Grumblerumblerazzin'frazzin'...
Oh yeah, I'm lovin' life right now, and I'm NOT in a good mood.
That about covers it...
As the Regional Manager said the other day, "when things go south, it's Wonderduck who suffers." For at least the rest of the week, I'll be running the Duck U Bookstore. For at least the rest of the week, I'm also the entire staff of the Duck U Bookstore. That's right, I'm open to close, alone, all day every day. On one hand, yay overtime. On the other hand, boo working myself into the ground. On the gripping hand, kill me.
"But Wonderduck," I hear you say, which is impressive because I'm blasting a track by Galynerus at about 25% volume, which is loud enough to shake ducks off my two computer hutches, and couldn't actually hear anybody unless they were yelling in my ear... in fact, here, join me, won't you?
"But Wonderduck," I hear you say, "at least the textbook rush is over, right?" Yep, it's over all right... which means it's time to send books back to their publishers. Hundreds of books. Thousands of pounds of books. Alone. Oh my achin' back. Oh, and let's not forget the complaining customers... "no, you can't return the lab manual you've torn 12 pages out of... please stop swearing at me, miss."
I haven't watched any anime in over a week, and that was just a single episode of Bodacious Space Pirates. So here's what I'm going to do: I'm going to go watch some anime and the Williams F1 Pr0n can bugger off until I feel like doing it (tomorrow or whenever). Meanwhile, you folks have a whole comments section to play around in until I get back. Have fun, don't make a mess.
Posted by: brickmuppet at February 08, 2012 08:14 PM (EJaOX)
2
Any time I'm prone to thinking my life is a pain, I can always count on you to cheer me up.... I just wish you could do it in a less painful manner to yourself.
Posted by: ubu at February 08, 2012 08:22 PM (GfCSm)
F1 Pr0n: Red Bull RB8
While the boys from Milton Keynes debuted their 2012 challenger yesterday, it wasn't much of a much. Instead of actually showing the car in any way, they released a couple of renders and a crappy video. However, with today being the start of Winter Testing in Jerez, Spain, we got to REALLY see the RB8 for the first time today. Or, at least, we did once it finally took to the track some four hours late. Seems the delivery of some important part of the car was delayed by fog at the airport. Whoopsie.
Well, that's different. Red Bull's solution to the platypus nose is to hollow it out... which makes sense, once you think about it. That vent is certainly being used to cool the driver, the electronics, or both. It probably does away with a lot of the drag caused by the stairstep, too... or at least removes much of the disturbed airflow from where it'd do the most damage, aerodynamically. The sidepod inlets are smaller in comparison to last year's runaway winner, though not dramatically so.
In fact, there aren't all that many changes from the RB7 (above, bottom). I mean, beyond the obvious platypus nose. The airbox cover doesn't have the thin fin any longer and the verticals on the rear wing are now square with dangling "fingers", as opposed to the curved cut of last year's car. The sidepods don't look as high, but they also don't seem to slope down as far. So, not many obvious changes, but that shouldn't be a surprise... I mean, it's not like the RB7 wasn't the best car around in 2011 or anything. As I mentioned last year, any changes are probably under the skin.
After looking at the slot in the nose, I think we've finally figured out where Mark Webber and Seb Vettel have to slide their timecards. That nose might just be the worst of the bunch... what is it that it reminds me of? Oh... oh yeah, I've got it.
F1 MegaPr0n: Lotus, Sauber and Toro Rosso
It's been a busy couple of days in the F1 rollout season! Four teams brought out their 2012 challengers... and only one of them, Sauber, released glamour shots of their car. So for a F1 MegaPr0n, we only have a few workable pictures, and there's only one angle that all three of the teams in this MegaPr0n used. Fortunately, it's the three-quarters angle, which is the most useful for our purposes. Ladies and gentlemen, the first ever F1 mini-MegaPr0n! First up, Renault Lotus!
Proof that it's possible to make a good looking platypus nosed F1 car. Of course, this isn't surprising, because the Renault Lotus E20 appears to be last year's Renault Renault! It appears that the team had to do quite a bit of engineering work to re-route the forward facing exhaust system to meet the tech regs, and as a result development on the rest of the car stagnated. The platypus nose is nothing particularly difficult to accomplish, obviously. However, Renault Lotus actually managed to make this one look good... or at least, not as awful as all the others. It's not the hideous ramp that Ferrari has, nor is it the "hills and valley" used by the other teams. Other than those changes, though, it really is the Renault Renault R31, all over again. That may not be a horrible thing.
Like Renault Lotus, Sauber's C31 seems to be a C30 in 2012 regulations, there are a few changes. Obviously the platypus nose is present... but the hump has a trick involved. There's a thin gap where the nosecone meets the hump, apparently an attempt to disrupt a little bit of the drag that'll undoubtedly be created by the thing. Will it work? Who knows? Other changes are a touch more subtle. The sidepods, which were already cut down last year, have been even smaller and more rounded. The top of the car from the cockpit to the front tires is flat; last year it actually was angled up from the cockpit to the tires. The whole chassis is very clean, almost austere in looks. I rather like it. The biggest change, though, is the addition of Oerlikon as a sponsor. Does this mean there's a 20mm autocannon hidden in the airbox?
Toro Rosso's STR7 has a "hills-and-valley" approach to the platypus, which is as good as any, I suppose. I suppose it's boring to say that it's very similar to last year's STR6, so I won't... though it is. The sidepods are shorter and more deeply cut than those on last year's car, which should remove quite a bit of parasitic drag from the chassis. The airbox has an interesting support arrangement to it now, and under the main intake, there's a second intake, presumably for cooling the KERS unit. Something that isn't particularly visible in the pictures of the cars rolled out to date is the position of the exhausts. Toro Rosso's is set about as far back as they can legally go, and their position seems to be blowing right onto the rear wing. "We can't use a blown diffuser, but nobody said anything about a blown rear wing," seems to be the plan.
In an interview with Toro Rosso's designer, Georgio Ascanelli, I finally heard an explanation for the new nose height. It seems that the maximum height of 550mm is the same as the height of the anti-penetration panels on the sides of the cockpit. It was done to prevent an impalement, which of course we've seen dozens of times in the past couple of years alone (/sarcasm off). A solution looking for a problem...
Now, sharp-eyed readers might have noticed that I said that there had been FOUR rollouts over the past two days, yet I've only shown three. That's because the fourth team was Red Bull, and all they let us see were a couple of cheap renders of the car they'll be defending their title with. With the first offseason practice session beginning on Tuesday, I expect we'll be seeing a little more than that tomorrow, so I'll hit it and Williams then!
Katawa Shoujo: The Review
Over five years ago, a particular bit of colorized doujin art from the year 2000 made its way to the 4chan image boards, where it made quite the splash. So much of one that some denizens of that board decided to follow the original artist's intentions and turn the artwork into a ren'ai game. Two years later, the group (now calling itself 4Leaf Studios, or "4LS") brought out a demo. The demo, entitled "Act I", was a hit and brought quite a bit of attention to the game. And then... three more years would pass before 4LS announced that the full game would be released before the end of 2011. Shortly before that deadline, they moved the date to January 4th, 2012; five years to the day that a particular bit of colorized doujin art hit 4chan.
Nobody on the staff of 4LS had ever made a game before. The amount of work involved in such an endeavor is daunting, but they certainly pulled it off; they did release a game. The question, though, is just how good is it? To be truthful, it's hard to imagine it being any good at all considering the topic material. Disabled high school students? A dating sim about disabled high school students? Controversial, to say the least. When Act I came out, a common reaction was "...that game makes me ill, what's wrong with those people?" So now that the full version has been released, what's the real verdict?
I did torrent this when you recommended it, but I haven't had time to even install it. I have no idea when I might have time to play with it.
Posted by: Mauser at February 07, 2012 06:04 AM (cZPoz)
2
Had a 60km run... See You Space Cowboy, Rainbow Wizard, and What Were You Waiting For? in one run, that started off with a bunch of bad bounces. Misha, Misha, and more Misha... I think Hisao did the last 35km continuously on fire, too.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at February 09, 2012 05:22 AM (GJQTS)
Name This Mystery Ship XII
Might be a fun one this time... or it might be ridiculously easy. It'll be one of the two, for sure.
Usual rules apply: no Imagesearch or anything like that. I can't do anything about it, but your victory will be tainted and hagridden. If you DO win, you get a post on a topic of your choice! While I don't do politics, religion or pr0n (other than F1 Pr0n), anything else is fair game.
Time for a naval "what if?" I've read that the Nazi long range plan was to start WW II in 1943, by which time they would have a "balanced fleet", including at least one aircraft carrier. They had already built and were testing aircraft for it, including a carrier-based version of the Ju87 Stuka.
My questions is, assuming that their plans worked out, and the second World War started in 1943 at a time and stiuation of their choosing, what would they use their aircract carrier for? I don't think anyone would consider using a carrier to support an invasion across the narrow English channel, and they expected a quick war where interdicting convoys would not be a factor, so what did they plan on doing with it?
Posted by: Siergen at February 05, 2012 12:40 PM (3/gGt)
Remember the Bismarck? Think that would have gone the same if Bismarck had been accompanied by a carrier?
Germany's naval problem was that all their major ports were bottled up. They could build big ships, but they couldn't get them out into the open sea to fight with them.
A blue water fleet with carrier air support could have done something about Gibralter, for example. (Or at least tried.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2012 02:25 PM (+rSRq)
There were three strategic constrictions between the German ship-building ports on the Baltic and the open ocean. Denmark was the first, but that could be solved by land invasion.
The second was the section of sea between Scotland and Norway. The third was the line between Scotland and Greenland.
Bismarck actually made it past all three of them, but only by shedding all its escorts and proceeding alone.
...and it would have made it, had it not been spotted by a PBY, and then attacked at long range by English carrier-based biplanes. A German carrier would have made all the difference.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2012 02:29 PM (+rSRq)
No guarantees the fighters from a German carrier would have shot down the PBY before it made its report (Even the Kido Butai did not have that much success doing so.) and considering the weather conditions in the fatal torpedo attack, it would have been doubtful any fighters would have made it into the air. Of course, Goering did all he could to insure German naval aviation was stillborn - flying an ME 109 in the North Atlantic sounds positively insane.
Germany could have completed the Graf Zeppelin and maybe the Z Plan as well, but what would they have given up to free the materials for it? Germany faced major resource and industrial shortages even before the war, far more than most people realize, and the Kriegsmarine usually ended up at the back of the bus since its was less important than the Army or influential as the Luftwaffe. Even the projected date of 1945 would not have been possible, given the competing demands - it is implied that the first of the H-class battleships would have not been completed until 1946, even if their construction had not been postponed/cancelled by the war.
Of course, that also ignores what the other nations would be doing. Nothing would be unsettling to a German crew than to break out into the Atlantic during 1944, only to find Lion and Temeraire and maybe a sister or four waiting for them.
Posted by: cxt217 at February 05, 2012 03:00 PM (DkLfO)
F1 Pr0n: Ferrari F2012
You know something's kinda wrong when no less a light than Stefano Domenicali, team principal for Scuderia Ferrari, comes out and publicly says "Well, actually, it’s not really so pretty from my personal perspective. But this is a value that doesn’t count in Formula 1... ...as our chairman has already said the fact that it is ugly or very nice
doesn’t count a lot. The most important thing is that the car has to be
performing." In other words, "winning fixes ugly." Having said that, Ferrari better win a lot of races this season, because the new F2012 is a lot of ugly.
Though to be honest, from the front it looks not so bad at all. The front wing is supposedly evolved from the flexi-bendy wing they ran at the end of the 2011 season. For their sake, I hope they got the "oscillating like a USGS seismometer in a magnitude 9.5 earthquake" feature fixed. There were times when I wondered how the Red cars were able to stay on the track, even going in a straight line, because of that wing flapping like an ornithopter.
From the side, it still doesn't look so bad. Like the McLaren, there appears to be an angle (back-to-front) to the floor. The sidepods are deeply undercut, more like the Force India than the McLaren, though not the same sort of profile. Amazing how so many teams can do the same thing, but come up with completely different designs. It'll be interesting to see which one comes off the best. One thing that comes back from past designs is the weird double rear bodywork thingy on the engine cover. I've never been fond of that design element, and it doesn't look any better here. It looks like the engine cover came off the sprue badly and nobody bothered to trim the flash off.
...and now the hideousness of the nose becomes apparent. Yeesh... if anything, it may be worse than the Lotus Caterham and the Force India solutions. However, this does raise an interesting question: just how did McLaren's nose fit under the technical regulations while a team like Ferrari does... this? Interesting that there's another fin between the front wheels; haven't seen that before, have we? According to the team, the car is almost all brand new, with very little coming over from the F150° Italia. I gather the rear wing is pretty much the same, with just some very minor tweaking.
The Scuderia was to have a huge blowout at the Ferrari factory at Maranello, followed by a few laps at the team's test track, literally right across the street. One little problem, though: it's been snowing in Northern Italy. A lot. So instead of the big media presser and hot laps, we got... well, this:
I'm pretty sure they trucked it to the track. I mean, could you imagine driving a F1 car... in the snow... on slicks? I suspect the car would be in the wall, on its back, and on fire, within a few feet.
Renault Lotus is next up on Sunday, followed by a F1 MegaPr0n on Monday, when Sauber, Toro Rosso, and defending constructor's champion Red Bull all roll out. See ya then!
1
What's that thing on top of the air scoop? Force India has that, too, but McLaren doesn't.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 03, 2012 09:14 PM (+rSRq)
2
> I suspect the car would be in the wall, on its back, and on fire, within a few feet.
You say that as if it were a bad thing...
Steven I think you are referring to the T-Bar? As far as I know it's a standardized FIA-mandated thingie to hold the on-board camera. McLaren will have one too when they go to race; the car as unveiled has a bump where the standard T-Bar will eventually mount.
That nose bump is horrifying. Caterham and Force India have a sculpted channel down the middle of their bumps, but the Ferrari just has a big honking ramp right there across the nose.
I can't wait to see what Red Bull does this year. If Newey doesn't go for the bump, I think the other teams are going to be second-guessing themselves.
Posted by: flatdarkmars at February 03, 2012 09:30 PM (I55Es)
3
As FDM says, the T-Bar is a required camera mount, designed to be aerodynamically neutral. Every car has one, even if (like McLaren) they don't have it in the glamour shots. It's usually the easiest way to recognize which driver's car you're looking at, too; the "team leader" had a red t-bar, the "second driver" a yellow one. For example, please see this picture from the 2011 GP of Canada, with Jenson Button (yellow) and Lewis Hamilton (red).
There are usually a few other camera points on the car; the FIA will choose more-or-less at random what car gets what camera at what location. If you look at this picture, you'll see a camera mounted just forward of the front-right suspension.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 03, 2012 09:48 PM (DxepM)
4
That thing looks like a major source of drag and turbulence, but if everyone has one then of course it's equal.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 03, 2012 11:16 PM (+rSRq)
5Grace & Formula One
A old axiom in aircraft design is if it looks right it will fly right.
Witness the Lockheed & Boeing battle with the F35 looking right and
winning the contract. I must say the cars so far are a disappointment
except for McLaren, it does has some style and grace. I wonder if the
FIA set this up to discommode Darth Bernie as I'm sure the fans will
hate how Ferrari especially looks.
Posted by: von Krag at February 04, 2012 01:36 PM (XIY2m)
A old axiom in aircraft design is if it looks right it will fly right.
It's also bogus. The Brewster Buffalo looked good, but got slaughtered in the air. On the other hand, the P-38 looked awful, but flew really well.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 04, 2012 04:52 PM (+rSRq)
7
I'd argue that the Buffalo looked more like a beer keg with wings, but agree with you about everything else. I've heard the axiom used in regards to aircraft, ships, cars, you name it, and for every time it's been true, there's a HMS Hood or Fairey Gannet.
One should not read anything into the fact that I chose two pieces of British equipment.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 04, 2012 08:30 PM (DxepM)
F1 Pr0n: Force India VJM05
We've had two rollouts to date, and the score is one normal nose (MP4-27), one platypus nose (CT01). The question is, which way would Force India's fifth design, the VJM05, go?
Platypus. Definitely platypus. The people who know these things say that Force India used the same wing for two years, with the team issuing upgrades and developments at various points over those seasons. It appears that the VJM05 is rockin' a new, more complex, front wing that some suggest will be flexi-bendy, like the Red Bull's. If they can pull that off, it'll be a major coup. Remember, Ferrari couldn't make it work, ending up with something that flapped like a hummingbird's wing. This had a rather unfortunate effect on the structural stability of the car.
The sidepods are longer than the McLaren's, but seem to have a bigger undercut to them. Other than that, the chassis seems to be fairly conventional. Smooth airbox.
The platypus nose looks hideous in this picture. Unlike the CT01, this one has a rounded nose, again similar in appearance to the Red Bull designs. Though we can't see it in these shots, I gather that the underside of the nose is also rounded, better to shed air in the direction of the underside of the car and increasing the downforce. The, for lack of a better term, "barge boards" just to the outside of the sidepods seem much more prominent than they do on the other two chassis that have been rolled out thus far. I'm sure they're perfectly legal, but I'll be switched if I like 'em. The nicest rule change in the past five years was the one that got rid of the proliferation of such things; these bring back unpleasant memories.
I suspect this is a make-or-break season for Vijay Mallya's team. It's been five years without a win, only one podium and just one pole, both of which look like flukes. There are reports that Mallya's financial empire is showing cracks; Kingfisher Airlines paid their salaried employees late four months running, for example. If this is truly the case, one could reasonably assume that F1 would prove to be something totally disposable... unless good things start happening in a hurry. We'll see how the VJM05 does down the road!
Ferrari's rollout will be covered tonight.
F1 Pr0n: McLaren MP4-27
McLaren has always seemed to have been of two minds when it comes to their F1 cars. Either they're a little boring or they're completely goofball. Last year's MP4-26 went full goofball, what with the L-shaped air intakes on the sidepods and all. For 2012, it looks like the team from Woking has gone button-down collar and pocket protector on us. Ladies and gentlemen, the MP4-27.
The first thing that leaps out at you is... the more or less normal looking nose. As we'll see in the next picture, all is not as it appears, though in comparison to the Lotus Caterham, it's boring. The air intakes on the sidepods are back to something a little more staid than last year, though they are somewhat... elongated. The section directly under the nose is a little busier than last year.
As with the Caterham before it, the MP4-27 has teeny sculpted sidepods, clearly to steer more air towards the back. As mentioned earlier, the nose doesn't have the stonking great stepdown like the CT01, but it does rather plummet. It's a graceful plummet, but compare it to the MP4-26, and you'll see the difference:
The rear wing of the new car also has... fingers at the bottom of the rear wing assembly. These started to appear on the cars last season, and I'm sure there's something good aerodynamically involved with them, but I'll be switched if I can figure out what it is. I'm not the big brain though, as anybody who's read The Pond could attest to.
No matter how fast the MP4-27 goes, there is one thing you can say about it: it sure is purty. I think they need to go back to the silver rims though. The black just doesn't work.
Now for the best thing of them all: the annual McLaren centerfold! Just click "more" for some sweet sweet Glare On Wheels action, sans staples!
1
Compared to last year, the top scoop is different. It looks smoother, more streamlined.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 01, 2012 09:14 PM (+rSRq)
2
Also, is it a camera angle thing, or does it look like the bottom runs higher than last year? Looks like there's more clearance beneath the car.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 01, 2012 09:16 PM (+rSRq)
3
I think you're right, Steven... I didn't even notice that.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 01, 2012 09:53 PM (DxepM)
4
Yeah, the secondary intakes on the airbox are gone. I think the clearance thing is a camera angle effect; compare the plane of the tops of the front tires and you can tell that the shots are from different heights. Not only are the sidepods very sculpted, it looks like the airbox also tapers more quickly down at the rear.
Now I see that Adrian Sutil has declared that his friendship with Lewis Hamilton is over, after Hamilton failed to testify at Sutil's trial. It's almost too bad Sutil is without a ride this year; he could've given Hamilton someone other than Felipe Massa to crash into...
Posted by: flatdarkmars at February 02, 2012 01:52 AM (I55Es)
5
Much nicer than the platyrham. Hopefully more of the field can make a good looking car within the current regulations.
It does look like the front wing is farther from the ground on this car than last year, but when you account for the viewing angle the front of the under-tray appears to be at pretty close to the same height. And isn't the front wing height something that's adjustable? Certainly the teams change their nose around lot, so it could just be that they've got a nose designed for a different track on.
Posted by: David at February 02, 2012 02:14 PM (+yn5x)
There Is Justice In The World
It's no secret to readers of The Pond that I am a fan of the Chicago Cubs. By extension, therefore, I am a detractor of the St Louis Cardinals. It's as natural as breathing, which Cardinals fans tend to do through their mouth. One cannot be a Cubs fan without hating the Cardinals. I assume Cardinals fans feel the same way about the Cubs, though to be honest I've never met one articulate enough to voice such things. But I digress. Last season, the Cardinals won the World Series, and it would be churlish of me to not congratulate them on having done so. One of the heroes of their run was Skip Schumaker, a 31 year old utility player who still goes by the nickname "Skip." Schumaker, whose name bears a startling resemblance to that of Mercedes F1 driver Slappy Schumacher, was at bat in Game 4 of the NL Divisional Series against the Phillies when a panicked and frightened grey squirrel dashed across home plate.
Yes, this was a real commercial.
Unsurprisingly, St Louis went completely gaga for the squirrel, nicknaming it "The Rally Squirrel" and practically deifying the rodent. T-shirts, songs, plushies, you name it, the Cardinals milked it for all it was worth. Never mind that they had a good team on a hot run, The Rally Squirrel was the MVP.
Today, Topps Inc released an image of Skip Schumaker's 2012 baseball card.
As with most people involved with the St Louis Cardinals, Schumaker has zero sense of humor. "I'm not frustrated, I just think people are going to look at it and
laugh and that's ridiculous," said the 31-year old who still goes by Skip. "I don't care about what I look like or
anything but it's literally just a squirrel that has nothing to do with
me. It's not disappointing, it's just ridiculous"
You just won the World Series, Skippy. Lighten up a bit, particularly since it's a limited edition card that will be replaced with a regular one in a short while. It's funny... get over yourself.
Name This Mystery Ship XI
Well, this is a fine kettle of fish. I received an e-mail this afternoon from the Official First Friend of The Pond, Vaucaunson's Duck. Attached was a challenge: "Name This Mystery Ship." After working on it for an hour or so, I gave up. And now it's your turn... and I don't know the answer!
My guess is that it's a destroyer, destroyer escort, or frigate. The flag looks Dutch, but my searching didn't turn up a match of any sort. I guess it could be a cruiser, but it seems like the armament is awfully light for that.
Name the ship and if Vauc can verify that your guess is correct, you win a post on a topic of your choice! As usual, I won't write about politics, religion or pr0n... anything else is free game. Have at it, y'all!
1
Yep, she's Dutch. And yes, she could be a cruiser, and her armament is awfully light for that, because she's a light cruiser.
The Royal Dutch Navy light crusier Tromp. She was repeatedly claimed sunk by the IJN, apparently. That puts her in good company.
For some time, I've been looking for a ship photo with the idea of stumping Wonderduck. I figured the photo had to be from an off-line source - so I was pleased to find this photo, framed in an antiques store. I initially thought it wasn't online anywhere, but was wrong about that.
Just six hours from posting to solving - the power of the hive mind.
"The ghost ship." Now why wasn't there a counter for it in Victory in the Pacific, like the De Ruyter?.
Posted by: V. Duck at January 30, 2012 10:39 AM (XVJDy)
Apparently I was the only person who didn't know that this was the Tromp. I have an e-mail from Siergen who named it correctly, but admitted to imagesearching for it. I received a textmessage from Brickmuppet two minutes before FDM posted his comment, naming the Tromp.
However, since FDM was the first to leave his guess in the comments, he gets the "prize." Name your post... or should I assume you want another "Name This Mystery Ship"?
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 30, 2012 01:12 PM (OS+Cr)
If you think the Tromp was lightly armed for a cruiser, you might want to take a look at HMS Delhi following her 1941 refit in the US, or the Capitani Romani class as built. Heck, Tromp's sister might even qualify.
C.T.
Posted by: cxt217 at January 30, 2012 07:03 PM (JMzrv)
5
CXT, I still owe you a post... you need to get me a topic, though.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 30, 2012 07:31 PM (f/6aJ)
6
Sorry about that. The last couple months had been hectic, not to mention physically demanding that I had completely forgotten about it.
Posted by: cxt217 at January 30, 2012 08:38 PM (JMzrv)
7
Hehe I spentat least two minutes finding links!
Anyway I can't think of anything in particular, so another Mystery Ship it is!
Posted by: flatdarkmars at January 31, 2012 12:04 AM (I55Es)
The story of the Challenger disaster and the associated fallout has been often told, and I won't repeat it here. What I do want to mention is that I'm one of those few people who was actually watching the launch live on CNN when everything went pear-shaped. The three major networks were showing normal programming; Space Shuttle launches had already become old hat by 1986. To CNN, then only six years old and not the monolithic success it is now, launches were still important news.
And to a young Wonderduck, they were all fascinating. That I had the flu, or something flu-like, was only a minor impediment. I had stayed home from school and was sacked out on the couch, covered with a couple of blankets, as I watched the whole terrible event live. Some say that the loss of the Challenger was my generation's Kennedy Assassination. I suppose that's so. It certainly changed me.
1
Our teacher was showing it live in the classroom.
Awkward.
Posted by: GreyDuck at January 29, 2012 10:32 AM (eHm8o)
2
I was in the school bookstore at Drexel when someone said the Shuttle blew up, so I went over to the student center and watched the TV, heart in my guts.
Posted by: Mauser at January 29, 2012 08:44 PM (cZPoz)
3
I always had a closer connection (for lack of a better word) to Columbia. Maybe because it was the first. I know the Challenger disaster affected me; I found a little essay I wrote voluntarily amongst keepsakes and memorabilia recently. Still, it was just one of those big, dumb accidents at the time. The Columbia accident really tore me up, though. Of course, that's coming up here in a few days. History can be funny (odd funny, not ha ha funny, in this case) sometimes.
Posted by: Ben at January 30, 2012 11:47 AM (RalIr)
4
I blame Environmentalists for Columbia. They changed the foam formulation because environmentalists objected to the chemicals given off by the foam curing. That's the old foam that actually stayed on the tanks. NASA ended up sacrificing seven lives on that Green Altar.
Posted by: Mauser at January 31, 2012 05:00 AM (cZPoz)
5
Except that Columbia was using one of the last of the old tanks, with the older foam formulation.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at January 31, 2012 06:08 AM (+rSRq)
AS-204
45 years ago today, the US space program suffered the first fatalities of its history. Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee died during a routine training mission when their Apollo capsule caught fire. The conflagration was aided by a 100% oxygen atmosphere in the capsule. A single ignition source was unable to be found. A study did find, however, that the standard nylon astronaut pressure suit of the time could generate enough static electricity to create a spark just from regular movement in the capsule's flight seats.
Grissom, White, Chaffee
Their mission was officially designated Apollo-Saturn 204, or AS-204, until April 24, 1967. At that time, NASA retired the name Apollo 1 in their honor.
Sadly, they would not be the last to die in mankind's quest for space.
1
Indeed they weren't. I knew Richard Scobee when I was a little kid. Don't remember much about him personally, but he took me to NASA once for a tour. I didn't have a lot of interest in the space program after Challenger.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at January 28, 2012 12:53 AM (GJQTS)
2
And Google chooses to commemorate the 125th anniversary of the "world's largest snowflake". *facepalm*
Posted by: Ed Hering at January 28, 2012 01:07 PM (4deSp)
3
In their defense, if they commemorated every great tragedy their site would look pretty bleak.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 30, 2012 05:37 AM (PiXy!)
F1 Pr0n: Caterham CT01
Historically, the opening of the F1 season comes when Ferrari debuts their new challenger. They are always the first. Pride of place should be with them, truth be told. It's not like they aren't the oldest and most famous team in Formula 1, after all. Which makes the first debut of the year all the weirder, because it's not the oldest team, but one of the newest, which rolled out their steed. The team that was Lotus and now is Caterham stole a march on the big guys today, releasing pictures of the CT01. Ladies and gentlemen, F1 Pr0n is back!
Some interesting stuff here from Caterham. The sidepods are shorter, making for a more compact, almost wasp-waisted, chassis. Unseen in the picture above is that there's a vent in the back of the airbox to add cooling to that which the smaller sidepods lose. The exhausts are low-mounted and positioned in the lee of the sidepod's airflow. The leader at the clubhouse turn is that they'll blow over the lower elements of the rear wing, trying to claw back some of the downforce lost by the banning of blown diffusers. However, the F1 sites across the interwebs are all abuzz over the nose.
To be charitable, it's not pretty. To not be charitable, it might be the ugliest nose since the 2004 Williams "Walrusnose"... or this one. Unfortunately, that stepdown is mandated by the new tech regulations. Yes, really. It's a safety feature, designed to keep cars from being launched, somehow. I think it accomplishes the feat by being so repulsive that no self-respecting F1 chassis would deign to approach it. I tells ya, Morty, it's like it got taken back behind the woodshed and got beaten with the ugly stick. And because the rules require that the nose be no more than 550mm above the ground, but the rest of the body has to be 650mm above, we'll probably see this on EVERY car this year.
BEHOLD! The era of the ugly F1 car is upon us, and woe be unto those who think that the individualism of the teams is being legislated out of the sport by the FIA.
The next rollout is McLaren on February 1st! See you then for more F1 Pr0n!
From Daylight to Warbonnets
A lot of railfans love the locomotives. They like being able to look at these huge pieces of machinery and be able to rattle off statistics about how much horsepower it has, or how much it can pull, or how many of them there are, or whatever. And who can blame 'em? One of the (few) things I appreciate about diesels is that the railroads realized that they could be painted in company colors... and so they were. And what colors! Everywhere you went, the most boring of engines could be made interesting by the various liveries. For example, as a young duckling here in Northern Illinois, one of the most common railroad lines to see was the Chicago Central, a junior member of the Illinois Central company. They ran from Chicago to Iowa with a spur going north to Albert Lea, MN... a more boring trackmap would be difficult to find. But then you saw the locomotives.
Cardinal and White, and they look glorious. I don't even know if the company is around anymore or if they were om nom nommed by CN when they took the Illinois Central, but I still remember the plain but beautiful look of the engines.
But that's just the tip of the iceberg. Let's take a look at some of the better known and beautiful liveries throughout rail history, shall we?
1
Chicago Central as a company still exists under the Grand Trunk holding company
I wouldn't call it legendary, but I still fondly remember Chessie System's colors from when I was growing up.
Posted by: JP Gibb at January 25, 2012 07:47 AM (VSD03)
2
I didn't get to see too many trains growing up in the middle of Los
Angeles, but every time we went out to the desert or into the Sierras
we'd see trains and I'd be pressed up against the window of the car
counting cars, checking out the locos, etc. I remember seeing lots of
Santa Fe, Union Pacific, and Southern Pacific locos going through Mojave and up either side of the Sierras.
In my board game heydays, my gaming group like to play the railroad games like Empire Builder, 1830, 1856, etc. It was amusing a while back when I was talking to a train fanatic, and I knew more about which lines ran to what cities and what kinds of loads they would deliver than he did. Of course I wasn't anywhere near his league on the trains themselves.
Posted by: David at January 25, 2012 11:41 AM (+yn5x)
3
Most of the rail lines had someone in the art department at either GM or ALCO create their livery in the early days of diesel. The "Warbonnet" scheme even has a US Patent (which is odd, since as a paint scheme you'd think it'd be a copyright), but the patent holder was a GM employee.
Posted by: Ranger Rick at January 28, 2012 01:19 AM (wQTBU)
Random Anime Picture #68: What, Again? -Sora no Woto, Ep13
Didn't I just do one of these a couple of days ago? Well, yes, yes I did. Except that one actually had a point to it (i.e., don't watch Kill Me Baby). This one, on the other hand, is some attempt at an explanation of my lack of actual content here at The Pond of late. One could argue that it's been 18 days since my last post of any real value. I will concede the point. It's not like I don't have big things to write about... indeed, I've got two major posts staring me in the face (Best Late War Fighters, Katawa Shoujo).
Thing is... I just don't feel like writing. Part of it is work-related; we've been going great guns all month in preparation for the start of Spring classes, which occurred this week. Tuesday, to be exact, which might tell you just how sick I really was this past Wednesday. Anyway, work is part of it. The aforementioned Katawa Shoujo and Skyrim are also reasons why I haven't blogged much. It may not be a coincidence that my output went through the floor the same day that KS was released. I'm enjoying my time in two radically different imaginary worlds for radically different reasons. I just... look, I've been here at The Pond for a long time (well, in blog time at least). I still enjoy blogging, it's just a different sort of enjoyment now.
Back in the "old days," when nobody knew who this Wonderduck guy was, I wrote to a) entertain myself; and b) make people aware that there was a hyperintelligent duck with phenomenal (for a duck) typing skills out there who might have some interesting things to say. Then once I got noticed by a few folks who decided to stick around, the "new day" of blogging dawned. In some ways, I felt I had to keep one-upping myself. This led to mammoth posts that took waaaaaaay too long to write; 4100 words and eight hours? For an episode of Rio Rainbow Gate!?
Maybe I'm just getting old, but the immense need to write seems to have gone away at some point over the past few months. Maybe having that tooth pulled let it all leak out? I'm not going anywhere, don't fret none 'bout that. I'm not even taking a hiatus. I'm just... going to take it easy for a bit. Not for long, and you might not even notice a difference, but I'm going to stress less about blogging and try to have myself a little fun again.
Besides, the F1 thing starts up in earnest this week when Caterham rolls out their 2012 car to begin the F1 Pr0n season. I weep for my lost weekends...
1
Could be worse, you could be like me and write long anime reviews that nobody apparently reads. It would probably help if I did more current stuff, rather than the things I've been getting from NetFlix....
I also have a LiveJournal, but I had to make all the personal entries private because I had a stalker. An amazingly pathetic one, but a stalker nonetheless, so the audience there is limited to about 60, maybe, if they haven't all migrated to Facebook. That and Russian spammers on the public entries (the politics stuff).
I get more readers for my Mad Scientist porn on DeviantArt than I do for my blogs.
Posted by: Mauser at January 22, 2012 06:33 AM (cZPoz)
2
Mauser, I read them. FWIW it took a couple of years of writing and a couple of lucky breaks for me to have any readers at all.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 22, 2012 09:17 AM (f/6aJ)
3
Also FWIW, I too double-space the break after a period. I thought I was the only person who did.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 22, 2012 09:21 AM (f/6aJ)
4
Speaking of F1, I'm not sure Bahrain will happen again this year. The Shia are very restive to the Sunni elite & Iran is sticking it's big nose in the mix. A good overview is here: http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/pothot/20120123.aspx
Posted by: von Krag at January 23, 2012 10:40 AM (XIY2m)
5
I was taught waaay back when to use a double space after a period. Apparently this was never actually official per any style guides, and there is some controversy about why a lot of typing instructors set their students on that path.
Posted by: David at January 23, 2012 01:44 PM (+yn5x)
6
Take my ducks to Wisconsin? ME? I am offended, David.
VK, yeah, I know. My desire to write about F1 right now is somewhat near zero.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 23, 2012 07:21 PM (f/6aJ)
7
The problem with long reviews is how fragmented the field and the tastes are. With 40 new series every season, and a person of average free time following perhaps 3 at best, you have to hit big to evoke any kind of response. I essentially ignore anything on the Net that is not Idolmaster, for example.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at January 24, 2012 04:15 PM (G2mwb)
8
But Wonderduck, some of your flock is from Wisconsin...
Posted by: Siergen at January 24, 2012 07:13 PM (PBxDs)
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 24, 2012 07:21 PM (f/6aJ)
10
Heh, now you've got me thinking back to try to remember which blog/site I mentioned the double space thing on and just how much you've read.... *grin*
Posted by: Mauser at January 25, 2012 05:43 AM (cZPoz)
But Wait, There's MORE!
Dragging my food-poisoned butt to the car this morning, I breathed in the refreshingly cold air. When it's 12° with no wind to speak of and the sun shining, it's actually rather pleasant assuming you're dressed correctly. Got in the DuckMobile and she started right up, no problems! I let her warm up for a couple of minutes as I caught my breath (I'm still kinda shaky after the events of yesterday), then headed off to work.
As I pulled into the main lot at Duck U, the DuckMobile suddenly started to jerk and, well, chug, particularly at low RPMs. Rubbawhut? I pulled into a spot, shut her down, went into the Duck U Bookstore and immediately called Ricotta's Automotive, official mechanic of The Pond.
It only felt like this.
A few hours later, the owner hisownbadself calls. "Well, you've got an ignition problem; there was an oil leak into the distributor. When I called Toyota, parts would be $1000 and take 3-5 days for shipping." *pause* "Then I called a local parts guy, he's got a new one for $400 and it'll be here on Friday. The only difference is that it doesn't say Toyota on it. Oh, and it'll void the warranty."
Cue peals of laughter; the DuckMobile first took to the roads in 1996. She'll be repaired Friday afternoon, probably. Weather permitting.
Food poisoning and car problems; two lousy tastes that really suck together.
1
Did you do something to take over Brickmuppet's curse?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at January 19, 2012 08:07 PM (+rSRq)
2
Why the hell does it cost $400 for a dist? What's it made of, iridium-plated gold?? And how does an oil leak into it ruin it, anyway?
Dang.
Posted by: Ed Hering at January 19, 2012 08:10 PM (4deSp)
3
Ed, I simplified the story. Short version, it's nearly the entire ignition system. Distributor, cables, so on and so forth. If it's an electrical system, they'd have to replace the ignition "black box", which is of course easier but more expensive. If it's a mechanical one, there's parts galore that need to be changed.
I think. I was still kinda in a daze, throw in the lingering aftereffects of the food poisoning and he probably could have been saying that he found a colony of arugla-based lifeforms in there and I wouldn't've noticed.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 19, 2012 09:07 PM (f/6aJ)
4
Did the quoted price include labor? My guess is yes.
Posted by: karrde at January 20, 2012 07:29 AM (nEln+)
5
Is it just me or Ricotta automotive is run by a short, redhead meganekko?
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at January 20, 2012 06:53 PM (G2mwb)
6
If it was, I'd get my car serviced much more regularly.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 20, 2012 09:07 PM (f/6aJ)
Food Poisoning
Tuesday night I had soup and sandwich for dinner. Around midnight, I started getting stomach cramps... and then all hell broke loose. For the next 15 hours, my life consisted of the bathroom and my bedroom, trying to get some sleep.
After she got out of the library, The Librarian brought over more bottled water, some gatorade and most importantly, pepto-bismol. By 7pm I was feeling better. By 8pm I was able to get up the energy to turn on the computer and chat with Brickmuppet, who'd gone through the same thing recently.
I finally managed to fall asleep at 10pm. I'm still weak and shaky, but things are pretty much done, I think.
It was a lot of things. "Fun" was definitely not one of them. I'm at work right now, but the only reason I'm here is because it's the first week of classes. Any other time, I would have stayed home.
The fact that I called in yesterday, which I've only done once before in my nearly 8 years at the Duck U Bookstore, will give you an idea of how sick I was.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 19, 2012 02:53 PM (OS+Cr)
Those ducks were from North Korea, out to get another American capitalist roader-running dog. No, the term capitalist roader does not make any more sense to me than it did to Lee Kuan Yew when he saw it in the 1970s.
Random Anime Picture #67: Oh Dear -Kill Me Baby, Ep02
Pilots everywhere are frantically trying to change course right now.
I'll be blunt: Kill Me Baby is not funny. At all. I watched 10 minutes of the first episode and was surprised to find that it still had 12 minutes left to go... I thought for sure I'd gone through a half-hour already. That is NOT a good sign. Also not a good sign: Wonderduck skipping ahead during a show. I just don't do that, particularly during the first episode of a show I was looking forward to. It's not bad or anything, it's just not funny.
By the halfway point of Ep02, I was actually saying "Kill Me Baby" to my duck collection, hoping one of them would take me up on the offer. No such luck. When the above scene came on, I actually envied the one being choked out. Then I closed zoomplayer and went off and played some Skyrim.
What I'm saying is that Kill Me Baby is not worth anybody's time. Just writing this little post took more time than KMB was worth. If I was in a better mood, maybe I'd turn it into the next Rio Rainbow Gate!, but it'd fail for lack of anything interesting.
Don't watch it. Don't download it. Don't even read this post... oh wait.
1
This is the show based on the four-panel comic about the middle-school assassin, right? Yeah, the manga was snooze-worthy, too.
Posted by: Mitch H. at January 18, 2012 01:26 PM (jwKxK)
2
Correction - none of your ducks have killed you yet.
I know for a fact that you have ninja ducks who will wait until your guard is down, possibly when you are sleeping. And at least one of your ducks is probably still very angry at how last weekend's games turned out...
Posted by: Siergen at January 18, 2012 05:20 PM (VoVql)
Ph.Duck, re: Our Lunchtime Conversation...
...Albert Einstein was born in 1879, Adrian Sutil still has not found a drive, and here's the Wikipedia entry for "visual novels" (per our discussion of Katawa Shoujo). Not re: our lunchtime conversation, over at FARK, someone photoshopped a picture of Rumpole!
Pretty darn cool, eh? Not that he was ever that energetic, but it's a neat bit of art.
Preach It, Sister...
I feel much the same way right now. Tuesday is the start of Spring Rush, yet we're already stupid-busy at the Duck U Bookstore. Part of that can be marked down to being a smidge shorthanded, but it really does seem like we've gotten more customers through our doors of late. But there's a deeper, darker thing going on as well. My knees are killing me. Last Wednesday both of them hurt badly enough to make me weep when I got home. Unfortunately, there's no position that I've found that makes them not hurt, just some that hurt less. That'll make Rush Week particularly spicy!
As you can guess from the picture above, I'm still playing Katawa Shoujo. I've finished two paths, just stumbled into a third, and have the instructions on how to get into a fourth sitting here next to me. Based on the two routes I've completed, I'll temper my excitement for the game a bit. It's no longer "brilliant", just merely very very good indeed. However, considering that it's an independently produced game made by a collection of amateurs working for free and released for the price of nothing, it's really quite astounding.
On a different note, I've now gone well over a month without a cigarette. I think I'm handling it fairly well... I only occasionally want to massacre entire villages with my bare hands and drink the blood of my victims.
My ALCO PA post seems to have nudged my "I trains" button again. Here's the image I'm currently using as my computer's wallpaper:
Inside a Chicago & Northwestern roundhouse, circa 1942.
1
Of course, one proof that you're a railfan is that you know what a "roundhouse" is, and why it is round.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at January 15, 2012 12:12 AM (+rSRq)
2
Glucosamine. When my old job was killing my knees, I started on that and it really helped. Assuming it's a pain in the joint and not the tendons/ligaments.
Posted by: Mauser at January 15, 2012 01:30 AM (cZPoz)
3
Steven: ...and why a turntable isn't just something you play records on.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 15, 2012 01:51 AM (f/6aJ)
Since we have locomotives on the brain, here is a railroad trivia...
Once upon a time, there was a place called the Baldwin Locomotive Works. It was biggest locomotive factory in the Union, which meant it was the biggest locomotive factory in the US. The Baldwin Locomotive Works alone built more than four times the number of locomotives built in the states that would make up the entire Confederacy in 1861. That number still managed to surprise me when I first read it, even it really should not have.
C.T.
Posted by: cxt217 at January 15, 2012 04:34 PM (Wbp5N)
6
For such a dominant company, Baldwin was strangely short-sighted. They remained a huge player in the steam loco market until the diesel came around... at which point, they fought against dieselization. Then WWII came around and the War Production Board told a struggling Baldwin to make ONLY steam engines.
After WWII, demand for steam cratered. 98% of all locos built in the five years after the war were diesel... and Baldwin wasn't building all the remaining 2%. While their sharknose "F7"-style locos were good, they weren't good enough to break through the EMD domination and Baldwin went away in 1956.
They had built nearly 71000 locos.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 15, 2012 08:40 PM (f/6aJ)
7
Isn't it General Electric that dominates the market now?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at January 16, 2012 12:56 AM (+rSRq)
8
Yep, ~70% of the North American diesel market is held by GE Transportation. The remaining amount is controlled by EMD.
The GE plant in Erie, PA is home to the "world's largest air-hockey table."
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 16, 2012 01:16 AM (f/6aJ)
9
In the realm of locomotives, I was a little surprised by a chance to see one today.
Took a trip to visit the Henry Ford Museum, and they have one the Allegheny locomotives on display. It's a 2-6-6-6 engine weighing in at 778000 pounds, and reputedly the largest steam locomotive ever built.
The museum had a collection of other locomotives present, though the Allegheny was the king of the display.
Posted by: karrde at January 16, 2012 03:00 PM (ogrlY)
For such a dominant company, Baldwin was strangely short-sighted.
Actually, they weren't short-sighted, I'm sure. Clayton Christensen wrote a classic book about it, "The Innovator's Dilemma", which is commonly misunderstood, especially by people who read reviews of it. In particular I suggest reading the chapter about excavators and how the likes of Bucirus-Eerie failed.
Posted by: Author at January 19, 2012 09:25 PM (G2mwb)