February 08, 2011

Sort of a big, chunky kinda nose on this one. Ferrari-style sidepod inlets, Lotus-style split intake above the driver's seat, Red Bull-style high nose, McLaren-style flat forward section... it's a Frankencar!

I kid, of course. I'm sure nothing here is copied from other designs, it's just the way F1 cars look these days. Is it just me, or is the very front of the underside of the nose... hollow? Covered with a smoked-glass-like thing? Like a sensor pod on a jet plane or something? It's hard to tell, but it'd make for some hellacious camera shots if that's what's going on there! Force India is talking seriously about contesting for fifth place in the constructor's championship in 2011. If that happens, that'd be a huge step for the fourth-year team that's shown occasional flashes of brilliance. For it to occur, Vijay Mallya will have to pour a lot of cash into the team over the course of the whole season. If you remember, Force India started out quite strongly, but as the bigger teams developed their cars, they couldn't keep pace. It'd be cool if they could... I'd love to have a team to root for again. Also in passing it turns out that FI has decided on their driver lineup for 2011 but forgot to make a formal announcement: Adrian F'n Sutil and rookie Paul di Resta, with Nico Hulkenberg as reserve driver (for now). Di Resta, a Scotsman, was the team's reserve driver last year and won the DTM championship as well. So yeah, he's got that going for him, which is nice.
Onto last year's winner of the ugliest car of the year award, HRT!

HOT DAMN! Now that's what a race car should look like! Except for all the begging for sponsorships going on that is... "Your Logo Here"? "This Could Be You"? "This Is A Cool Spot"? Guys, I understand how desperate you are for cash, but geez.... To be honest though, the checkered flag really should be replaced with a blue flag... truth in advertising, y'know? Helluva nose on the HRT F111... actually, come to think of it, didn't the F-111 Aardvark have a droopy nose, too? Throw in the movable (rear) wing, and I'm more and more amused by the comparison. I wonder if it can do a dump-and-burn?

Darn it, I really want to see a nose-on picture of this beast now. It'll be taking the track at the third test session in a few weeks, hopefully we'll get some good pics then, as opposed to these, which I'm almost positive are really good computer renderings. I wonder what their cost schedule is for some of those sponsorship locations? I might have to put up a tip jar, see about getting a rubber duckie on the car for a race. Now that'd make it the single coolest livery of all time! Still no idea who their second driver is going to be... "This could be you" takes on a whole different meaning all of a sudden.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:30 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 558 words, total size 4 kb.
February 07, 2011

As with last year's car, this one was again designed and tested entirely in a computer, using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software. No wind tunnels for these guys, no sir. One could say that the CFD technique worked acceptably last year, though the team ended up dead last in the championship standings, behind even lowly HRT. To be fair, that wasn't so much the fault of the car design as it was the innards... it seemed like every race, one or both of the cars were breaking down due to a hydraulic failure or the gearbox turning itself into a wide selection of Neutrals. The chassis itself was fairly quick, all things considered. However, last year the body was built by Dallara and reminded me of another Dallara product, the IndyCar chassis. The needle-nose in particular stood out. Well, this year the team is doing the building on their own, and the nose immediately leaps out as being different. Much wider, though still lower than everybody else.

So the computers are suggesting that everybody else, with their high nose, is wrong. The rest of the chassis is pretty conventional. Nothing leaps out at you and says that Virgin is taking a risk here, though Nick Wirth, team technical director, says that they looked at using the Renault forward-facing exhaust. They decided not to use it, mostly due to the costs involved.

Y'know what? This might just be a generic F1 car. That's not a bad thing, by the way. "Generic" is a huge step up from "Dead Last" like last year. "Generic" is also a pretty solid strategy for a new team. If you make radical changes all over the place, you might never figure out which ones work... and which don't. Virgin is claiming that they'll be playing with the Toro Rossos and Saubers of the world this season... that'd be a heckuva improvement, and I wish them luck with that. That'd mean they'd be consistent point scorers in 2011, quite the leap in one year. It took Force India three years to get to that point, after all. Well, we'll see soon enough.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:00 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 378 words, total size 2 kb.
February 04, 2011
But of all the teams out there, McLaren is the only one with an institutional sense of humor. And McLaren occasionally does roll out the weirdness; witness the original "viking horns" on the MP4-21, for example. So you never be sure what's coming from these guys... and without a doubt, the team went into full goofy mode this year.

What in the name of St Fangio the Quick is going on with those sidepods? Oddly, I believe the viking horns might just give us the answer. Besides the obvious increased airflow into the radiators, I wonder if the odd shape of the 'pods don't give much the same effect as the viking horns, just in larger scale, with air being channeling over them and back towards the rear of the car. Should be fascinating to see how that works out.

Seen from the side, the car looks almost normal. Lower nose than on many of the others, with a very long, shallow descent all the way from the cockpit to the tip. Still, the odd sidepods make the MP4-26 look like it has hunched shoulders. I rather like the look of the car, honestly. Very clean. Swoopy, but not looking like it was drawn in the middle of a fever dream.

Even prettier from this angle. The odd shape of the 'pod intakes are quite visible here. I wonder... does that shape allow it to claim more of the air coming off the front tires? It might be rather roiled up air, but it's still air to cool the engine. The front half of the car is just gorgeous... so clean, and such a change from the front of the Ferrari and Red Bull. One thing that you might notice is the double air intake above the driver's head. The one in the normal position is for the engine, as you might expect. The one farther back along the fin is probably for cooling the KERS unit.
One last picture, the annual McLaren centerfold. It's a big one, but there's no staples to get in the way. Enjoy!
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:27 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 447 words, total size 3 kb.
February 03, 2011

Last year, the T127 was very much a throwback car, all slab-sides and table-flat. None of the aerodynamic swoops and curves we've come to expect from a F1 car there! Now, however, they seem to have jumped right into something more like the old teams. The big surprise is the air intake over the driver's head... they're using a split inlet, like the one Mercedes started 2010 with. I'm unsure as to what the advantage of using such a thing is, while there is at least one known disadvantage, namely unsettled and unbalanced airflow in a turn. When the car turns, the side opposite the direction of the turn gets less air, and in some cases airflow may be blocked altogether. Perhaps the Lotus engineers don't think this is a problem, or the lessened drag caused by a blanketed air duct balances the reduced airflow, or the whole problem is overblown in the first place. Still, Mercedes dropped it fairly quickly.

Lower nose than most of the other cars this season, though it's a sharp dropoff. The body surely isn't as slab-sided as it was last year, though it still seems less swoopy in the sidepod area. I suspect the biggest improvement to the car will not be in the aerodynamics, but in the Renault engines they'll be running for 2011. No knock on Cosworth, they did a great job last year, but the Renault is a definite step up, and will probably be enough on its own to keep Lotus as the best of the new teams. Will it be enough to let them play with the established teams? Well, if any of the newbies are going to, it'll be these guys. I'm sure they're aiming for points this year.

According to the team, the T128 has been designed up from scratch, using none of last year's car as a basis. It certainly looks more modern, but I wonder if that's a good way to go. The good teams got that way by building on the experiences of their previous seasons, for the most part keeping the good parts of the older designs and improving the not-so-good parts. Evolution, in other words, not revolution. To be sure, evolving a bad car isn't exactly an easy thing to do, but at least they'd have some running data to work off of. If this one was indeed begun from scratch, they'll be back at square one again. Guess we'll see... they get paid a lot more than I do to do this stuff, so they must have a better handle on it, right?
Posted by: Wonderduck at
10:47 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 466 words, total size 3 kb.
February 01, 2011
But Renault, Williams, Mercedes, Red Bull and Toro Rosso? They get to share a post... the first ever F1 MegaPr0n!
We'll start with the team that got the least amount of worthwhile photos, Toro Rosso.

As near as can be told, the STR6 is merely an evolution of last year's chassis, which was, in effect, a Red Bull RB4 taken in a different direction than the parent team's chassis, the RB6. That's hardly a bad thing, considering that the RB5 fought tooth and nail with Brawn for the constructor's championship. Still, I was hoping for something a smidge more exciting from the Red Bull "B" team. It's a lower nose than that being copied by... well, just about everybody. It's possible that Toro Rosso is running an interim design, one that uses pieces from last year's car, until the whole package is complete and tested. Of course, they might be trying to step out of the shadow of the "A" team, too. Might be interesting, that. On the whole though, it looks pretty vanilla, or at least as vanilla as any F1 car can look. I'll pay attention to the car over the next few weeks and if there's any major change I'll let you know.
Next up, 2010's Disappointment of the Year, Mercedes!

First off, I love the new paint job. Last year's all-silver livery was historical, a hearkening back to the "Silver Arrows" of Mercedes' past, but it was a little dull. The addition of the Petronas green livens it up a bit. As far as the chassis, named the MGP-W02, goes, that nose reminds me somewhat of a platypus' bill. It's certainly higher than the W01's, though. Sidepod inlets are huge, but a triangular shape as opposed to the rectangular of last year's. Is that because the designers are trying to move away from the BrawnGP design? Or just an inevitable design evolution? Kinda hard to tell from this photo, truth be told. I suppose we should get used to rollouts like this, as opposed to the high-end, no-expense-spared affairs of the past. Darn shame, though.
Our next entry comes from the World Champions themselves, Red Bull!

If there was one chassis I wasn't looking forward to seeing, it was the new RB7. I mean, let's face it: the RB6 was the best car all season; on those few occasions it didn't win, well, it wasn't usually the fault of the chassis. With uber-aerodynamicist Adrian Newey on the payroll, it's not like there were going to be many external changes.

And indeed, there aren't. Oh sure, there's a new thing on the centerline of the rear wing, which I assume is part of the actuator for the new movable bits, but otherwise? Pretty much the same. Sidepod intakes look to be a smidge smaller, but it's really difficult to tell: black on dark blue does not visibility make. I'm sure there's something different, perhaps many somethings, but my guess is that they're all internal.
Speaking of black on dark blue, allow me to present the Williams FW33.

I really do hope they keep the car number in a white circle like that on the real livery; this is just the testing color scheme. I'm going to do something I've avoided this year... I'm going to post a picture of last years' car for comparison purposes.

Sharper downward turn on the nose, angled strut connecting the front wing to it as well. The thing that lept out at me instantly, though, was the sidepod. It's definitely more graceful in the FW33, more angled across the top where the FW32 was rounded. I'm sure some of that is due to the dark color preventing details from coming out, but not all. The rear wing is different as well, with a notch taken out as opposed to the whole upper-rear corner (if you get what I'm talking about). It's a bunch of subtle differences that, to me, add up to a chassis that's more pleasing to the eye... or maybe it's the livery, I dunno.
Speaking of liveries, it's time to bring out the best-damn-lookin' paintjob of the year.

Renault this season will be more correctly known as Lotus-Renault, for reasons that are much too confusing to get into here, and this livery is a tribute to the classic Lotus "John Player Special" livery used from 1972 to 1986... and my all-time favorite to boot. It's certainly better than the bumblebee colors used last year. And while the body seems pretty normal, there's something very clever going on with the R31... very clever indeed.

As you're all aware, the trick diffusers of the past two years have been outlawed. No more double diffusers, no more blown diffusers where the exhaust gases flowed directly onto the diffuser, none of that is allowed now. Of course, that removes a small (or not that small, perhaps) but measurable amount of downforce from the equation. Now, look carefully at the rear end of the car, right around where the word "elf" is located. That's roughly where the exhaust pipes should be, yet there are none visible. Good reason for that: they aren't there. In fact, there aren't ANY exhaust ports anywhere on the rear of the car. Instead, Renault has trunked the exhaust to the bottom of the front of the sidepods... where they blow onto and underneath the floor of the chassis. This introduces faster (and hotter!) airflow under the car, which in turn increases the downforce as it passes beneath the flat bottom, just like an airplane wing induces lift... except opposite, of course. It's a brilliant idea, and one that Renault deserves to have pay off big. Of course, there are potential problems here. Extra cooling and insulation will be needed around the pipes, since F1 engines kick out exhaust gases at approximately 800°C. Instead of going right out the back, now the piping is running around such things as the fuel tank, the radiators and the electronics... none of which play well with high heat. Look for the chassis to perhaps have overheating problems in Bahrain, Malaysia and Abu Dhabi. But it might just be worth it, considering how clever the idea is.
So that's it for the F1 MegaPr0n! The real Lotus should be taking the track on Wednesday, and with any luck we'll get some good pics of that challenger. Check back tomorrow!
Posted by: Wonderduck at
10:48 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1138 words, total size 8 kb.
January 31, 2011

Yes I know, that's not a studio shot. Well, they didn't do a studio shot of the nose. We take what we can get 'round these parts. Again, let's compare to last year's car. Unlike the Ferrari, the sidepod intakes sure look larger than on the C29... in fact, the sidepods as a whole seem bulkier, at least from the front. It's a high nose, but that's more of a carryover from the 2010 chassis than a copy of the Red Bull. However...

...it has more of a droop than the C29. Maybe it's an optical illusion, but the nose seems more pointy than last year's. The shark's fin stretching to the rear wing is gone as well. After looking at the side view, I'm pretty sure the sidepods are bulkier. That can mean one of two things: one, the KERS unit takes up more space than I expected, or two, they expect to have cooling problems, leading to bigger radiator units (ergo, the larger inlets). Or something else altogether... it's so hard to tell with a F1 car. It might be simple aerodynamics, too.

I dunno... I think I prefer the looks of the C30 over Ferrari's F150. I'm just not sure if that's because it's really a better looking car, or if it's because I despise Ferrari so much. The addition of sponsor logos is welcome; it might let Sauber actually advance the design during the season. I was going to comment on the proliferation of Mexican-based business logos (Cuervo tequila, Telmex, Telcel, Claro), until I remembered that Sergio Perez is driving for Sauber this season. The addition of some color to the livery helps the looks, too.
Of course, looks don't win races... if they did, Lotus would have won every race last year.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:39 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 324 words, total size 2 kb.
January 28, 2011
Like this:

Pictures of last year's car can be found here, and may be useful for comparison purposes. Two things immediately leap out at me. First off, the nose is higher. It's more like Red Bull's 2010 challenger, the RB6, then the Ferrari 2010 car, F10. Well heck, it worked pretty well for Red Bull last year, and in Formula 1 if it works, it gets copied. The second thing visible is that the air intakes on the sidepods are more horizontal than last year. The intake above the driver's head is rounder as well.
Let's take a look at the rest of the car, shall we?
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:51 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 498 words, total size 3 kb.
September 18, 2010

Okay, let's play "Guess The Track Designer," shall we? Nah, what's the point, it's pretty obvious that Hermann Tilke's scat is all over the layout. There is one series of turns that I'm fascinated with on here, Turns 4, 5 and 6. I'm fascinated because I can't imagine anybody thinking that a hairpin followed by a tight 90-degree turn followed by another 90-degree turn in the opposite direction could possibly make for good racing.
I can see Tilke's design process at work here: "First let's draw some straight lines. Then I'll let the cat push a piece of charcoal around the paper. Okay, that's the layout!" Remember once upon a time I mentioned how all the good circuits in F1 had a flow to them, how one part of the track should lead to another in a natural, organic way? Well, the KIC doesn't do that anywhere. It honestly feels like Tilke set out to avoid that at all costs.
To make matters worse, there's much doubt in my mind as to whether or not the whole place will be finished in the five weeks remaining until race weekend. "But Wonderduck," I hear you asking, "how do you know that???" Well, allow me to show you an interesting picture:

This is the view of the main straight from right around where the start/finish line is marked on the trackmap. That's the main grandstands on the left, the paddock area is to the right. Does that look even remotely like someplace you'd want to go to to watch a race? Does that grandstand look like it's completed? Other structures around the track are much the same, looking like concrete shells with nothing inside, just the exterior walls. The actual race track asphalt is laid, but the curbs, the runoff areas, everything that allows cars to race safely? Missing or incomplete. But don't take my word for it, just take a look at this video.
Anyway, watching that video just confirmed all my opinions from the track map: it looks like disaster-in-the-making, as far as racing goes. Now driving the circuit looks like it'd be a blast, but that's not the same as racing around it.
We'll see in about five weeks. Stay tuned.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:35 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 562 words, total size 4 kb.
March 05, 2010

Okay, the first thing I can say is that this car is going to be able to outbrake anything on the planet. Look at the size of those brake ducts! Merciful Monza, those things are huge! They'd be able to ingest a watermelon!
Then there's that front wing. Yesterday I called it "simple", and now I'm going to go a little bit farther and call it "really simple." I can make a more complex curve with a sheet of 3/4" plywood... and a plain sheet of plywood would probably create more downforce.
Let's look more, shall we?
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:29 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.
March 04, 2010

Um. Well. I have to say that I'm not exactly enamored of the color scheme but as someone once said, "paint doesn't win races." This is currently the only picture of the chassis floating around out there, so let us try and figure out what we can from it.
The first thing I notice is the front wing, which could charitably be called "simple." No complex curves, no movable elements surely, just a basic downforce-producing design. The nose, and indeed much of the rest of the car, reminds me very much of Virgin's VR-1. Considering the Dallara influence on that chassis (Nick Wirth, Virgin's technical designer, worked with the manufacturer on their IRL cars), and that Dallara built this one, it's not surprising.
Not much else really stands out in this picture, though. Hopefully we'll see more soon, because we sure won't be seeing much of it during the races. With the end of the final test session in Barcelona last week, F1's testing ban is now in place... so the first time this car will turn a wheel will be in Bahrain's 1st Friday Practice session!
More when it becomes available.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
07:01 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.
February 13, 2010

Reportedly there are a lot of ex-Toyota people working for the Malaysian-based team, which could explain why the nose reminds me of Toyota's TF109. Not the wing, but the vertical mounting and the nose cone itself. One thing we haven't seen yet with this season's debuts are these sidepods. The tops are dead flat on the Lotus, as opposed to swooping or curved; interesting look, this.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
10:21 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 204 words, total size 2 kb.
February 10, 2010

Um... it's pretty much the same.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:16 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 192 words, total size 1 kb.
February 09, 2010

The answer turns out to be "evolve." Nothing shocking here; the only real changes are those prescribed by the rule book.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:10 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 213 words, total size 2 kb.
February 03, 2010

Touted as the first F1 car designed entirely in computer with zero wind tunnel testing, the VR-01 appears to have some roots in the IRL. Which makes perfect sense, considering that Virgin's technical designer, Nick Wirth, did a lot of work with Dallara on their IRL chassis. Specifically, that nose! Mosquitos have wider probosces. Compare the VR-01's needle-point nose to the humongous beak on the Renault, for example.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
03:50 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 298 words, total size 2 kb.
February 01, 2010

The answer turned out to be "not very." It's essentially an updated STR4, which was the safe way to go for a relatively small team with an all-new design staff.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
10:18 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 222 words, total size 1 kb.

High nose with just a small downward angle. Larger sidepod intakes. Pretty vanilla.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.

No glamour pics, I'm afraid. Reportedly, this chassis has been worked on (as the Brawn BGP-02) since the 2009 "summer break", so they've already filed off the rough edges. It's a high nose (though not as high as some), with a serious nod to last year's Red Bull RB5 in that it copies the "V-nose" concept. You'll note the raised edges, which in the MGP-W01 run all the way back to the cockpit. The sidepod openings are huge in comparison to those in the McLaren or Ferrari. The really innovative bit, however, is the air intake above the driver's head. The structure serves two purposes on a F1 car: it gets air to the engine (ergo the name) and it acts as a roll bar to protect the driver in case the car ends up upside down. In the past, the entire thing has been protective, built up out of carbon fiber to meet the required strength. In the Mercedes, however, there is a thick vertical support on the centerline of the airbox that serves the same purpose. The inlet is, in effect, split into two and is considerably larger as a result.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
09:44 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 353 words, total size 2 kb.
January 31, 2010

It's the first of the 2010 racers to have a low-slung nose. The idealist would suggest that they've found that it's better than the high nose. The cynic, however, will say that all the prevaricating over coming back that Renault did last year prevented them from doing enough design work to discover the possible benefits of the high nose. The sidepod air intakes are larger and lower than the other new releases as well. The front wing is pretty generic, but that'd be easy to change.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
12:46 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 2 kb.

The aerodynamics have got to be awful.
Okay, okay, click below for the real pictures.
more...
Posted by: Wonderduck at
11:21 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 2 kb.
January 30, 2010
Autosport Magazine was there:

And two guys with a camcorder were there, too:
Of course, the car could still change between now and the first test session on Monday, but there's that high nose again! The front wing seems pretty high off the ground, but look at the tires: those are full wet treaded; a weather-related high downforce setup? Maybe Williams doesn't have the final nose on there?
We'll find out for sure on Monday.
Posted by: Wonderduck at
08:50 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








