February 20, 2015
I don't know if any of you know of the Wonderlic... football fans will have heard of it, but maybe not anybody else? Anyway, it purports to be "an aptitude test for learning and problem solving for a range of professions." Okay, cool. A score of zero means you're functionally the same as a chair located in a completely different room from the testing computer. A perfect score is 50. A score of 20 is supposed to indicate "average intelligence", roughly equating to an IQ of 100. An example question might be "When a rope is selling 20 cents per 2 feet, how many feet can you buy for 30 dollars?" Prospective football players heading into the NFL draft have to take the Wonderlic; the lowest score ever was a 4, by Morris Claiborne in 2012. Your average quarterback gets a 24. Electrical Engineers average a 30 on the test. I scored a 35. The HR person, who has administered this test "thousands of times" said she's never had anybody score that high before.
Then we moved onto the real testing. I was handed six pages of questions regarding medical billing, coding and insurance payments, three books of medical codes, a calculator, a pencil, and told "good luck." The first question was "what is the official name of form used in Example #1?" The second question was "knowing the reason of the visit from the ICD code, was the diagnosis code listed accurate?"
Sure enough, three hours after I walked in I finished the final page of questions. It was actually quite a clever test, assuming what I'm thinking is correct. From where I was sitting, it sure as hell felt like it was testing the subject's ability to reason out difficult problems without guidance, experience in the subject matter, or indeed, any clue what was going on. I guess I did okay; the HR rep didn't grade it with me standing over her... and a damn good thing, too, because I have no idea how I actually did. I'm going to pretend that I didn't outright suck and go with that.
I'm also going to take a nap. That was friggin' exhausting. Holy crepe.
Posted by: Siergen at February 20, 2015 09:59 PM (ohSuC)
Also: Nice score, dude.
Posted by: GreyDuck at February 21, 2015 12:59 AM (AQ0bN)
The goal was to see what questions they'd ask. We'd already seen their resume and knew they could write code. (Actually, that turned out not to be true either, but the test washed those guys out as well.)
If they asked a sensible question, or pointed out that the problem couldn't be solved as stated, they got the second page.
Junior programmers got the same test, but they got both pages.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 21, 2015 08:00 AM (2yngH)
Bravo Zulu, amigo. Outstanding.
Posted by: The Old Man at February 21, 2015 09:13 AM (o6+UC)
Posted by: muon at February 22, 2015 04:14 AM (XIprt)
Round and round we go...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 23, 2015 05:10 PM (2yngH)
There's a saying in hospitals: the chart is not the patient.
Likewise it is true: the credential is not the man (er... the person).
Myself, I had a 25 year career as a software engineer and I am a college dropout. However, the US Patent Office (for instance) didn't care about that.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 23, 2015 10:20 PM (+rSRq)
49 queries taking 0.1272 seconds, 274 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.