thought to the IJN's submarines, unless it was to react in horror to the kaiten manned torpedoes fielded as a counterpoint to the kamikaze. This is a mistake, as the Japanese submarine force was interestingly varied, not to mention fairly successful in their generally assigned role of warship hunters. Japanese submarines sank as many American fleet carriers (two, Yorktown and Wasp) as their conventional naval air did (Lexington and Hornet).
On the whole, Japanese submarines were inventive and cleverly designed, if perhaps ill-used. Without a doubt, however, there was one surprising class of submarine where they were the unquestioned best in the world.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at February 12, 2012 01:52 AM (I55Es)
2
If they'd pushed the issue they could have done that attack much sooner, several pre-war classes of their subs carried 1-2 planes. Other, less optimal planes were available, but even the Seiran's first flight was in '43.
As to the admittedly brief respite the blowing of Gatun Dam would have gained them (a year at the very most) a few extra months breathing time before the B-29 raids essentially stopped domestic production could have complicated things for the allies. Historically, a whole slew of advanced fighters as well as several ships including the 16 Unryu class aircraft carriers and a gazillion fast coastal defence subs were halted or delayed when bombers got within range of the home islands, often within a few months ( or weeks) of completion or in the case of the high performance aircraft, just as production was spinning up.
A few extra months of training for the new generation of carrier pilots might have made a great deal of difference at the battle of the Philippine Sea (or whatever took its place).
A few extra months of unmolested Japanese production and aircrew training would not have changed the ultimate outcome of the war, but it could have increased the cost of ataining that outcome out of all proportion to the investment of a few subs and aircrew.
Straying rather further afield, while he canal attack would only work once, assuming that the I-400 program retains its
priority, the I-400s would be coming online in late '43 and early '44.
An attack on New York and possibly Washington using disease bombs could
have caused considerable mayhem. They'd have a better than even chance
of succeeding as the alied ASW effort depended on radio direction
finding and broken codes to track German wolfpacks, none of which would
help against these boats as they'd be not be using German codebooks and
wouldn't need to transmit since the knew where their target was.
Posted by: brickmuppet at February 12, 2012 02:24 PM (EJaOX)
Actually, the planners of the construction of the Panama Canal had envisioned a situation where the Gatun Locks or any of the other locks would breached (In the unlikely event of a ship managing to be so out of control that they managed to smashed through all the other safeguards.). They built an ultimate failsafe for it - portable dams for just that eventuality, to prevent the loss of too much water. So draining Gatun Lake was never going to happen if they simply attacked the locks. Hitting the dam would have been more worthwhile, but the dam might have been easier to fix. Knocking the locks out of action would still be worth it.
Of course, by 1942, the US Navy was already planning to send to sea ships larger than the canal could handle, so ultimately, it would not have meant as much either.
As for using the I-400 - you wonder if the Japanese would have been through enough not use their radio communications at any part...
Posted by: cxt217 at February 12, 2012 04:05 PM (k9NA7)
4
@Muppet: I left the date undefined because I couldn't quite figure out the minimum construction time required for an I-400 class sub. In my brain, the attack in the post took place in early-to-mid '44.
@cxt: I didn't know about the portable dams, and haven't seen any reference to them in my research... interesting stuff, that. I will note that while the Navy had plans to put Panamax-plus ships to sea, ultimately they didn't in WWII.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 12, 2012 05:43 PM (K/dx0)
5
The MONTANA class got cancelled but I believed MIDWAY herself went to sea before the end of war. If the war had lasted any longer, MIDWAY would have been sent on the long way around to join the Pacific Fleet.
Posted by: cxt217 at February 12, 2012 06:30 PM (k9NA7)
There was a nontrivial amount of shipbuilding, including warships, on the US West Coast, which wouldn't have been affected by damage to the Canal.
Quite a lot of it was intended for the European theater, but if the Canal had been taken out, they could have shuffled things around.
Also, by mid 1944 the US Navy in the Pacific was already large enough to win the war. Additional forces made that easier, but Nimitz could have won it anyway.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 12, 2012 07:23 PM (+rSRq)
The West Coast did have a lot of shipbuilding - Henry Kaiser and Marinship comes to mind - but warship construction was pretty much dominated by the East Coast yards. The largest warships built on the West Coast during WW2 were the four OAKLAND class CLs. Every other cruiser, battleship, light and fleet carriers, were all built on the East Coast. So were most of the destroyers.
Nimitz and PACFLT probably had enough warships to defeat the Japanese, but the operational strain would have been immense.
I do wonder how much of MIDWAY's completion was slowed down by the imminent end of the war. The US Navy was already cancelling ships from March 1945 on.
Posted by: cxt217 at February 12, 2012 08:30 PM (k9NA7)
There's one big shadow over the end of the war which renders most of these kinds of what-if's moot. For instance, when people talk about, "What if the Normandy Invasion had failed" or "What if the Battle of the Bulge had turned out to be a German victory", the answer to all those questions is the same: the first A-bomb would have been dropped on Berlin, and the war in Europe would have ended in early August 1945.
By the same token, these what-if's about the Pacific all have the same answer: The war ends in early August 1945 no matter what happens before that.
If, for instance, the Japanese somehow managed to preven the Americans from taking Guam and Saipan, then the B-29's carrying the bomb would have flown from western China. But they still would have flown, and the bombs still would have been dropped, and the war would still have ended.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 12, 2012 08:51 PM (+rSRq)
10
Way back in my original "What If...?" post, in the beginning of 2008, you proposed (in a reaction post of your own) that the bombs would have been flown from China, Steven. I'll repeat what I said back then here: Not a chance. The chance that the plane carrying the bomb would have a
malfunction and crash-land someplace the Japanese could get their hands
on it wouldn't be taken under ANY circumstances. We barely let our friends know what was going on with the bomb, after all. The flight from
Tinian, on the other hand, was completely over water... perfect for
jettisoning the bomb where nobody untoward could get their hands on it.
The
logistical problems with flying B-29s from China are well-documented as
well. Throw in the added headaches of trying to get the various pieces
of the bomb to the Chinese base, and it seems even less likely.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 12, 2012 09:57 PM (K/dx0)
I think you underestimate the issues Truman was facing by that point. The American people were tired of war. They wanted it over with. The only alternative was the November invasion, which was estimated to be profoundly bloody and difficult.
I think Truman would have ordered them to do it anyway, irrespective of the objections you raise.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 12, 2012 10:14 PM (+rSRq)
12
You forget the third alternative, blockade. Much less costly than invasion, at least for the US, and they'd be able to discharge a rather large amount of men to boot. The Navy backed the plan, and it's pretty clear it would have worked very well by that time. Japan would have starved to death, but that would have been a minor consideration by then.
I don't doubt that the bombs would have been dropped; just not from China.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 12, 2012 11:37 PM (K/dx0)
13
When I suggest the war might have continued longer or been more costly, it only would have been so until bases in B-29 range could be secured. If the IJN and IJA had upgraded their air forces in the interim then there would have been a reduction operation until their air forces had been culled sufficiently to allow the atomic bombs to be delivered.
Unlikely that the war lasts past early to mid '46. Even if something like Hatanaka's gambit had succeeded, we would see operation Downfall, which in its post trinity version involved the use of 14 nukes. I can't see it going on past mid '46.
Note too that if the war goes much past August '45 AT ALL, then MILLIONS of Japanese start starving. One of the things the Allies discovered when they landed was that Japan was essentially out of food, the US and Commonwealth navies spent the winter shipping food in.
I agree with Wonderduck that nukes from China is a non starter. The nationalists were actually backed and trained by the U.S.S.R. and the other force in China was the Maoists. We were NOT going to send our super secret weapon there to be handed over to Stalin (we had our own academics to take care of that).
Posted by: brickmuppet at February 13, 2012 12:34 AM (EJaOX)
American war-wariness was a major concern for Truman and officials within his administration - which is incidentally one of, though not the only, reasons for unconditional surrender - but nothing I have read about and from Harry Truman supports the proposition that he would launch the nuclear-equipped B-29s from China or any place where the bomb would not have absolute security because of domestic considerations. FDR might have considered it (Though even he was not likely to approve it.), but not Truman. There was a better chance of the USAAF perfecting in-flight refueling to allow a longer-range B-29 flight than a China base scenario.
That the Japanese was running out of food would have shorten the war, but since the Japanese military and government had made it clear they would let millions of Japanese civilians starve to insure the military remained fed, I doubt it would have shortened the war too much. Lack of materials to fight the war would have done much more to shorten to war, but not that much sooner, even with a full scale blockade being launched.
One thing which becomes clear is that Japan was really fortunate they surrendered when they did. Even a delay of a few more months would have seen XXI Bomber Command focus B-29 attacks on the Japanese rail system while maintaining their mining operations. If the former had happened, it would have crippled the Japanese rail system, which meant millions of Japanese would have starved even AFTER surrender because the distribution system had been wrecked.
This is the irony when people base their arguments against the use of the atomic bomb on the USSBS, which assumed the USAAF kept pounding Japan with B-29 raids. Dying of starvation is no less pleasant than dying from nuclear attack.
Posted by: cxt217 at February 13, 2012 05:27 PM (k9NA7)
F1 Pr0n: Williams FW34
Sir Frank's team is one of a regal history having fallen on hard times of late. The team has been around for 35 years, and is one of F1's historical "Big Four" teams (with Ferrari, McLaren and Renault). In the time I've been an active fan of the sport, however, they team has, at best, just been okay... and at worst, they've been bad. So will a return to Renault engines, paired with the new FW34 chassis bring a return to prominence?
No less an individual than Sir Frank Williams hisownbadself has said that the new car has less than 5% parts in common with last year's FW33. In some ways, this is good: that car was a dog. It's also quite the risk, as F1 teams have historically found that evolution, not revolution, is the way to success. Again, though, the 2011 car was just bad and there probably wasn't all that much worth keeping. Having said all that... the Williams' paint job is terrible for seeing details. The platypus step looks like it's a vertical wall. It's not, but that's the way it looks. Big air intakes, maybe the largest we've seen so far. I'm amused by the Gillette sponsorship on the multi-level front wings... ladies and gentlemen, the twin-bladed razor of F1 cars!
Wacky rear wing! The sidepods are small-ish, but nicely shaped. No undercut on them at all though. I HATE the the "flying" fin on the airbox. I'm sure it's aerodynamic, but I just don't like it. I'm kinda struggling for stuff to talk about with this car. Of course, I've talked about what, six or seven others already?
I've lowered the contrast by 50%, I've boosted the brightness by 30%, and increased the saturation, and the car still looks like it's sucking in all light within 20 feet. Ugly nose. Having said all that, I really hope there's some speed in this chassis. Formula 1 would be much better off with Williams being good.
I'll admit it: I got nuthin' here. The team sounds like they're excited about the FW34, but they would do, wouldn't they? On the other hand, I can't get excited about it. If everything goes right, does anybody realistically see them finishing any better than 5th in the constructors?
1
Rainy races are going to be a problem. OTOH, your description reminds me of Disaster Area's stunt ship. Being almost completely friction-less would certainly help performance.
Posted by: Ben at February 14, 2012 10:28 PM (RalIr)
2
You would think so, but would it not actually hinder performance? After all, with no friction you have no grip, and therefore no handling or acceleration.
My god... HRT has a frictionless car!
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 14, 2012 11:35 PM (Zg0Yp)
Grumblerumblerazzin'frazzin'...
Oh yeah, I'm lovin' life right now, and I'm NOT in a good mood.
That about covers it...
As the Regional Manager said the other day, "when things go south, it's Wonderduck who suffers." For at least the rest of the week, I'll be running the Duck U Bookstore. For at least the rest of the week, I'm also the entire staff of the Duck U Bookstore. That's right, I'm open to close, alone, all day every day. On one hand, yay overtime. On the other hand, boo working myself into the ground. On the gripping hand, kill me.
"But Wonderduck," I hear you say, which is impressive because I'm blasting a track by Galynerus at about 25% volume, which is loud enough to shake ducks off my two computer hutches, and couldn't actually hear anybody unless they were yelling in my ear... in fact, here, join me, won't you?
"But Wonderduck," I hear you say, "at least the textbook rush is over, right?" Yep, it's over all right... which means it's time to send books back to their publishers. Hundreds of books. Thousands of pounds of books. Alone. Oh my achin' back. Oh, and let's not forget the complaining customers... "no, you can't return the lab manual you've torn 12 pages out of... please stop swearing at me, miss."
I haven't watched any anime in over a week, and that was just a single episode of Bodacious Space Pirates. So here's what I'm going to do: I'm going to go watch some anime and the Williams F1 Pr0n can bugger off until I feel like doing it (tomorrow or whenever). Meanwhile, you folks have a whole comments section to play around in until I get back. Have fun, don't make a mess.
Posted by: brickmuppet at February 08, 2012 08:14 PM (EJaOX)
2
Any time I'm prone to thinking my life is a pain, I can always count on you to cheer me up.... I just wish you could do it in a less painful manner to yourself.
Posted by: ubu at February 08, 2012 08:22 PM (GfCSm)
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 09, 2012 09:01 PM (EVb8m)
8
I actually recall hearing that song quite a bit somewhere, which is unusual for me, since I don't usually listen to music. Was it used in any anime, perhaps?
Posted by: Siergen at February 09, 2012 11:50 PM (3/gGt)
9
What's that first picture from? It's kinda haunting.
Posted by: Mauser at February 10, 2012 02:42 AM (cZPoz)
10
@Siergen, Alsatia was the OP for Mnemnosyne a couple of years ago.
@Mauser, it's from Ep01 of Angel Beats!. That's the eponymous "Angel."
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 10, 2012 07:09 AM (EVb8m)
11
It is not F-1 but it sure looks like fun.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-Dkys6csRws
Posted by: jon spencer at February 10, 2012 02:30 PM (hFoyt)
12
I watched the whole thing expecting him to end up in the wall, upside down and on fire... and it didn't happen. Wow.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 10, 2012 09:02 PM (K/dx0)
F1 Pr0n: Red Bull RB8
While the boys from Milton Keynes debuted their 2012 challenger yesterday, it wasn't much of a much. Instead of actually showing the car in any way, they released a couple of renders and a crappy video. However, with today being the start of Winter Testing in Jerez, Spain, we got to REALLY see the RB8 for the first time today. Or, at least, we did once it finally took to the track some four hours late. Seems the delivery of some important part of the car was delayed by fog at the airport. Whoopsie.
Well, that's different. Red Bull's solution to the platypus nose is to hollow it out... which makes sense, once you think about it. That vent is certainly being used to cool the driver, the electronics, or both. It probably does away with a lot of the drag caused by the stairstep, too... or at least removes much of the disturbed airflow from where it'd do the most damage, aerodynamically. The sidepod inlets are smaller in comparison to last year's runaway winner, though not dramatically so.
In fact, there aren't all that many changes from the RB7 (above, bottom). I mean, beyond the obvious platypus nose. The airbox cover doesn't have the thin fin any longer and the verticals on the rear wing are now square with dangling "fingers", as opposed to the curved cut of last year's car. The sidepods don't look as high, but they also don't seem to slope down as far. So, not many obvious changes, but that shouldn't be a surprise... I mean, it's not like the RB7 wasn't the best car around in 2011 or anything. As I mentioned last year, any changes are probably under the skin.
After looking at the slot in the nose, I think we've finally figured out where Mark Webber and Seb Vettel have to slide their timecards. That nose might just be the worst of the bunch... what is it that it reminds me of? Oh... oh yeah, I've got it.
F1 MegaPr0n: Lotus, Sauber and Toro Rosso
It's been a busy couple of days in the F1 rollout season! Four teams brought out their 2012 challengers... and only one of them, Sauber, released glamour shots of their car. So for a F1 MegaPr0n, we only have a few workable pictures, and there's only one angle that all three of the teams in this MegaPr0n used. Fortunately, it's the three-quarters angle, which is the most useful for our purposes. Ladies and gentlemen, the first ever F1 mini-MegaPr0n! First up, Renault Lotus!
Proof that it's possible to make a good looking platypus nosed F1 car. Of course, this isn't surprising, because the Renault Lotus E20 appears to be last year's Renault Renault! It appears that the team had to do quite a bit of engineering work to re-route the forward facing exhaust system to meet the tech regs, and as a result development on the rest of the car stagnated. The platypus nose is nothing particularly difficult to accomplish, obviously. However, Renault Lotus actually managed to make this one look good... or at least, not as awful as all the others. It's not the hideous ramp that Ferrari has, nor is it the "hills and valley" used by the other teams. Other than those changes, though, it really is the Renault Renault R31, all over again. That may not be a horrible thing.
Like Renault Lotus, Sauber's C31 seems to be a C30 in 2012 regulations, there are a few changes. Obviously the platypus nose is present... but the hump has a trick involved. There's a thin gap where the nosecone meets the hump, apparently an attempt to disrupt a little bit of the drag that'll undoubtedly be created by the thing. Will it work? Who knows? Other changes are a touch more subtle. The sidepods, which were already cut down last year, have been even smaller and more rounded. The top of the car from the cockpit to the front tires is flat; last year it actually was angled up from the cockpit to the tires. The whole chassis is very clean, almost austere in looks. I rather like it. The biggest change, though, is the addition of Oerlikon as a sponsor. Does this mean there's a 20mm autocannon hidden in the airbox?
Toro Rosso's STR7 has a "hills-and-valley" approach to the platypus, which is as good as any, I suppose. I suppose it's boring to say that it's very similar to last year's STR6, so I won't... though it is. The sidepods are shorter and more deeply cut than those on last year's car, which should remove quite a bit of parasitic drag from the chassis. The airbox has an interesting support arrangement to it now, and under the main intake, there's a second intake, presumably for cooling the KERS unit. Something that isn't particularly visible in the pictures of the cars rolled out to date is the position of the exhausts. Toro Rosso's is set about as far back as they can legally go, and their position seems to be blowing right onto the rear wing. "We can't use a blown diffuser, but nobody said anything about a blown rear wing," seems to be the plan.
In an interview with Toro Rosso's designer, Georgio Ascanelli, I finally heard an explanation for the new nose height. It seems that the maximum height of 550mm is the same as the height of the anti-penetration panels on the sides of the cockpit. It was done to prevent an impalement, which of course we've seen dozens of times in the past couple of years alone (/sarcasm off). A solution looking for a problem...
Now, sharp-eyed readers might have noticed that I said that there had been FOUR rollouts over the past two days, yet I've only shown three. That's because the fourth team was Red Bull, and all they let us see were a couple of cheap renders of the car they'll be defending their title with. With the first offseason practice session beginning on Tuesday, I expect we'll be seeing a little more than that tomorrow, so I'll hit it and Williams then!
Katawa Shoujo: The Review
Over five years ago, a particular bit of colorized doujin art from the year 2000 made its way to the 4chan image boards, where it made quite the splash. So much of one that some denizens of that board decided to follow the original artist's intentions and turn the artwork into a ren'ai game. Two years later, the group (now calling itself 4Leaf Studios, or "4LS") brought out a demo. The demo, entitled "Act I", was a hit and brought quite a bit of attention to the game. And then... three more years would pass before 4LS announced that the full game would be released before the end of 2011. Shortly before that deadline, they moved the date to January 4th, 2012; five years to the day that a particular bit of colorized doujin art hit 4chan.
Nobody on the staff of 4LS had ever made a game before. The amount of work involved in such an endeavor is daunting, but they certainly pulled it off; they did release a game. The question, though, is just how good is it? To be truthful, it's hard to imagine it being any good at all considering the topic material. Disabled high school students? A dating sim about disabled high school students? Controversial, to say the least. When Act I came out, a common reaction was "...that game makes me ill, what's wrong with those people?" So now that the full version has been released, what's the real verdict?
I did torrent this when you recommended it, but I haven't had time to even install it. I have no idea when I might have time to play with it.
Posted by: Mauser at February 07, 2012 06:04 AM (cZPoz)
2
Had a 60km run... See You Space Cowboy, Rainbow Wizard, and What Were You Waiting For? in one run, that started off with a bunch of bad bounces. Misha, Misha, and more Misha... I think Hisao did the last 35km continuously on fire, too.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at February 09, 2012 05:22 AM (GJQTS)
Name This Mystery Ship XII
Might be a fun one this time... or it might be ridiculously easy. It'll be one of the two, for sure.
Usual rules apply: no Imagesearch or anything like that. I can't do anything about it, but your victory will be tainted and hagridden. If you DO win, you get a post on a topic of your choice! While I don't do politics, religion or pr0n (other than F1 Pr0n), anything else is fair game.
Time for a naval "what if?" I've read that the Nazi long range plan was to start WW II in 1943, by which time they would have a "balanced fleet", including at least one aircraft carrier. They had already built and were testing aircraft for it, including a carrier-based version of the Ju87 Stuka.
My questions is, assuming that their plans worked out, and the second World War started in 1943 at a time and stiuation of their choosing, what would they use their aircract carrier for? I don't think anyone would consider using a carrier to support an invasion across the narrow English channel, and they expected a quick war where interdicting convoys would not be a factor, so what did they plan on doing with it?
Posted by: Siergen at February 05, 2012 12:40 PM (3/gGt)
Remember the Bismarck? Think that would have gone the same if Bismarck had been accompanied by a carrier?
Germany's naval problem was that all their major ports were bottled up. They could build big ships, but they couldn't get them out into the open sea to fight with them.
A blue water fleet with carrier air support could have done something about Gibralter, for example. (Or at least tried.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2012 02:25 PM (+rSRq)
There were three strategic constrictions between the German ship-building ports on the Baltic and the open ocean. Denmark was the first, but that could be solved by land invasion.
The second was the section of sea between Scotland and Norway. The third was the line between Scotland and Greenland.
Bismarck actually made it past all three of them, but only by shedding all its escorts and proceeding alone.
...and it would have made it, had it not been spotted by a PBY, and then attacked at long range by English carrier-based biplanes. A German carrier would have made all the difference.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2012 02:29 PM (+rSRq)
No guarantees the fighters from a German carrier would have shot down the PBY before it made its report (Even the Kido Butai did not have that much success doing so.) and considering the weather conditions in the fatal torpedo attack, it would have been doubtful any fighters would have made it into the air. Of course, Goering did all he could to insure German naval aviation was stillborn - flying an ME 109 in the North Atlantic sounds positively insane.
Germany could have completed the Graf Zeppelin and maybe the Z Plan as well, but what would they have given up to free the materials for it? Germany faced major resource and industrial shortages even before the war, far more than most people realize, and the Kriegsmarine usually ended up at the back of the bus since its was less important than the Army or influential as the Luftwaffe. Even the projected date of 1945 would not have been possible, given the competing demands - it is implied that the first of the H-class battleships would have not been completed until 1946, even if their construction had not been postponed/cancelled by the war.
Of course, that also ignores what the other nations would be doing. Nothing would be unsettling to a German crew than to break out into the Atlantic during 1944, only to find Lion and Temeraire and maybe a sister or four waiting for them.
Posted by: cxt217 at February 05, 2012 03:00 PM (DkLfO)
F1 Pr0n: Ferrari F2012
You know something's kinda wrong when no less a light than Stefano Domenicali, team principal for Scuderia Ferrari, comes out and publicly says "Well, actually, it’s not really so pretty from my personal perspective. But this is a value that doesn’t count in Formula 1... ...as our chairman has already said the fact that it is ugly or very nice
doesn’t count a lot. The most important thing is that the car has to be
performing." In other words, "winning fixes ugly." Having said that, Ferrari better win a lot of races this season, because the new F2012 is a lot of ugly.
Though to be honest, from the front it looks not so bad at all. The front wing is supposedly evolved from the flexi-bendy wing they ran at the end of the 2011 season. For their sake, I hope they got the "oscillating like a USGS seismometer in a magnitude 9.5 earthquake" feature fixed. There were times when I wondered how the Red cars were able to stay on the track, even going in a straight line, because of that wing flapping like an ornithopter.
From the side, it still doesn't look so bad. Like the McLaren, there appears to be an angle (back-to-front) to the floor. The sidepods are deeply undercut, more like the Force India than the McLaren, though not the same sort of profile. Amazing how so many teams can do the same thing, but come up with completely different designs. It'll be interesting to see which one comes off the best. One thing that comes back from past designs is the weird double rear bodywork thingy on the engine cover. I've never been fond of that design element, and it doesn't look any better here. It looks like the engine cover came off the sprue badly and nobody bothered to trim the flash off.
...and now the hideousness of the nose becomes apparent. Yeesh... if anything, it may be worse than the Lotus Caterham and the Force India solutions. However, this does raise an interesting question: just how did McLaren's nose fit under the technical regulations while a team like Ferrari does... this? Interesting that there's another fin between the front wheels; haven't seen that before, have we? According to the team, the car is almost all brand new, with very little coming over from the F150° Italia. I gather the rear wing is pretty much the same, with just some very minor tweaking.
The Scuderia was to have a huge blowout at the Ferrari factory at Maranello, followed by a few laps at the team's test track, literally right across the street. One little problem, though: it's been snowing in Northern Italy. A lot. So instead of the big media presser and hot laps, we got... well, this:
I'm pretty sure they trucked it to the track. I mean, could you imagine driving a F1 car... in the snow... on slicks? I suspect the car would be in the wall, on its back, and on fire, within a few feet.
Renault Lotus is next up on Sunday, followed by a F1 MegaPr0n on Monday, when Sauber, Toro Rosso, and defending constructor's champion Red Bull all roll out. See ya then!
1
What's that thing on top of the air scoop? Force India has that, too, but McLaren doesn't.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 03, 2012 09:14 PM (+rSRq)
2
> I suspect the car would be in the wall, on its back, and on fire, within a few feet.
You say that as if it were a bad thing...
Steven I think you are referring to the T-Bar? As far as I know it's a standardized FIA-mandated thingie to hold the on-board camera. McLaren will have one too when they go to race; the car as unveiled has a bump where the standard T-Bar will eventually mount.
That nose bump is horrifying. Caterham and Force India have a sculpted channel down the middle of their bumps, but the Ferrari just has a big honking ramp right there across the nose.
I can't wait to see what Red Bull does this year. If Newey doesn't go for the bump, I think the other teams are going to be second-guessing themselves.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at February 03, 2012 09:30 PM (I55Es)
3
As FDM says, the T-Bar is a required camera mount, designed to be aerodynamically neutral. Every car has one, even if (like McLaren) they don't have it in the glamour shots. It's usually the easiest way to recognize which driver's car you're looking at, too; the "team leader" had a red t-bar, the "second driver" a yellow one. For example, please see this picture from the 2011 GP of Canada, with Jenson Button (yellow) and Lewis Hamilton (red).
There are usually a few other camera points on the car; the FIA will choose more-or-less at random what car gets what camera at what location. If you look at this picture, you'll see a camera mounted just forward of the front-right suspension.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 03, 2012 09:48 PM (DxepM)
4
That thing looks like a major source of drag and turbulence, but if everyone has one then of course it's equal.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 03, 2012 11:16 PM (+rSRq)
5Grace & Formula One
A old axiom in aircraft design is if it looks right it will fly right.
Witness the Lockheed & Boeing battle with the F35 looking right and
winning the contract. I must say the cars so far are a disappointment
except for McLaren, it does has some style and grace. I wonder if the
FIA set this up to discommode Darth Bernie as I'm sure the fans will
hate how Ferrari especially looks.
Posted by: von Krag at February 04, 2012 01:36 PM (XIY2m)
A old axiom in aircraft design is if it looks right it will fly right.
It's also bogus. The Brewster Buffalo looked good, but got slaughtered in the air. On the other hand, the P-38 looked awful, but flew really well.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 04, 2012 04:52 PM (+rSRq)
7
I'd argue that the Buffalo looked more like a beer keg with wings, but agree with you about everything else. I've heard the axiom used in regards to aircraft, ships, cars, you name it, and for every time it's been true, there's a HMS Hood or Fairey Gannet.
One should not read anything into the fact that I chose two pieces of British equipment.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 04, 2012 08:30 PM (DxepM)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2012 06:59 PM (+rSRq)
9
The unique pullrod-type FRONT suspension is explained by Mr. Fry as having center of gravity benefits. I suppose it makes some sense, if you have the place where to put the driver's legs.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at February 09, 2012 07:42 PM (G2mwb)
F1 Pr0n: Force India VJM05
We've had two rollouts to date, and the score is one normal nose (MP4-27), one platypus nose (CT01). The question is, which way would Force India's fifth design, the VJM05, go?
Platypus. Definitely platypus. The people who know these things say that Force India used the same wing for two years, with the team issuing upgrades and developments at various points over those seasons. It appears that the VJM05 is rockin' a new, more complex, front wing that some suggest will be flexi-bendy, like the Red Bull's. If they can pull that off, it'll be a major coup. Remember, Ferrari couldn't make it work, ending up with something that flapped like a hummingbird's wing. This had a rather unfortunate effect on the structural stability of the car.
The sidepods are longer than the McLaren's, but seem to have a bigger undercut to them. Other than that, the chassis seems to be fairly conventional. Smooth airbox.
The platypus nose looks hideous in this picture. Unlike the CT01, this one has a rounded nose, again similar in appearance to the Red Bull designs. Though we can't see it in these shots, I gather that the underside of the nose is also rounded, better to shed air in the direction of the underside of the car and increasing the downforce. The, for lack of a better term, "barge boards" just to the outside of the sidepods seem much more prominent than they do on the other two chassis that have been rolled out thus far. I'm sure they're perfectly legal, but I'll be switched if I like 'em. The nicest rule change in the past five years was the one that got rid of the proliferation of such things; these bring back unpleasant memories.
I suspect this is a make-or-break season for Vijay Mallya's team. It's been five years without a win, only one podium and just one pole, both of which look like flukes. There are reports that Mallya's financial empire is showing cracks; Kingfisher Airlines paid their salaried employees late four months running, for example. If this is truly the case, one could reasonably assume that F1 would prove to be something totally disposable... unless good things start happening in a hurry. We'll see how the VJM05 does down the road!
Ferrari's rollout will be covered tonight.
F1 Pr0n: McLaren MP4-27
McLaren has always seemed to have been of two minds when it comes to their F1 cars. Either they're a little boring or they're completely goofball. Last year's MP4-26 went full goofball, what with the L-shaped air intakes on the sidepods and all. For 2012, it looks like the team from Woking has gone button-down collar and pocket protector on us. Ladies and gentlemen, the MP4-27.
The first thing that leaps out at you is... the more or less normal looking nose. As we'll see in the next picture, all is not as it appears, though in comparison to the Lotus Caterham, it's boring. The air intakes on the sidepods are back to something a little more staid than last year, though they are somewhat... elongated. The section directly under the nose is a little busier than last year.
As with the Caterham before it, the MP4-27 has teeny sculpted sidepods, clearly to steer more air towards the back. As mentioned earlier, the nose doesn't have the stonking great stepdown like the CT01, but it does rather plummet. It's a graceful plummet, but compare it to the MP4-26, and you'll see the difference:
The rear wing of the new car also has... fingers at the bottom of the rear wing assembly. These started to appear on the cars last season, and I'm sure there's something good aerodynamically involved with them, but I'll be switched if I can figure out what it is. I'm not the big brain though, as anybody who's read The Pond could attest to.
No matter how fast the MP4-27 goes, there is one thing you can say about it: it sure is purty. I think they need to go back to the silver rims though. The black just doesn't work.
Now for the best thing of them all: the annual McLaren centerfold! Just click "more" for some sweet sweet Glare On Wheels action, sans staples!
1
Compared to last year, the top scoop is different. It looks smoother, more streamlined.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 01, 2012 09:14 PM (+rSRq)
2
Also, is it a camera angle thing, or does it look like the bottom runs higher than last year? Looks like there's more clearance beneath the car.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 01, 2012 09:16 PM (+rSRq)
3
I think you're right, Steven... I didn't even notice that.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 01, 2012 09:53 PM (DxepM)
4
Yeah, the secondary intakes on the airbox are gone. I think the clearance thing is a camera angle effect; compare the plane of the tops of the front tires and you can tell that the shots are from different heights. Not only are the sidepods very sculpted, it looks like the airbox also tapers more quickly down at the rear.
Now I see that Adrian Sutil has declared that his friendship with Lewis Hamilton is over, after Hamilton failed to testify at Sutil's trial. It's almost too bad Sutil is without a ride this year; he could've given Hamilton someone other than Felipe Massa to crash into...
Posted by: flatdarkmars at February 02, 2012 01:52 AM (I55Es)
5
Much nicer than the platyrham. Hopefully more of the field can make a good looking car within the current regulations.
It does look like the front wing is farther from the ground on this car than last year, but when you account for the viewing angle the front of the under-tray appears to be at pretty close to the same height. And isn't the front wing height something that's adjustable? Certainly the teams change their nose around lot, so it could just be that they've got a nose designed for a different track on.
Posted by: David at February 02, 2012 02:14 PM (+yn5x)
There Is Justice In The World
It's no secret to readers of The Pond that I am a fan of the Chicago Cubs. By extension, therefore, I am a detractor of the St Louis Cardinals. It's as natural as breathing, which Cardinals fans tend to do through their mouth. One cannot be a Cubs fan without hating the Cardinals. I assume Cardinals fans feel the same way about the Cubs, though to be honest I've never met one articulate enough to voice such things. But I digress. Last season, the Cardinals won the World Series, and it would be churlish of me to not congratulate them on having done so. One of the heroes of their run was Skip Schumaker, a 31 year old utility player who still goes by the nickname "Skip." Schumaker, whose name bears a startling resemblance to that of Mercedes F1 driver Slappy Schumacher, was at bat in Game 4 of the NL Divisional Series against the Phillies when a panicked and frightened grey squirrel dashed across home plate.
Yes, this was a real commercial.
Unsurprisingly, St Louis went completely gaga for the squirrel, nicknaming it "The Rally Squirrel" and practically deifying the rodent. T-shirts, songs, plushies, you name it, the Cardinals milked it for all it was worth. Never mind that they had a good team on a hot run, The Rally Squirrel was the MVP.
Today, Topps Inc released an image of Skip Schumaker's 2012 baseball card.
As with most people involved with the St Louis Cardinals, Schumaker has zero sense of humor. "I'm not frustrated, I just think people are going to look at it and
laugh and that's ridiculous," said the 31-year old who still goes by Skip. "I don't care about what I look like or
anything but it's literally just a squirrel that has nothing to do with
me. It's not disappointing, it's just ridiculous"
You just won the World Series, Skippy. Lighten up a bit, particularly since it's a limited edition card that will be replaced with a regular one in a short while. It's funny... get over yourself.
Name This Mystery Ship XI
Well, this is a fine kettle of fish. I received an e-mail this afternoon from the Official First Friend of The Pond, Vaucaunson's Duck. Attached was a challenge: "Name This Mystery Ship." After working on it for an hour or so, I gave up. And now it's your turn... and I don't know the answer!
My guess is that it's a destroyer, destroyer escort, or frigate. The flag looks Dutch, but my searching didn't turn up a match of any sort. I guess it could be a cruiser, but it seems like the armament is awfully light for that.
Name the ship and if Vauc can verify that your guess is correct, you win a post on a topic of your choice! As usual, I won't write about politics, religion or pr0n... anything else is free game. Have at it, y'all!
1
Yep, she's Dutch. And yes, she could be a cruiser, and her armament is awfully light for that, because she's a light cruiser.
The Royal Dutch Navy light crusier Tromp. She was repeatedly claimed sunk by the IJN, apparently. That puts her in good company.
For some time, I've been looking for a ship photo with the idea of stumping Wonderduck. I figured the photo had to be from an off-line source - so I was pleased to find this photo, framed in an antiques store. I initially thought it wasn't online anywhere, but was wrong about that.
Just six hours from posting to solving - the power of the hive mind.
"The ghost ship." Now why wasn't there a counter for it in Victory in the Pacific, like the De Ruyter?.
Posted by: V. Duck at January 30, 2012 10:39 AM (XVJDy)
Apparently I was the only person who didn't know that this was the Tromp. I have an e-mail from Siergen who named it correctly, but admitted to imagesearching for it. I received a textmessage from Brickmuppet two minutes before FDM posted his comment, naming the Tromp.
However, since FDM was the first to leave his guess in the comments, he gets the "prize." Name your post... or should I assume you want another "Name This Mystery Ship"?
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 30, 2012 01:12 PM (OS+Cr)
If you think the Tromp was lightly armed for a cruiser, you might want to take a look at HMS Delhi following her 1941 refit in the US, or the Capitani Romani class as built. Heck, Tromp's sister might even qualify.
C.T.
Posted by: cxt217 at January 30, 2012 07:03 PM (JMzrv)
5
CXT, I still owe you a post... you need to get me a topic, though.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 30, 2012 07:31 PM (f/6aJ)
6
Sorry about that. The last couple months had been hectic, not to mention physically demanding that I had completely forgotten about it.
Posted by: cxt217 at January 30, 2012 08:38 PM (JMzrv)
7
Hehe I spentat least two minutes finding links!
Anyway I can't think of anything in particular, so another Mystery Ship it is!
Posted by: flatdarkmars at January 31, 2012 12:04 AM (I55Es)
8
what happen to old ship. please, anybody explain to me what happen to any old ship. it is not like an airplane where it's would be easy to sell to other country when it get old
.
Posted by: justjoe at April 18, 2012 06:57 AM (N80Xh)
A lot of them do get sold. An American WWII light cruiser was sold to Argentina, who renamed it "General Belgrano". It was sunk by a British submarine during the Falklands war.
But if they can't be sold, usually they're torn apart so the steel can be recycled. Thousands of tons of scrap steel is worth quite a lot.
Sometimes they are ditched in a ship's graveyard, left at anchor to rust away.
Some get taken out to sea and deliberately sunk with scuttling charges. Sometimes this is done to create attractions for scuba divers, in service of the tourist industry. Sometimes they do it in hopes of starting coral reefs.
Sadly, being recycled for razor blades will be the fate of USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65). As much anyone would like to preserver her as a museum ship, the cost and effort involved in removing 8(!) nuclear reactors will leave the ENTERPRISE suitable for nothing else when she decommissions after her current deployment.
I do like the idea of trying to save her island, since that is the most iconic and identifiable part of her. It is a lot easier than saving the entire ship.
Posted by: cxt217 at April 18, 2012 10:34 AM (Y/p7u)
11
Tearing apart any CVN will be challenging. But lifting the reactors out will be a lot easier if all the decking above the reactor is removed first.
The story of the Challenger disaster and the associated fallout has been often told, and I won't repeat it here. What I do want to mention is that I'm one of those few people who was actually watching the launch live on CNN when everything went pear-shaped. The three major networks were showing normal programming; Space Shuttle launches had already become old hat by 1986. To CNN, then only six years old and not the monolithic success it is now, launches were still important news.
And to a young Wonderduck, they were all fascinating. That I had the flu, or something flu-like, was only a minor impediment. I had stayed home from school and was sacked out on the couch, covered with a couple of blankets, as I watched the whole terrible event live. Some say that the loss of the Challenger was my generation's Kennedy Assassination. I suppose that's so. It certainly changed me.
1
Our teacher was showing it live in the classroom.
Awkward.
Posted by: GreyDuck at January 29, 2012 10:32 AM (eHm8o)
2
I was in the school bookstore at Drexel when someone said the Shuttle blew up, so I went over to the student center and watched the TV, heart in my guts.
Posted by: Mauser at January 29, 2012 08:44 PM (cZPoz)
3
I always had a closer connection (for lack of a better word) to Columbia. Maybe because it was the first. I know the Challenger disaster affected me; I found a little essay I wrote voluntarily amongst keepsakes and memorabilia recently. Still, it was just one of those big, dumb accidents at the time. The Columbia accident really tore me up, though. Of course, that's coming up here in a few days. History can be funny (odd funny, not ha ha funny, in this case) sometimes.
Posted by: Ben at January 30, 2012 11:47 AM (RalIr)
4
I blame Environmentalists for Columbia. They changed the foam formulation because environmentalists objected to the chemicals given off by the foam curing. That's the old foam that actually stayed on the tanks. NASA ended up sacrificing seven lives on that Green Altar.
Posted by: Mauser at January 31, 2012 05:00 AM (cZPoz)
5
Except that Columbia was using one of the last of the old tanks, with the older foam formulation.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at January 31, 2012 06:08 AM (+rSRq)
AS-204
45 years ago today, the US space program suffered the first fatalities of its history. Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee died during a routine training mission when their Apollo capsule caught fire. The conflagration was aided by a 100% oxygen atmosphere in the capsule. A single ignition source was unable to be found. A study did find, however, that the standard nylon astronaut pressure suit of the time could generate enough static electricity to create a spark just from regular movement in the capsule's flight seats.
Grissom, White, Chaffee
Their mission was officially designated Apollo-Saturn 204, or AS-204, until April 24, 1967. At that time, NASA retired the name Apollo 1 in their honor.
Sadly, they would not be the last to die in mankind's quest for space.
1
Indeed they weren't. I knew Richard Scobee when I was a little kid. Don't remember much about him personally, but he took me to NASA once for a tour. I didn't have a lot of interest in the space program after Challenger.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at January 28, 2012 12:53 AM (GJQTS)
2
And Google chooses to commemorate the 125th anniversary of the "world's largest snowflake". *facepalm*
Posted by: Ed Hering at January 28, 2012 01:07 PM (4deSp)
3
In their defense, if they commemorated every great tragedy their site would look pretty bleak.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 30, 2012 05:37 AM (PiXy!)
F1 Pr0n: Caterham CT01
Historically, the opening of the F1 season comes when Ferrari debuts their new challenger. They are always the first. Pride of place should be with them, truth be told. It's not like they aren't the oldest and most famous team in Formula 1, after all. Which makes the first debut of the year all the weirder, because it's not the oldest team, but one of the newest, which rolled out their steed. The team that was Lotus and now is Caterham stole a march on the big guys today, releasing pictures of the CT01. Ladies and gentlemen, F1 Pr0n is back!
Some interesting stuff here from Caterham. The sidepods are shorter, making for a more compact, almost wasp-waisted, chassis. Unseen in the picture above is that there's a vent in the back of the airbox to add cooling to that which the smaller sidepods lose. The exhausts are low-mounted and positioned in the lee of the sidepod's airflow. The leader at the clubhouse turn is that they'll blow over the lower elements of the rear wing, trying to claw back some of the downforce lost by the banning of blown diffusers. However, the F1 sites across the interwebs are all abuzz over the nose.
To be charitable, it's not pretty. To not be charitable, it might be the ugliest nose since the 2004 Williams "Walrusnose"... or this one. Unfortunately, that stepdown is mandated by the new tech regulations. Yes, really. It's a safety feature, designed to keep cars from being launched, somehow. I think it accomplishes the feat by being so repulsive that no self-respecting F1 chassis would deign to approach it. I tells ya, Morty, it's like it got taken back behind the woodshed and got beaten with the ugly stick. And because the rules require that the nose be no more than 550mm above the ground, but the rest of the body has to be 650mm above, we'll probably see this on EVERY car this year.
BEHOLD! The era of the ugly F1 car is upon us, and woe be unto those who think that the individualism of the teams is being legislated out of the sport by the FIA.
The next rollout is McLaren on February 1st! See you then for more F1 Pr0n!
From Daylight to Warbonnets
A lot of railfans love the locomotives. They like being able to look at these huge pieces of machinery and be able to rattle off statistics about how much horsepower it has, or how much it can pull, or how many of them there are, or whatever. And who can blame 'em? One of the (few) things I appreciate about diesels is that the railroads realized that they could be painted in company colors... and so they were. And what colors! Everywhere you went, the most boring of engines could be made interesting by the various liveries. For example, as a young duckling here in Northern Illinois, one of the most common railroad lines to see was the Chicago Central, a junior member of the Illinois Central company. They ran from Chicago to Iowa with a spur going north to Albert Lea, MN... a more boring trackmap would be difficult to find. But then you saw the locomotives.
Cardinal and White, and they look glorious. I don't even know if the company is around anymore or if they were om nom nommed by CN when they took the Illinois Central, but I still remember the plain but beautiful look of the engines.
But that's just the tip of the iceberg. Let's take a look at some of the better known and beautiful liveries throughout rail history, shall we?
1
Chicago Central as a company still exists under the Grand Trunk holding company
I wouldn't call it legendary, but I still fondly remember Chessie System's colors from when I was growing up.
Posted by: JP Gibb at January 25, 2012 07:47 AM (VSD03)
2
I didn't get to see too many trains growing up in the middle of Los
Angeles, but every time we went out to the desert or into the Sierras
we'd see trains and I'd be pressed up against the window of the car
counting cars, checking out the locos, etc. I remember seeing lots of
Santa Fe, Union Pacific, and Southern Pacific locos going through Mojave and up either side of the Sierras.
In my board game heydays, my gaming group like to play the railroad games like Empire Builder, 1830, 1856, etc. It was amusing a while back when I was talking to a train fanatic, and I knew more about which lines ran to what cities and what kinds of loads they would deliver than he did. Of course I wasn't anywhere near his league on the trains themselves.
Posted by: David at January 25, 2012 11:41 AM (+yn5x)
3
Most of the rail lines had someone in the art department at either GM or ALCO create their livery in the early days of diesel. The "Warbonnet" scheme even has a US Patent (which is odd, since as a paint scheme you'd think it'd be a copyright), but the patent holder was a GM employee.
Posted by: Ranger Rick at January 28, 2012 01:19 AM (wQTBU)
Random Anime Picture #68: What, Again? -Sora no Woto, Ep13
Didn't I just do one of these a couple of days ago? Well, yes, yes I did. Except that one actually had a point to it (i.e., don't watch Kill Me Baby). This one, on the other hand, is some attempt at an explanation of my lack of actual content here at The Pond of late. One could argue that it's been 18 days since my last post of any real value. I will concede the point. It's not like I don't have big things to write about... indeed, I've got two major posts staring me in the face (Best Late War Fighters, Katawa Shoujo).
Thing is... I just don't feel like writing. Part of it is work-related; we've been going great guns all month in preparation for the start of Spring classes, which occurred this week. Tuesday, to be exact, which might tell you just how sick I really was this past Wednesday. Anyway, work is part of it. The aforementioned Katawa Shoujo and Skyrim are also reasons why I haven't blogged much. It may not be a coincidence that my output went through the floor the same day that KS was released. I'm enjoying my time in two radically different imaginary worlds for radically different reasons. I just... look, I've been here at The Pond for a long time (well, in blog time at least). I still enjoy blogging, it's just a different sort of enjoyment now.
Back in the "old days," when nobody knew who this Wonderduck guy was, I wrote to a) entertain myself; and b) make people aware that there was a hyperintelligent duck with phenomenal (for a duck) typing skills out there who might have some interesting things to say. Then once I got noticed by a few folks who decided to stick around, the "new day" of blogging dawned. In some ways, I felt I had to keep one-upping myself. This led to mammoth posts that took waaaaaaay too long to write; 4100 words and eight hours? For an episode of Rio Rainbow Gate!?
Maybe I'm just getting old, but the immense need to write seems to have gone away at some point over the past few months. Maybe having that tooth pulled let it all leak out? I'm not going anywhere, don't fret none 'bout that. I'm not even taking a hiatus. I'm just... going to take it easy for a bit. Not for long, and you might not even notice a difference, but I'm going to stress less about blogging and try to have myself a little fun again.
Besides, the F1 thing starts up in earnest this week when Caterham rolls out their 2012 car to begin the F1 Pr0n season. I weep for my lost weekends...
1
Could be worse, you could be like me and write long anime reviews that nobody apparently reads. It would probably help if I did more current stuff, rather than the things I've been getting from NetFlix....
I also have a LiveJournal, but I had to make all the personal entries private because I had a stalker. An amazingly pathetic one, but a stalker nonetheless, so the audience there is limited to about 60, maybe, if they haven't all migrated to Facebook. That and Russian spammers on the public entries (the politics stuff).
I get more readers for my Mad Scientist porn on DeviantArt than I do for my blogs.
Posted by: Mauser at January 22, 2012 06:33 AM (cZPoz)
2
Mauser, I read them. FWIW it took a couple of years of writing and a couple of lucky breaks for me to have any readers at all.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 22, 2012 09:17 AM (f/6aJ)
3
Also FWIW, I too double-space the break after a period. I thought I was the only person who did.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 22, 2012 09:21 AM (f/6aJ)
4
Speaking of F1, I'm not sure Bahrain will happen again this year. The Shia are very restive to the Sunni elite & Iran is sticking it's big nose in the mix. A good overview is here: http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/pothot/20120123.aspx
Posted by: von Krag at January 23, 2012 10:40 AM (XIY2m)
5
I was taught waaay back when to use a double space after a period. Apparently this was never actually official per any style guides, and there is some controversy about why a lot of typing instructors set their students on that path.
Posted by: David at January 23, 2012 01:44 PM (+yn5x)
6
Take my ducks to Wisconsin? ME? I am offended, David.
VK, yeah, I know. My desire to write about F1 right now is somewhat near zero.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 23, 2012 07:21 PM (f/6aJ)
7
The problem with long reviews is how fragmented the field and the tastes are. With 40 new series every season, and a person of average free time following perhaps 3 at best, you have to hit big to evoke any kind of response. I essentially ignore anything on the Net that is not Idolmaster, for example.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at January 24, 2012 04:15 PM (G2mwb)
8
But Wonderduck, some of your flock is from Wisconsin...
Posted by: Siergen at January 24, 2012 07:13 PM (PBxDs)
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 24, 2012 07:21 PM (f/6aJ)
10
Heh, now you've got me thinking back to try to remember which blog/site I mentioned the double space thing on and just how much you've read.... *grin*
Posted by: Mauser at January 25, 2012 05:43 AM (cZPoz)